Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Indictments Rage on for 1099 OID Scammers

I thought I would write and explain... 

Why YOU should shy away from Patriot Myth Mongers (PMM):  You Could Go To JAIL.

Maybe you can see a bigger issue in this:  People generally go to jail for doing something wrong that endangers or hurts government or fellow humans.

Here's a case in point:  The FAKE 1099 OID Tax Return.

What they did wrong:  Filed the fake 1099 OID tax return to get undeserved money from the IRS/Treasury.

Intended Purpose:  The 1099 OID serves only one legitimate purpose.  People who buy original issue bonds at a discount and agree to forego coupon interest can sell the bonds back at face value, generally at maturity, or if the corporation calls in the bonds early.  The 1099 OID return identifies to the IRS the amount of money earned at maturity, the difference between the discount price and the face amount.

The scheme:  scammers get conned into believing that US Government went bankrupt in 1933 (even though no such court case exists) and converted all Americans into chattel of the creditors from birth.  Thus government ultimately guarantees payment of all debts from a secret birth certificate bond account with the Treasury.  By filing the 1099 OID with some related forms, the scammers get the government pay their tax debt, plus some.

The Problem:  The scheme actually cheats government out of tax revenues.  Maybe many other reasons can explain why people don't actually owe the taxes, but the 1099OID scam presumes they do, and then makes a false claim to government, a felony crime.

I know of two central PMMs who promoted this nonsense:  Winston Shrout and Sam Kennedy.  Update end Sept 2018:  Kennedy (Glen Unger) is in prison, and Shrout is due to be sentenced in Oct 2018 for 19 counts in his 2017 conviction.

I heard of numerous accolytes who learned from those gurus and then became gurus themselves, like Sam Davis, Tim Turner (who filed fake maritime liens against people he didn't like), Paul Laird, etc.  And many others learned from them to become "practitioners" who would fill in paperwork for people who then filed them and got busted.  

My Beef:  I do not love the IRS.  I consider the IRS a criminal enterprise for its abusive collection of taxes I believe people do not owe.  As a student of history, I acknowledge effective legal and political activism (including everything from elections, pressuring elected representatives, picketing, marching demonstrations, and open rebellion) for defeating crookedness in government, such as IRS crimes. 

However, I discourage individual crimes like FILING FALSE tax returns because they become a nifty way to win a prison term.  AND you will still owe the money plus penalties.  Many victims of such hoaxes became criminals.  And only a doofus could possibly claim "I didn't think I was doing anything wrong."

What Ultimately Happens:  Grand Juries Indict Scammers, the DOJ Prosecutes them, Courts Convict Them, THEY GO TO PRISON

As I have explained in the past, Winston Shrout, Glenn Richard Unger (Sam Kennedy), Sam Davis, Tim Turner, and others conducted seminars over the past 7 years instructing attendees on the "correct" methods to use in filing fraudulent financial instruments like 1099 OID in connection with income tax returns and other interactions with Government.  Until a couple of weeks ago, the main theorists avoided prosecution. But the IRS and DOJ investigations have landed indictments against their Patriot Myth Mongering (PMM) understudies like Sam Davis and James Timothy "Tim" Turner. Chris Marrero got indicted in 2011.  Pete Hesser from Port Charlotte just got convicted in November for filing false returns and tax evasion for that.  And Glenn Unger ("Sam Kennedy") just got indicted a few days ago.  Follow these links and read for yourself:



If you agree with my assessment of the IRS, don't fight the battle against them alone because you will lose.  The US Congress has devised a perfect way of making you into a slave in violation of the principles of the US Constitution.  They wrote a confusing law (codified in 26 USC) which most Americans find daunting, arcane, and  inscrutable.  Most of America's Legal community, including the DOJ, have construed the Constitution ( especially the 16th Amendment) as supporting the direct taxation of the people in spite of crystal clear language that Congress shall apportion direct taxes among (and collect them from) the states (state legislatures).   The President and the IRS agree with the lawyers. Generally, so do the courts.   

I don't.  And I have only one voice.  So I have hundreds of thousands of government operatives against me.

I have two points to make:

  1. I cannot and shall not go it alone in a battle against the IRS and DOJ and Courts and Congress and President on the issue of income and wage taxes.
  2. Millions of informed, armed, resolute, belligerent Americans can defeat the abusive scheme of income and wage taxation by legal and political action ONLY if they work together and focus their power on the weakest part of government - the individual operative, removing the evil perps one at a time till none remain.

