Friday, May 24, 2013

Oaths of Florida Lawyers and State Attorneys


Will wrote and asked:


The purpose of this message is to inquire about your previous challenge on the Florida oath of office issue. Questions:
  1. What was the final outcome of your investigation?
  2.  Did you develop any kind of final report?
  3. Where do I look to find the the oath of judges of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida. Specifically Judge Gisela Cardonne Ely.
  4. Since attorneys are "officers of the court" and courts are of the state, did you find any state requirement(s) for attorney to take an oath???

I answer as follows
  1. I found out that many violations of oath-related laws exist, but the Florida Supreme Court justifies those by judges so long as they swore the public officer's oath.
  2. Get the Loyalty Oaths in Florida report here:  http://bobhurt.com/articles/law%20-%20Loyalty%20Oaths%20in%20Florida.pdf.
  3. Get judge oaths from the State Dept, Div of Elections, Bureau of Election Records, and from your judicial circuit's trial court administrator (11th circuit).
  4. Normal attorneys must swear the Florida Bar Oath (below).  I know of no law requiring them to swear any other oath unless they take government employment or vote.
  5. State Attorneys must swear :
    1. Florida Bar Oath
    2. Elector's oath, F.S. 97.051
    3. Candidate's oath, F.S. 99.021 and 876.05-10
    4. Public Officer's oath, Fl Constitution Article II Sec 5b; see also US Constitution Article VI Clause 3, and 4 USC 101 and 102  -  The Florida Constitution public officer oath  contains the words "I will support the Constitution and Government..." which I believe negates the oath to support the constitution and justifies the good old boys network.
    5. Public employee's oath, F.S. 876.05-10 -  876.06 requires discharge of public employees who fail to swear the 876.05 oath, and 876.08 makes failure to discharge into a misdemeanor.  I know of no law that specifically punishes the failure to abide by the oath except for laws regarding treason and other crimes.
  6. See http://leg.state.fl.us for laws, statutes, and the Florida Constitution.
  7. Many if not most lawyers violate their oaths and bar rules (below). 


Florida Bar Oath

Oath of Admission to The Florida Bar

The general principles which should ever control the lawyer in the practice of the legal profession are clearly set forth in the following oath of admission to the Bar, which the lawyer is sworn on admission to obey and for the willful violation to which disbarment may be had.

  1. "I do solemnly swear:
  2. "I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Florida;
  3. "I will maintain the respect due to courts of justice and judicial officers;
  4. "I will not counsel or maintain any suit or proceedings which shall appear to me to be unjust, nor any defense except such as I believe to be honestly debatable under the law of the land;
  5. "I will employ for the purpose of maintaining the causes confided to me such means only as are consistent with truth and honor, and will never seek to mislead the judge or jury by any artifice or false statement of fact or law;
  6. "I will maintain the confidence and preserve inviolate the secrets of my clients, and will accept no compensation in connection with their business except from them or with their knowledge and approval;
  7. "To opposing parties and their counsel, I pledge fairness, integrity, and civility, not only in court, but also in all written and oral communications;
  8. "I will abstain from all offensive personality and advance no fact prejudicial to the honor or reputation of a party or witness, unless required by the justice of the cause with which I am charged;
  9. "I will never reject, from any consideration personal to myself, the cause of the defenseless or oppressed, or delay anyone's cause for lucre or malice. So help me God."

(NOTE: This form may NOT be used for admission purposes. You must obtain the official form from the Florida Board of Bar Examiners for admission.)

[Revised: 09-13-2011]

RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR - note 4.3.3

http://www.floridabar.org/divexe/rrtfb.nsf/WContents?OpenView

1 General
2 Bylaws Of The Florida Bar
3 Rules Of Discipline
4 Rules Of Professional Conduct
CHAPTER 4 (PDF) (153 PAGES) (JULY 1, 2012)
PREAMBLE
4-1 Client-Lawyer Relationship
4-2 Counselor
4-3 Advocate
4-3.1 Meritorious Claims And Contentions
4-3.2 Expediting Litigation
4-3.3 Candor Toward The Tribunal
4-3.4 Fairness To Opposing Party And Counsel
4-3.5 Impartiality And Decorum Of The Tribunal
4-3.6 Trial Publicity
4-3.7 Lawyer As Witness
4-3.8 Special Responsibilities Of A Prosecutor
4-3.9 Advocate In Nonadjudicative Proceedings
4-4 Transactions With Persons Other Than Clients
4-5 Law Firms And Associations
4-6 Public Service
4-7 Information About Legal Services
4-8 Maintaining The Integrity Of The Profession
5 Rules Regulating Trust Accounts
6 Legal Specialization And Education Programs
7 Clients' Security Fund Rules
8 Lawyer Referral Rule
9 Legal Services Plans Rules And Regulations
10 Rules Governing The Investigation And Prosecution Of The Unlicensed Practice Of Law
11 Rules Governing The Law School Practice Program
12 Emeritus Attorneys Pro Bono Participation Program
13 Authorized Legal Aid Practitioners Rule
14 Grievance Mediation And Fee Arbitration
15 Review Of Lawyer Advertisements And Solicitations
16 Foreign Legal Consultancy Rule
17 Authorized House Counsel Rule
18 Military Legal Assistance Counsel Rule
19 Center For Professionalism
20 Florida Registered Paralegal Program




--

--

Bob Hurt Photo

Bob Hurt
2460 Persian Drive #70
Clearwater, FL 33763-1925
(727) 669-5511
Visit My Home Page  ·  Email Me  ·  Visit My Blog
Learn to Litigate with Jurisdictionary (Buy Now)
Stay informed with Lawmen E-letter (Subscribe Free Now)
Donate to my Law Scholarship Fund.


Phone App
reads tag

 

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

UBUNTU Linux Phone and Tablet Coming Soon

WHAT??? UBUNTU PHONE?

http://www.ubuntu.com/phone
http://www.ubuntu.com/tablet

UBUNTU (pronounced ooboontoo) Linux works on smartphones RIGHT NOW, but Canonical (the developer) plans release of a smartphone and a tablet running UBUNTU natively.  Many people might want UBUNTU running on their smart phones.  Read about the feature mix at the above links.  And note:  Google's android IS a Linux application.  IT runs on a UBUNTU linux base in android phones and tablets.

The ideal smart phone and tablet have HDMI connectors for hooking them to a flat panel monitor.  The latest phone and tablet will have such a powerful CPU and sufficient memory (high speed 64G) to become the NEW DESKTOP COMPUTER.

I imagine you could have a nice business installing UBUNTU on smart phones and selling terminals - keyboard (with touchpad or mouse), monitor, and dock.  I imagine also that you will find a good market for touch screen monitors in such a setup.

I expect Canonical to announce the phone and tablet full product in November.  It wouldn't surprise me to learn that they are partnering with Google who now owns Motorola's cell phone division.
Don't see this as trivial.  Universities around the world run FREE BSD UNIX (very similar to UBUNTU Linux) for their servers and computer science classes and projects.  FreeBSD formed the basis for Apple's Darwin OS which forms the core of MacOS. IOS is a Darwin application like Android is a UBUNTU application.  So, I don't expect Apple to take Canonical's move lying down.  I imagine in due course Apple will create a phone/tablet that runs FreeBSD natively.  With the UNIX/LINUX running on all the smart phones, every university student with a smart phone will have a UNIX/Linux in pocket for doing school projects including computer science classes, programming, etc.  Smart Phones will really revolutionize education.

I hope Apple and Google will devise ways to allow teachers electronically (via wifi) to turn off all phone/text activity except as needed for school projects during classes.  Right now schools make students turn off their phones and put them away.  The time could come when schools will require every student to have and use a smartphone running UBUNTU/FREEBSD for classes.  Teachers can broadcast assignments, homework, etc, and students can use the voice capability or built in keypad to type lesson work.

Where does this leave Microsoft.  The company has shoved Windows down users throats for decades.  It has become bloated, slow, susceptible to virus infections, and remains quirky if not clunky with single user paradigm until introduction of the Metro interface for Windows 8.  I still have not gotten used to it.  And let's not forget the cost.  All but a few versions of UNIX and LINUX are free, and so are thousands of their application programs, including LibreOffice and OpenOffice.  But Microsoft Windows and Office still cost a pretty penny.  The time may come when even Microsoft will port its Windows apps to Linux.

