Tuesday, June 21, 2016

Who to call for Foreclosure Defense???


MEMORIZE THIS NUMBER IF YOU BOUGHT A SECURITIZATION AUDIT OR HIRED A FORECLOSURE DEFENDER


Moving:  Such Fun!

Call 800 444 6787 if you did any of these:
  1. Hired a foreclosure pretense defense lawer
  2. Bought a securitization audit
  3. Bought a chain of title audit
  4. Bought a loan audit
Call 800 444 6787 Now
It will connect you to Allied Van Lines after you LOSE YOUR HOUSE.  They can help move all your stuff when you get evicted.  You willlose the house, you know…
… UNLESS you heed the comments below.
NO defense exists against a foreclosure of a valid loan note that the borrower breached.
None. Nada. Zero. Zilch. Niente. Niemals.  Bupkis.
That's why virtually ALL foreclosure defenses eventually fail. Only a crooked foreclosure defender hides that ugly truth from you.  The foreclosure eventually goes through to completion.  The foreclosure victim loses the house. OR, if qualified, the victim accepts an onerous loan modification.  You probably don’t qualify. Fewer than 20% do.
If you face foreclosure and don’t hire a competent professional to examine your mortgage comprehensively, YOU WILL LOSE YOUR HOUSE, one way or another, sooner or later. If you cannot prove that the lender or others in the loan process injured you at the inception of or during your loan, YOU WILL LOSE YOUR HOUSE. If you can prove it but fail ARTFULLY to negotiate or litigate on the basis of those injuries, YOU WILL LOSE YOUR HOUSE.
And that means you will have to move out. So, I decided to do you a favor and give you the above number of Allied Van Lines. Call them and they will move everything you own to your new home.
Oh, right, I nearly forgot. If you complain that you cannot afford a mortgage examination or the litigation or negotiation to use it effectively, then you will really whine about what Allied Van Lines charges to move you across town or to another state.
That’s IFF (if and only if) you have a home to which you can move.
And if you cannot afford the move, here’s what your house can look like after you get evicted:
You KNOW Whom to Call
The worst part of disasters like those shown above: generally the mortgagor (that means YOU, the borrower in default on your loan) will end up owing money for all the necessary repairs, the eviction cost, the litigation cost, lawyer fees, accrued interest, etc.
Only the Mortgage Attack methodology will give you the opportunity to save your home from such a disaster AND win concessions or money from those who injured you.
That means you must get your mortgage examined comprehensively by a competent professional. Then you can use the causes of action from the examination report as leverage in a settlement negotiation or a lawsuit against the lender and lenders associates or agents.
See?  You use the causes of action to attack the crooked mortgage instead of defending against an indefensible foreclosure.
“Causes of action” means “reasons to sue.” They can consist of a wide array tortious conduct, contract breaches, legal errors, and violations of state and federal regulations. Examples include appraisal fraud, loan application fraud, wrongful credit reputation damage, and many other terrible injuries that cost you a lot of money or put you in unnecessary jeopardy.
Some mortgage borrowers get injured badly, some get injured little, and some not at all. But any injuries can justify a set-off from the amount of your debt OR another settlement that benefits you, such as a favorable loan modification like a balloon-free reduction in your debt and interest rate, or a keys for cash deal.
You might even win a huge amount of compensatory and punitive damages (money) if you sue successfully for the injuries. In my experience, over 90% of those who get their mortgage examined have suffered injury by the lender or associates.
Yes, you can get a favorable loan modification if you negotiate from a position of power. That means you tell the lender to give you favorable terms (for example assumable 3% fixed rate for 30 years, loan balance reduced to the present value of your home, all accrued interest and costs forgiven, no 1099 to the IRS).
But you have no negotiating power without a mortgage examination report that shows how the lender or others injured you.
If YOU don’t want to lose your home to foreclosure, you know what to do. Call me today to get started on a mortgage examination by a competent professional.
Here’s another number to memorize while you make up your mind whether to lose your house or to take practical action that will give you some hope of redemption in your mortgage:
727 669 5511
It’s your choice:
  1. Allied Van Lines (800 444 6787 FREE), or
  2. Mortgage Attack (727 669 5511). Now.
Which makes most sense to you?
What? You still don’t feel “convinced” that you need to call me right now?
Okay, I have taken the time to write up a couple of examples of the benefits you can enjoy IF you act NOW to get your mortgage examined:
And here’s a little help for developing a MORTGAGE ATTACK MENTALITY:
Feel better?
Okay. Now call me. I wait expectantly to hear from you.

