Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Jury thinks Trayvon Martin Needed Killing as Anti-Caucasian Bias Increases

Angry Negroes Make America Dangerous for Caucasians
Copyright© 15 July 2013 by Bob Hurt.  All rights reserved. Distribute with attribution.

Abstract:  American Negroes tend toward violence against Caucasians, especially in the wake of the Jury’s not-guilty verdict in the murder trial of George Zimmerman.  Outrage by Negroes and others demonstrates that the fault lies with stupidity and irresponsible parents.


Jury Acquits Zimmerman, Makes Negroes Angry

The Sanford Florida 6-woman jury unanimously acquitted George Zimmerman for killing Trayvon Martin because the jury though Trayvon needed killing, under the circumstances. 

That should have come as no surprise to the many millions of Negroes who voted for Obama because of Obama's Negroid features, but apparently it did.  I have surveyed countless expressions of chagrin by them and their moral supporters that the jury did not convict George Zimmerman for shooting his brutal attacker in the heart.  And I marvel that so many people can allow themselves to become so blind to reality, or be so stupid.

The evidence showed that Zimmerman did not stalk or initiate a violent confrontation with Martin, but Martin both stalked Zimmerman, attempted to beat him to death, and even made a grab for Zimmerman's self-defense pistol in order to shoot Zimmerman to death.

In short, the evidence showed Martin as just another Negro thug in a hoodie determine to "hate Whitey" and teach Whitey not to disrespect Negro thugs by watching them case the neighborhood in a hoodie on a dark and stormy night.

Have Negro Thugs Become the New Ku-Klux-Klan?

I find it amazing that nobody brought up Florida's anti-Ku-Klux-Klan laws which forbid wearing a hood to disguise the identity, precisely what Martin did and may other Negro thugs do.  Even innocent kids, ignorantly trying to seem "cool" wear them also.  That just makes it easier for thugs to disguise their intentions to burgle, rob, knock-out, beat, and shoot their growing array of victims around America.  Sure some people wear hoodies to protect them against rain and cold.  But thugs wear hoodies to hide their identities and to intimidate their victims, and that violates the spirit and intent of these Florida statutes:

·         876.11 Public place defined.
·         876.12 Wearing mask, hood, or other device on public way.
·         876.13 Wearing mask, hood, or other device on public property.
·         876.14 Wearing mask, hood, or other device on property of another.
·         876.15 Wearing mask, hood, or other device at demonstration or meeting.
·         876.155 Applicability; ss. 876.12-876.15.
·         876.16 Sections 876.11-876.15; exemptions.
·         876.17 Placing burning or flaming cross in public place.
·         876.18 Placing burning or flaming cross on property of another.
·         876.19 Exhibits that intimidate.
·         876.20 Wearing mask and placing exhibit to intimidate.
·         876.21 Sections 876.11-876.20; penalty.

Did Pro-Martin News Commentators Go NUTS?

Virtually every anti-Zimmerman commentator I have seen on TV or read from blogs/news has ignored Martin's thug behavior of initiating the fight by the following behavior:

1.      Stalking and sneaking up on Zimmerman to confront him for no good reason, 
2.      Slugging Zimmerman in the face without provocation,  
3.      Attempting to beat Zimmerman to death, 
4.      Attempting to bash Zimmerman's brains out on the concrete sidewalk, 
5.      Threatening to kill Zimmerman by saying "Tonight you're gonna die," and
6.      Trying to grab Zimmerman's self-defense pistol so as to shoot Zimmerman to death.

Those six behaviors constitute the behaviors of a MURDEROUS THUG, and the jury knew it, so why don't most of the Negro and other anti-Zimmerman pundits in America?

I recall seeing a Negro woman protesting and commenting on TV in front of the courthouse.  She claimed "Black life has value."  Clearly she has no clue about the value of anything.  She would have preferred to see Martin murder Zimmerman JUST BECAUSE OF MARTIN's NEGROID FEATURES.

Many apparently neutral commentators seem dismayed over Martin's death.  To the contrary, they should applaud it.  Martin has ended up precisely where he ought to be:  dead in the ground with a bullet hole in his heart.   He died as a consequence of the way he lived his life, as a thug.  He got what he deserved.  I cannot think of a more fitting end for a murderous thug of any kind, Negro or otherwise.  And I consider commentators who say otherwise as both fraudulent and NUTS.