More hardware companies have begun to bundle LINUX with computers.  They should, for economical reasons. Most choose UBUNTU or a derivative.  Google, Asus, Samsung, and HP partnered to produce inexpensive Chromebook which boot up Google ChromeOS, a Chrome browser shell running on UBUNTU.  Dell has recently announced the XPS13 I7 ultrabook running UBUNTU and featuring LibreOffice.   Maybe Michael Dell, with his company staggering under $15 billion in debt, has smelled the coffee of Google's Chromebook success.  Lenovo has certified its computers for use with UBUNTU, RedHat, Novell, and TurboLinux.  System76 specializes in UBUNTU laptop and Desktop systems.

Linux, particularly UBUNTU, is here to stay, and will become a driving force in consumer computers because of its cost ($0), speed, versatility, and the thousands of sophisticated applications available for it free.  It may soon dominate in smartphones and tablets, making them into the "new desktop computers" by plugging right into the home or business flat panel monitor.
--

--

Bob Hurt Photo

Bob Hurt
2460 Persian Drive #70
Clearwater, FL 33763-1925
(727) 669-5511
Visit My Home Page  ·  Email Me  ·  Visit My Blog
Learn to Litigate with Jurisdictionary (Buy Now)
Stay informed with Lawmen E-letter (Subscribe Free Now)
Donate to my Law Scholarship Fund.


Phone App
reads tag

 

Saturday, May 11, 2013

A Contrast between Mortgage Examinations and "Making Homes Affordable" Programs

Troubled mortgagors suffer much confusion about the benefit of government loan programs.  They toss about to decide which would be best from them.  In reality, 90% of the mortgagors should never take such a program because they will fare better by attacking the lender for cheating them in the mortgage deal to begin with.

Here's the point:

1.  If the borrower defaults on a VALID mortgage loan (only 10% are valid in my opinion), through late or missing payments, the borrower ought to lose the house to foreclosure.  But the borrower should not leave the house except through selling it, giving its deed to the bank in lieu or foreclosure, or obeying court order to vacate the house.  Furthermore they might end up with a Zombie Title - persecution by homeowner associations, county officials, etc for allowing the house to become a danger to the community.

2.  If the loan has an invalid nature or the lender injured the borrower through tortious conduct, contract breaches, or legal errors underlying the mortgage, (90% of the situations in my opinion) the borrower ought to fight the lender through negotiated settlement or lawsuit for damages.  Doing this skillfully can result in the borrower getting the house free and clear and/or financial compensation (including legal fees and costs).

3.  Look at the terms of the typical loan modification to see why it amounts to a scam that cheats the borrower, leaving the borrower owing as much as 3 times the value of the house and facing an impossible balloon payment.  Take note that most loans these days are underwater, and the owner can only sell at a loss after 70 months in the house.  Do your own arithmetic on this with an amortization calculator.
  • This amortization schedule calculator shows the problem with a $250,000 loan at 6% over 20 to 50 years in duration.  Take note that on average people stay in a house less than 6 years.

Years
Payment
~ interest as % of first pmt
70-month interest
full term interest
20
$1791
71%
$80,160
$179,859
30
$1500
83%
$84,124
$289,595
40
$1376
91%
$85,797
$410,256
50
$1316
95%
$86,604
$539,607


4.  Overview all of the government's Making Homes Affordable (MHA) programs - http://www.makinghomeaffordable.gov (HAMP, 2MP, HARP, UP, PRA, HAFA) here:


5.  Remember that lenders have no obligation to make a worse deal for themselves than the present mortgage gives them.  For example, they might modify the loan to give you lower payments, but you will owe a big balloon a few years down the road (which you probably cannot pay) and most of each payment constitutes interest.  Furthermore, you have to waive any and all rights to litigate against them for cheating you in the original mortgage.

In summary, a government program puts most borrowers in worse shape than they'd enjoy if they negotiated with or sued the lender for the causes of action underlying the mortgage.  To do this, mortgagers MUST procure a competent, comprehensive, professional mortgage examination.  For FREE information about such an examination and how to use it to get financial compensation and/or the house free and clear, call me immediately.  I do not charge money for this service.

Bob Hurt
727 669 5511
Email Me


--

--

Bob Hurt Photo

Bob Hurt
2460 Persian Drive #70
Clearwater, FL 33763-1925
(727) 669-5511
Visit My Home Page  ·  Email Me  ·  Visit My Blog
Learn to Litigate with Jurisdictionary (Buy Now)
Stay informed with Lawmen E-letter (Subscribe Free Now)
Donate to my Law Scholarship Fund.