Ready to ATTACK???
Call NOW!
727 669 5511

Friday, June 10, 2016

What does Riblifting have to do with Jury Powers?

Prior to the Civil War petite juries determined law as well as fact, and grand juries investigated all crimes,  particularly felonies, and not merely crimes brought to their attention by prosecutors.  Also, crime victims could prosecute criminals for crimes against them, and could hire private prosecutors (still available under Virginia common law).

After the Civil War and the 15th amendment people in government felt appalled that Negroes could not only vote, but also serve on petite and grand juries.  As a consequence, they began stripping those juries of their powers.  The Florida Constitutions show this.  Now, in Florida, petite juries cannot determine the meaning or application of the law to the case, grand juries investigate ONLY capital crimes, and of course, only government prosecutors can prosecute crimes.   Furthermore it has become virtually impossible for the citizenry to pass information about crimes to grand jurors, so they won't investigate public officials unless the State Attorney allows it.

Perhaps that shows perspicacity and wisdom, for in 1921 the 19th Amendment gave women the right to vote and in 1971 the 26th Amendment gave children 18 years of age and older the right to vote.  Such a dumbing down of the electorate shows with crystal clarity the justification for stripping juries of their powers.  And it will remain so, until government restores responsibility to the electorate.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKafCx-V824

The riblifter in the above video most likely enjoys full voting rights, as do millions of "good citizens" like him in all racial groups.  And they can serve on juries.

Or, maybe this shows the wisdom of revising the voting right throughout America.

It Terry Trussell and others like him had not become frustrated with the above realities, they would not have bothered trying to form their own "common law" grand juries.  And the jury would not have convicted him today.

I propose the politically correct solution of administering a constitution competency test to, and requiring 80 percent correct answers from, all who would swear an oath to support the US and state constitutions.  If they cannot pass, they cannot vote or take government employment.
--
Bob Hurt Signature

Bob Hurt
👓 Blog 1 2   f   t  
Email     📞 (727) 669-5511
2460 Persian Drive #70
✈ Clearwater, FL 33763 USA
Donate  to Law Scholarship
✔  Subscribe to Lawmen E-Letter
🔨 Learn How to Win in Court
Mortgage Attack to Beat the Bank

 

Wednesday, June 08, 2016

Immigrant wins $30K in court over $40 purchase (Could happen to YOU)! (link fixed)

Want an[other] Honest Way to Make a Living?

If you do, LEARN TO LITIGATE.  Let's face it.  SAVING a huge loss gives the same result as making a HUGE WIN.  And, learning to litigate the right way can make you a WINNER!

Here's a story of a sue-happy immigrant who beat the snot out of Joe Average American in court, winning a $30,000 judgment over the Craigslist purchase of a $40 printer he claimed never worked right.

Obviously, Joe Average American needs to learn HOW TO WIN IN COURT.  

Well, now he can do it without going to law school.  Attorney Frederick Graves has vastly improved his on-line training course over the CD course he once sold as Jurisdictionary.  The new and improved course ROCKS!  So, SIGN UP today.  You never know when you might want it or need it.