Dangerous Negro Thuggery Trend Bad for America

Without getting into all the reasons why so many Negroes have become thugs, clearly Negro thuggery is bad for America, and as I view the situation, it gets worse and worse as the years roll by.  For several years now, Negro thugs have practiced the "Knock-Out" game.  In this terrible game, a pack of Negro thugs walk along a street or alleyway, and when they pass by a Caucasian man, one of them will throw a fast, hard punch at the man's face in an effort to knock him out cold with one strike.  

I consider such behavior a stark indicator of unjustified racial hatred.  As I see it (and as the law suggests) the victim would be fully justified in side-stepping the attacker, pulling a gun, and shooting the attacker to death.

While people can concoct all kinds of excuses for hateful Negro thuggery, no one can deny that it has become a dangerous trend.  Anonymous scholar La Griffe du Lion shows the nature of that trend by analyzing US Government crime statistics in his 1999 article "Crime in the Hood." 

In that article he shows the math that proves the following:

1.      Negroes have 3 times the likelihood that Caucasians have of committing a crime of violence;
2.      Negroes have 64 times the likelihood of committing a violent crime against Caucasians than vice versa;
3.      A Caucasian family of 4 living in an all-Negro inner city neighborhood has a 99% chance of a Negro attack against a family member in any given year.

Martin's thuggish attack against Zimmerman constitutes a blindingly stellar example of the danger of Negroes to Caucasians.  To me that means that ALL Caucasians should keep out of striking range of Negroes they don't know and trust, and Caucasians should arm themselves like Zimmerman did so as to have some degree of preparation for surviving a violent confrontation, burglary, robbery, mugging, car-jacking, etc., by a Negro thug.

If the Martin killing has not taught America any other lesson, it has taught that the bulk of the vocal Negroes of America will blindly and illogically support a Negro thug's efforts to beat and murder a Caucasian, JUST because the Negro has Negroid features and the victim had Caucasian features, and without regard to any other factor.

Lessons for Americans to Learn

La Griffe's math and Negro outrage over the Martin killing show three things:

1.      Negro thugs prefer Caucasian victims, 
2.      Generally, Negroes present a danger to Caucasians, and
3.      Other Negroes will support the Negro thug against the Caucasian victim regardless of the facts.  

Furthermore, America can count on the bulk of the mainstream news media carrying a torch for the cause of Negro thuggery against Caucasian victims, especially when the Caucasian survives by killing the attacker.  As the Martin killing example shows, that media will try to make the case for the Caucasian's guilt and the Negro thug's innocence, even though the Caucasian was completely innocent and the Negro thug had no innocence whatsoever.

Thinking Americans should ponder this conundrum:
How much worse will Negro thuggery against Caucasians become as Negroes begin to outnumber Caucasians?  

It Gets Worse, Not Better

Birth rate trends show that Caucasian births now constitute fewer than 50% of all births in the United States.  I predict that Negro and media bias against Caucasians will continue to increase in the years to come.  And I predict that Negro thuggery will increase until government finds a way to put irresponsible people in protective compounds – safe, controlled communities with gainful employment.

Just look at the kind of dangerous stupid Negro thugs represent to Caucasians:

·         A Chicago area teen beat and robbed a white man in April 2012 because the Martin killing upset him so.  Cops arrested him for a hate crime.

·         In his book White Girl Bleed a Lot Colin Flaherty carefully documents an epidemic of “black mob violence.”

·         Black Panthers leader King Samir Shabazz, raging over the impending Zimmerman acquittal, threatened Caucasians in general with violence.  He declared 
 “This time we’re doing it right...  [T]his time we’re not burning down our communities.  This time we’re going out to Whitey’s suburbs and burning down HIS community… We’re going to make Whitey feel the pain.”  
The comments at the below link show considerable Negro support for the threat.

·         One web site documents dozens of tweets from raging Negroes threatening to kill Zimmerman and other Caucasians because the jury acquitted him.

The reader should ponder this question in light of the above realities:
How could we possibly have a clearer indication of abject stupidity or sinister motive on the part of the Negroes to injure innocent Caucasians?