Phone App
reads tag

 

Benefits of Forensic Document Examination and Mortgage Fraud Examination

A forensic document examiner or "questioned document examiner" determines whether a document is genuine.  In mortgage and foreclosure issues, one generally recalls having signed the note, mortgage, and other documents.  But sometimes lenders, closers, or others alter documents after execution or forge signatures.  You might recall reading advertisements in which DocX or LPS offered lawyers the service of creating new "originals" for them to use in court.  Such actions can cause wide-ranging ill consequences for borrowers.  So it can make good sense to hire a forensic document examiner to inspect the questioned documents for evidence of forgery, counterfeiting, and post-execution alteration, and then to serve as an expert witness in court.

Note that the traditional mortgage fraud examiner or loan auditor cannot perform such an expert task because they don't typically examine original documents.  Even so, a mortgage examiner can often see from handwriting samples that someone forged the client's signature on mortgage-related documents in an attempt to fool the client and the courts.

The National Consumer Law Center, http://nclc.org, offers a number of publications that consumers can search on-line or download.  It provides this document on hiring and using a forensic document examiner:

http://www.nclc.org/images/pdf/other_consumer_issues/litigation-tools/docexaminer.pdf

I recommend this document to all who question the authenticity of documents related to mortgages.

Note that some counterfeit originals may bear microscopic markings (micro-printing) left by the printer.  One can use an inexpensive digital microscope to examine originals for evidence of counterfeiting or tampering, and save the image for use in a court proceeding without the need to hire an expert.  But an expert might find other evidences and provide more convincing testimony.

For an example of micro-printing, use a jeweler's loupe to examine the signature line on the front of any check from your checkbook.  To the naked eye it looks like a line.  Under the loupe one can see that microscopic words "AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE" comprise the line.

Curtis Bagget has garnered considerable fame as a forensic document examiner.  See http://expertdocumentexaminer.com/

For expert Mortgage Examination, contact for free discussion and connection to the nation's best Mortgage Fraud Examiners.

Remember that if you took out a single family home mortgage loan since the year 2000, you have about a 90% chance that the lender or lender's agents cheated you.  You ought to get your mortgage professionally and comprehensively examined because the causes of action can lead you to getting your house free and clear or substantial financial compensation for the financial injury you suffered.

Call me.  Bob Hurt. 727 669 5511 for details.

--

--

Bob Hurt Photo

Bob Hurt
2460 Persian Drive #70
Clearwater, FL 33763-1925
(727) 669-5511
Visit My Home Page  ·  Email Me  ·  Visit My Blog
Learn to Litigate with Jurisdictionary (Buy Now)
Stay informed with Lawmen E-letter (Subscribe Free Now)
Donate to my Law Scholarship Fund.


Phone App
reads tag

 

Thursday, May 09, 2013

Zombie Foreclosure Title EATING HUMAN TO DEATH

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/01/10/us-usa-foreclosures-zombies-idUSBRE9090G920130110

In the above story, a foreclosure victim abandoned his home, vandals ruined it, the city sued him for its danger to the community The bank didn't consummate the foreclosure, leaving it in the victim's name.  The victim became sick as stress piled upon stress.  The government turned him down for social security disability benefits because it saw the house as a valuable asset.

Thus did that Zombie title destroy his physical health.  You might say it's EATING HIM TO DEATH.

How could he avoid that sorry situation, even now?

Maybe not easily, but very simply:

Get a competent professional to examine the mortgage comprehensively.  Then demand settlement from or sue the lender for the revealed tortious conduct, contract breaches, and legal errors of the lender and /or lender's agents.  Those causes of action constitute the path to getting the house free and clear or financial compensation, including punitive damages against the lender.

No, I don't mean a loan audit or securitization audit, for they are worthless.
If you haven't a clue how to go about this, and you have an underwater mortgage or face foreclosure or suspect the lender cheated you, contact me right now and I'll explain everything to you, absolutely FREE.

Bob Hurt
727 669 5511
Email Me


--

--

Bob Hurt Photo

Bob Hurt
2460 Persian Drive #70
Clearwater, FL 33763-1925
(727) 669-5511
Visit My Home Page  ·  Email Me  ·  Visit My Blog
Learn to Litigate with Jurisdictionary (Buy Now)
Stay informed with Lawmen E-letter (Subscribe Free Now)
Donate to my Law Scholarship Fund.


Phone App
reads tag

 

Tuesday, May 07, 2013

May States Nullify Federal Law?