Testimonial:

"I HATE that How to Win in Court on-line course. I just lost three, no, FOUR clients because of it.  I used to bilk my clients out of hundreds of dollars per hour, AND pad the bill with copying and travel costs to pay my bar tab. Now that the clients have taken that course, they started winning in court on their own, so they don't need me any more.  Dammit!"
                            Dr. Y. Ganuro Schmutz, Esq., MCSBSDD *









* MCSBSDD = Master of Cork Screwing, Back Stabbing, and Dirty Dealing.  Of COURSE this does not constitute a real degree, real title, real name, or real testimonial.  But, you get the idea, don't you? The whole course costs less than ONE HOUR of typical crooked lawyer time. Sign up now.  DO IT.


Yes, I reissued this message in order to fix a wrong link.  PLEASE forward THIS message AS-IS, far and wide.

--
Bob Hurt Signature

Bob Hurt
👓 Blog 1 2   f   t  
Email     📞 (727) 669-5511
2460 Persian Drive #70
✈ Clearwater, FL 33763 USA
Donate  to Law Scholarship
✔  Subscribe to Lawmen E-Letter
🔨 Learn How to Win in Court
Mortgage Attack to Beat the Bank

 

Monday, June 06, 2016

Immigrant beats snot out of Dufus Litigant in court (Could happen to YOU)!

Want an[other] Honest Way to Make a Living?

If you do, LEARN TO LITIGATE.  Let's face it.  SAVING a huge loss gives the same result as making a HUGE WIN.  And, learning to litigate the right way can make you a WINNER!

Here's a story of a sue-happy immigrant who beat the snot out of Joe Average American in court, winning a $30,000 judgment for the Craigslist purchase of a $40 printer he claimed never worked right.

Obviously, Joe Average American needs to learn HOW TO WIN IN COURT.  

Well, now he can do it without going to law school.  Attorney Frederick Graves has vastly improved his on-line training course over the CD course he once sold as Jurisdictionary.  The new and improved course ROCKS!  So, SIGN UP today.  You never know when you might want it or need it.

Testimonial:

"I HATE that How to Win in Court on-line course. I just lost three, no, FOUR clients because of it.  I used to bilk my clients out of hundreds of dollars per hour, AND pad the bill with copying and travel costs to pay my bar tab. Now that the clients have taken that course, they started winning in court on their own, so they don't need me any more.  Dammit!"
                            Dr. Y. Ganuro Schmutz, Esq., MCSBSDD *









* MCSBSDD = Master of Cork Screwing, Back Stabbing, and Dirty Dealing.  Of COURSE this does not constitute a real degree, real title, real name, or real testimonial.  But, you get the idea, don't you? The whole course costs less than ONE HOUR of typical crooked lawyer time. Sign up now.  DO IT.


Yes, PLEASE forward this message AS-IS, far and wide.

--
Bob Hurt Signature

Bob Hurt
👓 Blog 1 2   f   t  
Email     📞 (727) 669-5511
2460 Persian Drive #70
✈ Clearwater, FL 33763 USA
Donate  to Law Scholarship
✔  Subscribe to Lawmen E-Letter
🔨 Learn How to Win in Court
Mortgage Attack to Beat the Bank

 