Parents of Negro Thugs 100% Responsible for Their Teens’ Thuggery

Let us look frankly at the reality of teen thuggery.  Society does not rear children to have values.  Parents do. Upwards of 70% of Negro children have only one parent, the mother, at home to rear them. And many Negro fathers go from woman to woman, essentially spawning single-parent children in the process, as though they have the duty to sow their seed in the community.  Negro families have become intensely matriarchal as a result.  Negro "baby-daddies" show little or no responsibility for the children they have abandoned to the mother's care, and both mother and children have plummeted into poverty as a consequence, both becoming wards of the state through various welfare programs.

Trayvon Martin livedup in a single-parent home.  He lived with his mother. And apparently neither she nor Martin's father taught him to treat strangers with love and respect.  Martin learned hatred and disrespect for Caucasian men from his parents and associates.

Government holds parents responsible for the much of the misbehavior of their minor children.  But Florida law allows prosecution of certain kinds of minors as adults for some crimes. So, had Martin survived his attack on Zimmerman, the prosecutor would probably have attacked Martin for trying to slugging Zimmerman, jumping on him, and trying to beat him to death.  And Martin would probably sit in prison right now.

But Martin did not survive, and now Zimmerman has survived the 16-month ordeal of hiding, wearing a police monitor device on his ankle, hostility from the bulk of the mainstream media and Negroes of America, and facing lawyers and prosecution, including the outrageous hostility of the prosecutor who did his best to rape Zimmerman's character in front of the jury and media representatives in court.

Martin's parents' lawyers claimed they have filed a civil lawsuit against Zimmerman, probably for wrongful death, in spite of the not guilty verdict.  The public should wonder why.  They should scream in outrage against such an idiotic lawsuit.  EVERYBODY with half a brain knows that the jury made the correct determination, though the bulk of America's Negroes and their pundits hate to admit it - Trayvon Martin needed killing for attempting to murder George Zimmerman.

WHO will compensate Zimmerman for the loss of 16 months of his life in this ordeal, destruction of his reputation, and the enduring hatred of the bulk of the Negroes in America?  Who really bears the blame for the outrageous hate crime that Trayvon Martin committed against George Zimmerman?  Common sense will give you the answer:

Trayvon Martin's parents - his father Tracy and his mother Sabrina Fulton - bear the blame for poorly training Martin and poorly preparing him for life in the outside world.  They received plenty of indications of Martin's growing thuggery - the school had kicked him out for having weed and burglar tools and contraband; he put gold on his teeth to look like a common thug; he wore a hoodie to cloak his identity and intimidate others.  The news media reported those items.  Where there's smoke there's fire.  What other thug signals did the media not report?

I believe it safe to conjecture that had Martin's parents done a better job rearing him, he would not have become a thug, and he would not have tried to murder Zimmerman.  But for their negligent parenting, their son would still live, and his victim would not have suffered outrageous prejudice by the media and the Negroes of America, not to mention the mental anguish, the court battle, and the expense.  Tracy and Sabrina have done all that damage to Zimmerman through their agent son, as though they commanded their son to do it.  And Zimmerman ought to hold them responsible by suing them for the damages resulting from that negligence.

DO NOT make the mistake of whining on the parents' behalf that they have suffered enough.  They have not begun to suffer as they should.  They OWE Zimmerman those 16 months, expenses, and relief from his own mental suffering.  They owe it because their negligence caused their son to try to murder Zimmerman.  And Martin, a minor child, had not yet reached his 18th birthday.

As I see it, Zimmerman MUST sue them in another round of self-defense, for Martin's parents intend to drag Zimmerman through a civil trial for something like wrongful death.  I hope he has the good sense to get his legal team to attack them with every ounce of energy possible for causing the death of their son and neglecting to rear him to act like a decent, civil human being.

Most of all, Zimmerman should sue them to send a message to all the parents of thugs in America, regardless of race, to do an excellent job of rearing the children to behave like decent, respectful human beings.  Otherwise they will learn absolutely nothing from this incident other than to hate "creepy-ass cracker" Caucasians for the duration of their short time on this world.

Stupid Is as Stupid Does

It should scare the reader half to death to know that, had Martin turned 18, he would now have the right to vote in elections.  God save America from such abject insanity as letting such bozo thugs vote!

All Americans should come to grips with realities of IQ with respect to racial groups, because knowing those IQs and other racial propensities can help people better to "profile" one another.  