Many state governments don't like high-handed federal laws like Obamacare and gun control. So, they nullify that law by declaring it unconstitutional.  Some make enforcement a felony.

By contrast the US AG claims the US Constitution and laws pursuant thereto are supreme, the constitution and laws of the states notwithstanding.

We should consider the AG completely right... so long as the "laws" actually pursue the Constitution.  If they don't, then they thereby become nullities and no one has to obey them.

"President" Obama himself proved the profound truth of the that theory by nullifying the natural born citizen clause in the Constitution.  He did that by ascending to the Presidency in spite of not having natural born citizen status (if he is even a US citizen at all).  The courts have trounced every effort to hold him accountable.  So he should have no quarrel with the states that use the same principle to nullify laws they don't like.

Bottom line, every entity associated with government (including the electorate) has the right and duty to interpret the Constitution as  it sees fit.  And damn-to-hell (even in a clash of arms) anyone who disagrees.

If it's good for the goose (Obama), it's good for the gander (the States).

Et cetera.

Monday, May 06, 2013

Do Leftist Politics Constitute Genocide?

Do Leftist Politics Constitute Genocide?

Copyright © 6 May 2013 by Bob Hurt.  All rights reserved.  Distribution with attribution permitted.

I have read the leftist pulp entitled 8 stages of genocide, and I have reviewed the human gene situation in America.


I have concluded that some forms of genocide make sense.  Remember the movie "Alien?"  There's no question that those aliens were dangerous to humans and would commit genocide against humans, given the chance.  In the movie, it was "us" or them.  So, "we" nuked their planet to kill them off.  Unbeknownst to "us" one of them had impregnated one of "our" women.  So maybe the aliens survived and will wipe "us" out someday in moviedom.


As an example closer to home, America no longer needs a slave class of people who cannot fend for themselves.  Earlier or more primitive societies might have killed those slaves off.  America didn't because it seemed so inhumane, not to mention racist.  But it made sense for the purposes of advancing civilization. 

 

Note that I do not take issue with any particular racial group, but rather with an intelligence-based class of people that constitutes a net burden on the rest of society because of predictable and benignly preventable gene type defects like low intelligence inherited from low-intelligence parents.

 

I calculate that the USA contains around 75 million people with IQ below 85.  These people lack the cognitive ability to graduate from high school and they make notoriously wrong choices in life.  Millions more don’t graduate because of conditions at home or generally irresponsible natures.  Census figures show the US has 315 million people.  I estimate percentages:  67% Caucasian (212 million); 13% Negro (41 million); 5% Asian; and 15% (47 million) non-white Hispanic. Average IQ distribution: Caucasian 100, Negro 84, non-white Hispanic 90. I estimate these racial groups have these numbers below 85 IQ.

 

·         Caucasians – 16.7% = 35 million

·         Negroes – 51% = 21 million

·         Non-white Hispanics – 40% = 19 million

 

These defective people are real people and deserve opportunity to achieve to the extent their handicaps allow.  But an inordinate number of them in the population causes serious civilizational problems.  And so, society should limit their numbers by humane, benign means.

 

As the most benign means, the constitutions of the land should mandate sterilization of everyone who cannot graduate from high school (IQ below 85).  Why?  Because a society has the right to perpetuate its average and best genetypes, and to eliminate the rest.

Because Lyndon "Jumbo" Johnson pushed through the same kind of leftist laws Obama pushes through, many if not most of the utterly stupid and irresponsible have voting rights and can even run for office.  That guarantees we will have bad government, and it explains why we now have it.  The irresponsible dramatically out-procreate the responsible.  The responsible now die out from attrition.  That situation has come about from communist inspired "equality," women's liberation that led to pressures that drive responsible women to leave home and husband and children to work for a living, so now they don't procreate enough to sustain the gene group.