Friday, June 03, 2016

Make Your Own Double-Inverted Diametric-Apex Cheops Pyramid Psychotronic Twirler

The double-inverted diametric-apex Cheops pyramid  psychotronic twirler

Pyramid whizbang Patrick Flanagan published the twirler design. You fold a single sheet of card stock paper into the double-inverted diametric-apex King Cheops psychotronic pyramid shape, then hang it from a string, blow on it, and it twirls.  
Twirler dual pyramid 8-color animated 374 textWhy psychotronic?  Well, Flanagan had a flair for marketing, and the term invokes images of a geometric shape with an extra dose of psychic, spiritual, spacey, mind-expanding (if not mind-blowing) PYRAMID POWER.  You see, the template design allows you to fold the paper into pyramids of the same proportions as the great King Cheops Pyramid, the shape known as a cosmic energy lens or focalizer that preserves organic matter, sharpens razor blades, and does God-only-knows-what to your psyche and meditative and healing and sexual powers, just sitting within a few feet of it or having it hang above your head.  It might even make plants grow better.  
But, honestly, psychotronic "is concerned with the energy exchange capacities of a mind-body-environment relationship; in other words explaining by technology something that, until recently, was the preserve of Eastern philosophers - how the mind relates to the body in sickness and health" (Woods, David (1976). "Psychotronics: the new science once the preserve of ancient Eastern philosophy"Can Med Assoc J. 114 (9): 844–847. PMC 1957128PMID 773526)
I liked the design, so I adapted it in Corel Draw, colored it, printed it out, cut and folded it, attached a string to it, and hung it from a lamp beside my desk.  Maybe its energy will have a good effect in my digs.  I attached two fridge magnets to one of the hanging twirlers, and it automatically swiveled around to align the edge to true north, even though the air conditioning breeze makes it swivel back and forth from that alignment, creating a sinusoidal energy blast in my direction, I imagine.  Just look at this baby TWIRL!  You can almost SEE the power curves of the energy radiating from it!
You must make the creases in your folds nice and tight, and perfectly aligned.  I use my scissors handle to press hard up and down the creases.  That helps the shape come together perfectly.  
It looks like the image below before you cut and fold it.  I designed this to take a full sheet of paper, so that the end panels and right end tab extend all the way to the edges of the paper.  You can elect to leave the end panels square so that you can fold them to overlap, or to cut them as shown so that you can fold them to interlock.
Twirler dual pyramid 8-color BOX
I put the X on the end panels in case I wanted to poke a hole there with a needle so as to string the panels and ends together with thread. I have not tried that yet.  I have thought that a proper "twirler" should have a swivel that insulates it from the force of the twists in the thread.  I still ponder the design parameters.
This will make a fun gift box for a small necklace or earrings.  I have designed two layers in the art file for the end panels:  square and interlocking. If they interlock, you won't have to glue or tape them, and that makes them perfect for turning the twirler into a packaging box for small things. Interlocked, the ends look like this:
Twirler interlocking end panels IMG_20160603_212850
When you have folded it into the basic shape above, and then look into it through the open bottom and top, you see perfectly dimensioned opposing pyramids sharing a common apex point. I absolutely love the symmetry of it, and could not resist coloring it.
Speaking of colors, I chose those because my Urantia Book 's papers on racial groups indicates the original people resembled Eskimos.  Then one family half a million years ago procreated children whose skin colors became vivid in the sunlight - red, yellow, blue, orange, green, indigo.  Then it says Adam and Eve became progenitors of the violet race whose bodies glowed with a violet hue.  All of that inspired the eight colors for the triangular panels.
You can use Krita or another paint program to change the colors or adorn the panels with dazzling psychedelic eye-candy fractals or cattails.
If you find it challenging to fold, start with the tabbed panel, fold the colored triangles facing one another, and then proceed from triangle to triangle facing colors away, then toward.  You'll end with a star shape.

twirler star IMG_20160603_133457
Take the four adjacent end panels (the ones with no X) and bring them together as you fold them inward.  That will form the proper shape.  Then glue the tab inside the opposing end, and close up the end panels.
Have fun.

twirler assembled IMG_20160603_125709

Monday, May 30, 2016

Man's Chivalry Dilemma

The Good Man's Chivalry Dilemma

by Bob Hurt, 30 May 2016



Women.  Charles Krauthammer in 1998 raised the thorny matter of feminism killing chivalry.  See his article below. He makes the point that "women and children" going to the lifeboats first makes no sense in modern times where feminists demand that women stand equal to men.  That they go with the children to the lifeboats equates them to children, needing man's protection.  It definitely does not make them man's equal, and it raises the question of why men should not go first with the children to the lifeboats, since men can certainly care for children as well as can women, particularly since most women don't breastfeed their babies at all, if for long. 