Though pundits rant, rave, and rail against racial profiling, only an idiot does not do it.  In fact, Israel's airport security experts use profiling to minimize the likelihood that terrorists will board aircraft to cause damage to them.  Look in the news for terrorist incidents in Israeli aircraft.  You won't find any.  Profiling explains why.
The FBI and other national intelligence and investigation agencies employ highly trained professional profilers who do nothing more than anticipate behavior from criminals they have profiled.  They use a combination of information about the individual, including race, education, family life, criminal record, to understand that individual's criminal tendencies.  When possible, they begin by looking at the individual's physical characteristics.

One can conjecture about the nature of a person by knowing the average IQ of the racial group of that person.  Psychometrists have established these averages in the USA:

·         Ashkenazi Jews – 115
·         Northeastern Orientals - 105 to 107
·         Caucasians - 100
·         Non-Caucasian Hispanics - 90
·         Mexicans - 87
·         Negroes - 84

By contrasting US Negroes with Africa's Negroes one can see a vast intelligence gulf.  Sub-Saharan Africans have an average IQ of 70, in spite of the many smart Caucasians and Indians who live there.  The people of some countries there have an average IQ down in the 50's. US Negroes have a dramatically higher average IQ than their Africa "cousins" partly because in the USA they get better diet, education, and culture. But US Negroes are about 18% Caucasian, and that accounts more than any other factor for their higher average intelligence than Africa Negroes.  People inherit their intelligence from their parents.

Psychometrists consider that an average IQ difference of 15 or more points is "significant."  That means that people in a group with an average IQ 15 points lower than that of another group cannot compete with that group for the better jobs and mates.  In the US, one must have an IQ of at least 85 to graduate from high school and 110 to earn a bachelor degree from a standard college.    Furthermore, the stupid have low value of productivity.   And they impose a terrible financial burden on systems of health care, criminal justice, social welfare, and prisons, FAR out of balance with the value of their productivity.  A surfeit of stupid people destroys industrial incentive to automate and innovate.  Stupid people make their nation less competitive in international commerce, which explains why the Sub-Saharan productivity has the value of spit, figuratively speaking.

The foregoing facts hint strongly at the reason the US suffers from so much Negro thuggery.  "Stupid is as stupid does," according to Forrest Gump's sagacious mother.  Low-IQ people reliably make a lot of wrong decisions followed by wrong actions.  They find it difficult to solve problems, and tend to resort to brute force to cure their dilemmas. They cannot create an advanced civilization, but they will tend to destroy one.  And when they procreate, they tend to produce low-IQ children.

No one can doubt that Trayvon Martin made a terribly wrong decision in trying to beat George Zimmerman to death.  Such a decision, coupled with burglary and smoking weed and dressing and acting generally like a thug, provide a key to visualizing Martin's low intelligence.  Only a callous dumbass would do what he did to Zimmerman.

I do not mean to say that parents and schools cannot train the stupid.  The stupid just take monumentally MORE training than do smarter people to get the point, and some points they will never get because of their inability to evaluate relative importances.  Maybe Martin would have eventually graduated from high school.  And maybe not.  Maybe the school would have tossed him permanently for his thuggery.  And maybe the school district leaders had already intentionally dumbed down the curricula so that underachieving and stupid kids can get an undeserved high school diploma.  Florida's Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) scores, broken down by race, almost perfectly mirror the race-based average IQ scores I listed above.

These IQ and FCAT scores suggest a sad reality for Negroes, America's most cognitively challenged race in spite of the efforts of members of that race to become Caucasian:
Half of US Negro students lack the cognitive ability to graduate from high school.
That reality will condemn at least half of the US Negroes to lifetimes of low-paying jobs, low-quality mates, crime, welfare abuse, and trouble-making children who will not do well in life.

Only a benign eugenics program can cure this problem in a civilized society.  By that I mean sterilize the stupid of all races so they cannot procreate more of their kind.  Procreating a stupid child knowingly or negligently should become a kind of crime against humanity.  It certainly constitutes a crime against the child.  So, why should stupid parents think they have the right to do it?  You got it - they're stupid.  So, we can rely on them to make stupid choices followed by stupid actions.