THAT CONSTITUTES GENOCIDE.  I mention the GENOCIDAL nature of laws that protect the least fit, just in case it doesn’t seem obvious to you.  To the end of such obviously intended genocide, leftist megalomaniacs (alpha males) like Lincoln, FDR, Johnson, Clinton, and Obama (along with their delusional supporters in Congress and the courts) have precipitated a critical decline of smart people in America through GENOCIDAL POLITICS.  That has numerous negative side effects.  To name just a few:

  • Lowers the average intelligence
  • Reduces national value of productivity (GNP)
  • Makes the nation less competitive against smarter nations in Europe and Asia
  • Reduces the overall standard of living in America
  • Destroys families and family values by causing rampant divorce and fatherless children
  • Robs the productivity of responsible members of society (through muggings, burglaries, street crimes, welfare abuse)
  • Horrendously burdens infrastructures of courts, police, health care, public housing, prisons, schools, welfare
  • Makes productive people hate government for robbing them


IN self-defense the smart and quasi-smart MUST MOBILIZE and ACTIVATE to get government to mandate the following to prevent genocidal attrition of the responsible, and the consequent doom of our civilization:

1.       sterilization of the irresponsible; and

2.      denial of suffrage to the irresponsible.

If you need to return to the roots of suffrage to get the point, recall whom the colonial governments allowed to vote:

  • white adult free landed male citizens

That limitation constituted a kind of IQ and responsibility test.  The stupid and irresponsible couldn't develop the ability to acquire land.  But today society has no literal slavery, so even the abysmally stupid walk free, and laws allows suffrage to the stupid, to children between 18 and 21, to women, to welfare recipients, and to people who have never read and don't understand the constitutions.

America needs to return to its roots and slam the door on voting privileges for the irresponsible.  Before whining about this, take note that the states already mostly prohibit voting to felons, aliens, children under 18, those judged mentally incompetent.  I simply propose a more "inclusive" prohibition.

Law of Survival of the Fittest (SOF)

I bring up SOF now to point out the GENOCIDAL nature of that natural law.  The "fitter" have always killed off the "less fit" competitors/challengers, but allowed the "least fit" to survive as slaves.

American government, under the pressure of politically correct leftists like Stanton who wrote the genocide document referenced above, has not only liberated the arguably least fit of America (the slaves in 1865 and through subsequent acts), but has also created numerous laws to protect the less fit from the more fit.

As a consequence of the less fit and least fit becoming so numerous and having such voting power as to overwhelm the fitter at the polls, American government has begun an inexorable decline into unconstitutionality that robs from those of high-value productivity to feed, clothe, house, and give entertainment to those of low-value (if any) productivity.  That has, of course, lured many otherwise-productive people into the ranks of the unproductive, as an easier way to subsist than working for a living.

This proves a simple axiom:

Anytime a society defeats the brutality of natural law with legislation, it must find a less brutal way to retain the same benefits that the natural law provided, or it will extinct itself.

But America has not done this.  It has defeated every tool it once had to stop the inferior and defective people of the land from out-procreating the superior.

Ergo, our American civilization has begun a decline into 3rd world status that will never stop unless THINKING, USEFUL Americans start heeding the lesson of SOF and the above axiom.

SOF brutally killed off inferior gene types through competitive or internecine wars.  American law now protects and actually encourages propagation of inferior gene types.  American law must start eliminating them again, through benign eugenics programs and denial of suffrage.  Otherwise America's civilization will decline further into ignominy, infamy, and third-world status.

Conclusion

As I have already written, I have concluded that some forms of genocide make sense.  It makes sense to kill off aliens determined to kill you, eat you, suck your life blood out of you like vampires.  And it makes sense to eliminate from the gene pool the inferior and defective types who will accomplish the same end through government, specifically through politically correct leftist politics and policies that protect the least fit without protecting society/civilization from them.

It makes no sense to kill off the average and superior (fitter and fittest), of course.  But that leftist politics and policies do precisely that through the power of genocidal, Communist influence in government.  Modern leftist politics in America differ from the politics of genocidal Communist murderer Pol Pot only in method. Pol Pot Khmer Rouge slaughtered millions in Kampuchea through butchery and starvation, focusing on the intelligentsia.  Modern leftists in America do it through genocidal laws and policies that discourage productivity and procreation by the fitter and fittest while encouraging sloth and procreation among the least fit.

The remaining prudent people of America can defeat this only by hard core political action that ends suffrage and procreation privileges for the irresponsible.  Act now to that end or fiddle while America burns into third-world ignominy.

# # #


--

Bob Hurt Photo

Bob Hurt
2460 Persian Drive #70
Clearwater, FL 33763-1925
(727) 669-5511
Visit My Home Page  ·  Email Me  ·  Visit My Blog
Learn to Litigate with Jurisdictionary (Buy Now)
Stay informed with Lawmen E-letter (Subscribe Free Now)
Donate to my Law Scholarship Fund.


Phone App
reads tag

 

Print Friendly and PDF