Now, to cement woman's equality with man, women serve on the Supreme Court, in Congress, serve on the front line of military conflicts, pilot combat craft of various kinds, and now even command the entire army of the Western USA and campaign to become President.  So, why shouldn't man's chivalry, protection of women as weaker and putatively inferior, go ahead and die a long overdue death?

I can think of one reason.  Women generally do not have the brute strength of men, and in physical combat, they will generally lose to men unless they distract the men with an offer of sex.

And there we have the linchpin of the argument against Krauthammer's pesky question.  Humans have lived on the planet for the past million years.  Today we see women in commercials and in public flaunting their physical presence with lipstick, pantyhose, high heels, glittering jewelry, provocative clothing, sassy hair styles, cute ways of walking, twerking, etc., ALL calculated to lure men into accepting their sexual pleasures.  Never mind that the law gives women a pass for becoming so irresistible to men of excessive testosterone who sexually molest women, even those who claim they don't want that kind of attention. 


Men can always argue that if women didn't want that attention, they shouldn't dress and act so sexy.  Women honestly sometimes admit that they want the attention, but only from the men they wish to target.  And some will confess that they dress provocatively in order to weaken men against whom they compete or whose approval they seek, such as in job applications.

I personally believe that for most of the past million years women have traded sexual favors to men for security.  Yes, in a manner of speaking, that quest gave birth to the world's oldest profession. And as a consequence, humankind has through selective breeding produced the kind of men today who respond reliably to women's sexual provocation, and women who cannot resist behaving sexually provocatively.  Those who don't provoke or respond adequately get bred out of the population because members of the opposite sex generally don't want them.

In other words, ancient humans selectively mated such that modern day women have diminutive size compared to men and tend toward that ancient willingness to trade sexual favors for security.  That explains their overtly sexually appealing or enticing manner of dress, makeup, and comportment.  They just cannot help it, and men just cannot help feeling attracted to them because of it.


That also drives men impulsively to want to defend and protect women.  And it makes men annoyed and frustrated for women to spurn such efforts.  That explains why men have loathed, or not responded well to, feminism that seeks to insist that men and women are equal.


I submit that the brains of men and women function differently from one another as a result of that selective breeding over the past million years.  Demonstrably, men have a better grasp of spatial relationships, have better single-minded focus on the task at hand,  and do math measurably better than women.  Furthermore, women seem to excel at nurturing roles, have better tolerance to pain, and multitask better than men.  Men also have larger brains than women.

But I make this main conjecture in raising this issue: all self-respecting men worth their salt will, for the foreseeable future, feel chivalrous toward women, and intuitively want women to get into the lifeboat first. Our ancestors have bred us men that way. That explains why the feminist agenda causes us men such psychic agony, and why most self-respecting women reject the feminist agenda as well.  It goes against our in-bred nature.

Generally neither men nor women want to get rid of chivalry. Bottom line, humans have customized their female descendants to swap sexual favors to men  for security.   I believe we humans shall continue that tradition apace for millennia to come.


Thank you, Ladies. How can I ever adequately express my gratitude to you?