In Africa Negroes try to cure that problem with internecine genocidal wars in which they slaughter a million or more people every year.  The homicide rate in Africa stands higher than the rate in any other continent. Read this Wikipedia article for corroboration:

And, as Trayvon Martin's behavior and the associated Negro outrage over his deserved killing testify, US Negroes lean in the direction of genocide against US Caucasians.  That of course, should they accomplish it, will only compound their problems.  Any greatness the USA enjoys now derived from the contributions of its Caucasian component over hundreds of years, in spite of, not because of, its Negro component.  I neglect to cite exceptions to this fact, even though exceptions exist, because the exceptions are not the point.  

I make this point:  
Unfounded Negro outrage over Martin's deserved killing tends to lead to STUPID, civilization-destroying behavior.   
It hardly makes sense for Negroes to rampage against Caucasians when they have become 18% Caucasian through miscegenation and Caucasian contribution to their average IQ has lifted them a standard deviation above the moron level of stupidity of their Africa cousins.

But as I have tried to point out, stupid behavior characterizes the Negro race in the USA BECAUSE it has an average IQ of 85, so low that half its members cannot graduate from high school, and many more than that behave irresponsibly because of deficient parenting.  We cannot expect "good" parenting from stupid people.

Stupidity Leads to Hate Crimes

Hate crimes become the natural byproduct of low intelligence.  The reason for hate crimes lies in the lack of understanding that accompanies stupidity.  The stupid often don’t realize that other important facts exist which they do not yet know.  They often don’t even recognize relevant facts as having relevance.  And they naturally tend to arrive at wrong conclusions, make wrong and harmful or irresponsible decisions, and engage in wrong actions.  Their actions often make matters worse, rather than solving problems that they cannot understand.

The stupid become putty in the hands of demagogues and racial leaders who want to use the masses of stupid people as a weapon to force society or government to give in to their whims. 

I see as crystal clear examples of demagogues such outfits and leaders as the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee, the Rainbow Coalition, Martin Luther King, Ralph Abernathy, Malcolm X, Louis Farrakhan, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Charlie Rangel, and Sheila Jackson Lee to name just a few. 

I believe most of these high-handed charlatans mislead stupid and gullible Negroes into thinking “Whitey” abuses them at every turn.  In reality, the stupidity of Negroes (like the stupidity of members of any other racial group, including Caucasians) constitutes the greatest source of the abuse they suffer.  The demagogues promise to work for the stupid Negroes by making laws that protect them from Whitey or give them a free ride through welfare benefits, and especially by punishing Whitey for treating Negroes in general badly.

I see some merit in the efforts of those leaders, but like the stupid Negroes they claim to serve, they also act stupidly by offering solutions that only make the Negro dilemma worse rather than better.  The demagogues convince Negroes of all kinds that Whitey is out to get them and wants to hold them down.  That generally has little truth to it.

One finds the real truth on the adage that one cannot make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear.  Society can do nothing to make stupid people smarter.  Society can only prevent the procreation of the stupid through eugenics programs that breed the stupid out of existence.  Or do what stupid African tribes do:  slaughter them.  That, of course, constitutes a hate crime that one should not commit.

But there lies an important point.  Dealing with and accommodating the stupid who run around loose in America becomes profoundly frustrating because the stupid bear watching at all times, lest they do stupid, destructive things, like committing hate crimes such as rampages and mayhem against members of other racial groups. That reality begs for some solution other than allowing them to run around without supervision.
I have determined that the USA contains upwards of 79 million stupid people (IQ below 85, can’t even graduate from high school).

·         Caucasians - 34 million
·         Non-Caucasian Hispanics - 24 million
·         Negroes - 21 million

Of the above, Negro males have the highest average testosterone levels, making them generally more aggressive.  That high aggression combined with stupidity makes them dangerous.  And that explains the rampant Negro hostility in the Zimmerman acquittal.

It also explains why stupid Negroes frustrated what they consider injustice in the Zimmerman acquittal seems to suggest to them that they should commit hate crimes against any or all Caucasians to get even. 

Some Negro pundits stupidly or dishonestly denounce society’s general contempt for Negro men.  Such blatant intellectual dishonesty prevents them from denouncing the stereotypically contemptible behavior of Negro men.  Some may loudly and illogically proclaim from their bully pulpits that the jury should have convicted Zimmerman because of the centuries of abuse Negroes suffered at the hands of Caucasian slavers and slave owners.  The intellectual dishonesty of such pundits prevents them from denouncing the Africa Negro commercialists who captured and enslaved Negroes from other tribes and SOLD those fellow Negroes into slavery to begin with.