*******************





"WOMEN ANDCHILDREN." STILL?
by Charles Krauthammer (below article excerpted from Things That Matter,Chapter 2).
You're on the Titanic II. It has just hit an iceberg and is sinking. And, as last time, there are not enough lifeboats. The captain shouts, "Women and children first!" But this time, another voice is heard: "Why women?"
Why, indeed? Part of the charm of the cosmically successful movie Titanic is the period costume, period extravagance, period class prejudice. An audience can enjoy these at a distance. Oddly, however, of all the period mores in the film, the old maritime tradition of "women and children first" enjoys total acceptance by modern audiences. Listen to the booing and hissing at the on-screen heavies who try to sneak on with—or ahead of—the ladies.
But is not grouping women with children a raging anachronism? Should not any self-respecting modern person, let alone feminist, object to it as patronizing and demeaning to women? Yet its usage is as common today as it was in 1912. Consider these examples taken almost at random from recent newspapers:
Dateline Mexico:"Members of a paramilitary group gunned down the Indians, most of them women and children."
Dateline Burundi: "As many as 200 civilians, most of them women and children, were killed."
Dateline Croatia:"Kupreskic was named in an open indictment … for the massacre in Ahmici in which 103 Muslims, including 33 women and children, were killed."
At a time when women fly combat aircraft, how can one not wince when adult women are routinely classed with children? In Ahmici, it seems, 70 adult men were killed. Adult women? Not clear. When things get serious, when blood starts to flow or ships start to sink, you'll find them with the children.
Now, children are entitled to special consideration for two reasons: helplessness and innocence. They have not yet acquired either the faculty of reason or the wisdom of experience. Consequently, they are defenseless (incapable of fending for themselves) and blameless (incapable of real sin).
That is why we grant them special protection. In an emergency, it is our duty to save them first because they, helpless, have put their lives in our hands. And in wartime, they are supposed to enjoy special immunity because they, blameless, can have threatened or offended no one.
"Women and children" attributes to women the same pitiable dependence and moral simplicity we find in five-year-olds. Such an attitude made sense perhaps in an era of male suffrage and "Help Wanted: Female" classifieds. Given the disabilities attached to womanhood in 1912, it was only fair and right that a new standard of gender equality not suddenly be proclaimed just as lifeboat seats were being handed out. That deference—a somewhat more urgent variant of giving up your seat on the bus to a woman—complemented and perhaps compensated for the legal and social constraints placed on women at the time.
But in this day of the most extensive societal restructuring to grant women equality in education, in employment, in government, in athletics, in citizenship writ large, what entitles women to the privileges—and reduces them to the status—of children?
The evolutionary psychologists might say that ladies-to-the-lifeboats is an instinct that developed to perpetuate the species: Women are indispensable child bearers. You can repopulate a village if the women survive and only a few of the men, but you cannot repopulate a village if the men survive and only a few of the women. Women being more precious, biologically speaking, than men, evolution has conditioned us to give them the kind of life-protecting deference we give to that other seed of the future, kids.
The problem with this kind of logic, however, is its depressing reductionism. It recapitulates in all seriousness the geneticist's old witticism that a chicken is just an egg's way of making another egg.
But humans are more than just egg layers. And chivalrous traditions are more than just disguised survival strategies. So why do we say "women and children"? Perhaps it's really "women for children." The most basic parental bond is maternal. Equal parenting is great—it has forced men to get off their duffs—but women, from breast to cradle to cuddle, can nurture in ways that men cannot. And thus, because we value children—who would deny them first crack at the lifeboats?—women should go second. The children need them.
But kiddie-centrism gets you only so far. What if there are no children on board? You are on the Titanic III, a singles cruise. No kids, no moms, no dads. Now: Iceberg! Lifeboats! Action!
Here's my scenario. The men, out of sheer irrational gallantry, should let the women go first. And the women, out of sheer feminist self-respect, should refuse.
Result? Stalemate. How does this movie end? How should it end? Hurry, the ship's going down.
Time, March 30, 1998

--
Bob Hurt Signature
-->
Bob Hurt
👓 Blog 1 2   f   t 
Email     📞 (727) 669-5511
2460 Persian Drive #70
✈ Clearwater, FL 33763 USA
Donate  to Law Scholarship
✔  Subscribe to Lawmen E-Letter
🔨 Learn How to Win in Court
Mortgage Attack to Beat the Bank

Monday, May 16, 2016

Fla Court Destroys Garfield Arguments in Maslanka

  

Fla Court Destroys Garfield Arguments in Maslanka

Zdzislaw Maslanka wrote paid in full on a mortgage payment check, and then sued for quiet title in 2011. He kept his loan payments current, though. He named as defendants his home loan creditor, Wells Fargo, and the loan originator Embrace, who had sold WF the loan soon after closing.  Maslanka didn't fare well in the litigation, so he hired Neil Garfield to soup up and manage the case, and to show those bumpkins how a real pro handles things.

Garfield hosed his client as you will read in the case documents, specifically, the court's dismissal order to the 3rd amended complaint, the 5th amended complaint, the motions to dismiss it, the order to dismiss it, and the appellate docket. The complaints read like jibberish-filled lunacy.

In short, the creditors' attorneys rightly called the effort an abuse of the judicial process.  The trial judge dismissed the complaints for failure to state a claim for which the court could grant relief.  In a 12 May 2016 decision, the appellate panel affirmed without comment, and it awarded unconditional attorney fees to the creditors.  Maslanka worries that he will have to pay it.  Maybe he should sue Garfield for it.

See the main case documents zipped here for easy download (https://archive.org/download/MaslankaDisasterByGarfield/Maslanka_Disaster%20by%20Garfield.zip).  If you prefer more torture, access the rest of the trial docs here

In fairness, maybe I'm too harsh on Neil Garfield.  Maybe he did his best for Maslanka, or maybe Maslanka forced him to lodge those inane arguments that I have complained against for years. And maybe Garfield has reformed since he wrote that 5th amended complaint.

But if Garfield did that on his own, he deserves severe discipline by the Florida Bar, in my humble opinion, for he just made Maslanka look like a fool. And that makes Garfield a Bozo in my book.

Comments:  Maslanka could owe over $100K in his adversaries' legal fees because his lawyer (Neil Garfield) propounded lunatic arguments in a lawsuit against a mortgage lender and creditor. If Maslanka gets a mortgage examination, he might have the evidence to prove that Garfield committed legal malpractice. Garfield is a total embarrassment to the legal profession; and obviously anyone associated with his madness, or uses any of it, is a big a clown as he is.     See this article and comments at     https://livingliesthetruth.com/2016/05/16/fla-court-destroys-garfield-arguments-in-maslanka/  
--
Bob Hurt Signature

Bob Hurt
👓 Blog 1 2   f   t  
Email     📞 (727) 669-5511
2460 Persian Drive #70
✈ Clearwater, FL 33763 USA
Donate  to Law Scholarship
✔  Subscribe to Lawmen E-Letter
🔨 Learn How to Win in Court
Mortgage Attack to Beat the Bank

 

Monday, May 09, 2016

How to Email a text message to a mobile phone (SO COOL)

  1. Find the carrier for that phone number

https://www.twilio.com/lookup

Example:  look up my number 727-669-5511 and see the carrier is tmobile



  1. Find the email format for that carrier
http://www.email-unlimited.com/stuff/send-email-to-phone.htm

  1. Plug in the 10-digit phone number and send email.
Bob Hurt <7276695511@tmomail.net>
--
Bob Hurt Signature

Bob Hurt
👓 Blog 1 2   f   t  
Email     📞 (727) 669-5511
2460 Persian Drive #70
✈ Clearwater, FL 33763 USA
Donate  to Law Scholarship
✔  Subscribe to Lawmen E-Letter
🔨 Learn How to Win in Court
Mortgage Attack to Beat the Bank

 