While this should not surprise anyone, it does suggest that society should not just sit back on its heels and do nothing at all to stifle violent, unjust, and irrational hate crimes by stupid Negroes against innocent Caucasians.

Readers with any sense will take this as their cue to write their legislators and demand whatever practical action will bring a screeching halt to unfounded racial violence, even if it means changing the US Constitution to outlaw unsupervised stupidity and outlaw procreation of the stupid.  Procreating stupid children and failing to supervise them in adulthood makes no civilizational sense at all in an advanced industrialized nation like the USA.

The New Martin-Zimmerman Struggle

The US Attorney General has announced he intends for the Department of Justice to reopen the investigation against Zimmerman in the ridiculous hope of finding some Zimmerman race-related violation of Martin’s civil rights.  And Martin’s parents likewise hope to win a wrongful death lawsuit against Zimmerman.  Sensible Americans realize that the racial hatred and financial/political gain motivates the legal actions of Martin’s Negro parents and the Negro US Attorney General against Zimmerman.  And of course, the bulk of America’s interested Negroes protest that the mostly-Caucasian jurors proclaimed the Caucasian Zimmerman non-guilty because they held a racial bias against the Negro Martin.

The Attorney General’s minions will find nothing as a basis for getting a grand jury to indicting Zimmerman, even though everyone knows the DOJ can easily get any grand jury to indict a ham sandwich, so to speak. The DOJ would have to prove Zimmerman went into the night with racial hatred on his mind and attacked Martin because of Martin’s race.  Such proof does not exist, so I predict that the DOJ will never get a conviction of Zimmerman.

If Martin's parents stupidly intend to sue George Zimmerman for wrongful death of their son, even though they know Zimmerman killed him righteously in self-defense, and even they know that Martin DESERVED to die under the circumstances, then they deserve what they will probably get in a fair and just court:  NOTHING.

But Zimmerman should sue Martin's parents and seek compensatory damages for having to tolerate the following:

·         Martin's abuse and attempted murder,
·         The lawsuit by Martin's parents, and
·         The vile and unjust outrage of the bulk of the Negro pundits and Negro population of America who have anything to say about this matter. 

I believe Zimmerman has a good chance of winning such a lawsuit.

Stereotyping Does Not Constitute Racial Prejudice

People cannot help stereotyping people of different racial groups.  A stereotype simply represents an average discernable physical, mental, or behavioral characteristic.  The stereotyping does not mean that the stereotyper feels any prejudice against the person or persons they have stereotyped.  It means that without knowing that person more intimately, the stereotyper has only the stereotype by which to anticipate behavior of and prepare to interact with the stereotyped person.  That does NOT constitute racial prejudice.  It constitutes an exercise of common sense. 

That explains why pundits from the President on down have to warn America’s angry Negroes not to become violent.  They should have enough sense to recognize the jury’s acquittal of Zimmerman as righteous, and to remain peaceable on their own.  Apparently pundits realize that, stereotypically, many of them they don’t.
# # #

The author, Bob Hurt, retired from the computer industry in 2002 and became an independent student, analyst, and philosopher of law, politics, and civilization.  He plays country and classical guitar, enjoys family life, and writes commentaries on topics that interest him to his blogs and mailing list.  Send email in order to subscribe to his mailing list at lawmen+subscribe@googlegroups.com.   If you wish to comment on the above article by writing to him personally, please do so with love and respect.  Bob Hurt will attempt to answer sincere, thoughtful, polite correspondence.
Bob Hurt         Blog 1 2 3   f  t  
2460 Persian Drive #70
Clearwater, FL 33763
Email; Call: (727) 669-5511
Law Studies: Donate   Subscribe
Learn to Litigate with Jurisdictionary

1 comment:

ayden jameson said...

Hi! I read your blog. Its so nice.The Chapter 7 Bankruptcy: Liquidation Bankruptcy For Consumers and Businesses.As an experienced New Jersey bankruptcy attorney, I understand that financial problems can happen to good families who work hard, and am dedicated to helping people save their homes and get back on their feet by offering solutions, not just a “quick fix.”Chapter 7 NJ