Tuesday, May 03, 2016

Why you should humiliate most food-stampers

Humiliation - a pretty powerful motivator.  Use it on able people who steal or scam through food stamps by intentionally remaining unemployed, giving up, bartering for drugs or booze, or living large.  Why?  Because they do it at your expense.
In a recent incident at Wal-Mart, a woman berated a man with a child who used food stamps to buy food.  If everyone berated him, he might take responsibility enough to provide for his family on his on, AND stop procreating children he cannot support on his own.
Yeah, I know all kinds of people face all kinds of difficulty in life, and have to depend on charity.  But welfare of every kind constitutes robbery, or legalized plunder, not charity.  And it is crooked.
Why does government steal from productive people and give to non-productive people?  Because left on their own, many of the more stupid and worthless of the non-productive would resort to crime in order to get by.  For those, the food stamps and section 8 housing is just a bribe to forestall criminal behavior, and many, if not most welfare recipients are criminal on top of the crime of taking welfare from government.
Where SHOULD the needy get what they need?  From neighbors.  That's good old All-American down-home CHARITY.
The point here:  Intelligent people refuse to give charity to people who act like they deserve it, who abuse it by wasting it on non-essentials like expensive steak and lobster when rice and beans or chicken would do AND stretch the charity further.

Most people feel humiliated by accepting charity from neighbors, and they do their best to get back on their feet and become self sufficient.  They SHOULD feel humiliated because that motivates them to manage their lives better.

Government removes the neighbor factor from welfare.  It steals money from the productive and give it to the non-productive whom the robbery victims do not know.  That means the robbery victims won't police or observe how the welfare recipient uses the welfare benefits.  And that is why so many welfare recipients waste the benefit - letting their section 8 homes go to ruin, vandalizing other welfare recipients, trading food stamps for drugs, and buying uneconomically.

Government feels sorry for welfare recipients and so does not want them to feel humiliated. 

I say the time has come to start humiliating EVERYONE on welfare.  Denounce them as crooks, deadbeats, wasters, lazy bums, and losers who expect something for nothing.  If they had any integrity, they would go out and BEG for handouts from people who know them or operate in or near their community.  If you are a neighbor of a welfare recipient, humiliate him for relying on legalized plunder and encourage him to ask around for donations while showing evidence of conservation, efforts to become employed, and diligent care for his property.

And many would find that so humiliating that they would strive to become gainfully employed and off of welfare.

Also, go to your legislators and demand that they support laws strictly limiting welfare for the lazy, for substance abusers, etc.  If families cannot feed their children, they should not procreate more children, so push for laws that mandate sterilization of both males and females as the price of receiving welfare of any kind, including sterilization of any unmarried fecund children of the welfare recipient.  And require repayment of the cost of the sterilization.

When in doubt, HUMILIATE.  Don't let welfare recipients get the idea that they DESERVE a handout.  They don't.  And if they start feeling guilty for subsisting on welfare, GOOD.  They need to learn how to ask neighbors, not government, for charity, and how to put their children up for adoption if they cannot support them.  Children of professional welfare recipients grow up to become criminals, often subsisting on welfare themselves. 

America, the land of opportunity, should have NO professional welfare mothers and NO professional welfare fathers.  NO, NOT EVEN ONE.

So do your part.  Humiliate every one you see every time you get a chance by expressing your disdain for them living like professional leeches, gorging themselves on the stolen productivity of others.  Humiliating is the only non-violent way to motivate them to stop using government as an agent to mug others.

Yes, you should probably do it from a safe distance and pack heat as well.  But...

...When in doubt, HUMILIATE welfare recipients.

But panhandlers?  Now I'd like to consider that working for a living, but it isn't.  It's more honest than being a professional welfare recipient, AND people donate voluntarily, so it doesn't have that mugging characteristic of welfare.

I don't like a whining, simpering, sniveling, sad-eyed, mopey panhandler.   A panhandler should panhandle with enthusiasm.  Here, let this story explain:


CAN YOU SPARE A LITTLE CHANGE?



--
Bob Hurt Signature
-->
Bob Hurt
👓 Blog 1 2   f   t 
Email     📞 (727) 669-5511
2460 Persian Drive #70
✈ Clearwater, FL 33763 USA
Donate  to Law Scholarship
✔  Subscribe to Lawmen E-Letter
🔨 Learn How to Win in Court
Mortgage Attack to Beat the Bank