Government beats individual Americans on the tax issue by the ICE PICK method.  The full power of the government focuses on one tiny needle-sharp point of cold steel:  the bank accounts.  Government agents forcibly extract so-called tax money from the accounts of recalcitrant taxpayers in banks, and banks cooperate.  Failing that, the operatives steal automobiles, houses, and wages through unjust liens and levies.  Failing that, theyget an indictment, prosecute, convict, and imprison the recalcitrant taxpayer.

One Obama Democrat, taking his cue from 9-11-2001, protested abusive taxes by crashing his airplane into the IRS building in Austin, Texas.  Had he managed to fly a freshly fueled Boeing 787 into the White House US Capitol building in Washington DC, that might have gotten his point across.  If that continued to happen in a variety of ways, maybe Congress would get the point.  But short of massive, meaningful protest that "No means No," the tax abuse will continue.

Bottom line, you cannot break down a block of ice by smacking it with the flat of your hand.  You use an ice pick.  You focus all the power of your arm on the point, and when you jam it into the block of ice, with that force, it begins to shatter and break apart.

I believe the voter base has become watered down by immigration and procreation of millions of people of such low intelligence that when they vote, the always vote for candidates who will make laws that rob from one group of people to give to another.  And I believe that the super-smart of the world have used credit and debt to enslave the people, corrupt the government, and destroy the value of savings and of our currency.  And I believe that the energy producers, including oil companies, have joined in to keep the world enslaved to fossil fuels and nuclear power when we should have switched to water fracturing technology to produce HHO gas decades ago for our power sources.

America needs crash programs to produce HHO gas through water fracturing devices, and to establish eugenics programs to clean up the gene pool, and to re-engineer suffrage so the irresponsible and ignorant cannot have any voice in government.  America needs to return to family values so that men and women marry, produce children, and stay married to rear those children in a responsible household environment so the children become good and sensible citizens.

This means all of us should start to work on that today, right now.

We cannot stop runaway spending that justifies bilking the populace without forceful, pin-point political and legal activism.

How will YOU make that happen?

Bob Hurt, Concerned Bob Hurt         Blog 1 2 3   f  t  
2460 Persian Drive #70
Clearwater, FL 33763
Email; Call: (727) 669-5511
Law Studies: Donate   Subscribe
Learn to Litigate with Jurisdictionary

Friday, January 11, 2013

Quentin Tarantino's Violent, Bloody, Political Entertainment: Django Unchained

Quentin Tarantino's new movie Django Unchained tells the story of a European bounty hunter (Christopher Waltz) who buys a Negro slave (Django, played by Jamie Fox), and enlists his help in bounty hunting - killing white criminals, with a high powered rifle from a distance if possible, using deception as needed.  They make a deal because of the slave's natural ability with guns.  The Europen frees his slave.  They agree to share the bounty money, and after the winter to free the slave's wife from an evil southern plantation owner (Leonardo DiCaprio).

The film stands as a monument to blood splattering violence, in a long line of similar monuments in Quentin Tarantino films over the past 20 years.

Django Unchained  (2012, 8.7 imdb.com viewer rating) stands with Inglourious Basterds (2009, 8.3 imdb.com viewer rating) as political statements against institutionalized bigotry and inhumanly brutal domination of others the bigots consider inferior. 

Inglourious showed an American officer commanding a group of GI and German assassins who murdered Nazis during WWII, and a German Jew survivor of a Nazi massacre of her family who worked with the American Officer's group to corner Hitler and his top brass in a French theater and burn them all alive.

Django showed the bounty hunter and Django slaughtering white criminals for the bounty, and Django slaughtering every white person on a plantation for the brutality of the owner toward Django's wife, a slave.

Both films seemed to make the statement that goes like this:

"Your crimes against humanity have become so egregious that you do not deserve to live, and like a nest of scorpions in the home, nothing can rehabilitate you, so you must suffer extermination.

In both films Tarantino masterfully gave the exterminations an air of immediate and dire urgency.

Both stories constitute fantasies.  The culminating extermination of the evil antagonists did not happen and never could have happened.  They remind me of "Scenes I'd Like to See" from Mad Magazine that my brother Darryl and I enjoyed back in the 1950's.  Most modern viewers probably believe the protagonists got exactly what they deserved and wished it could have happened in real life. 

THAT makes the films irresistible to those who crave justice. And so, I have concluded that Tarantino uses the violence and blood to entertain.  And he uses the just cause of the retribution to make the entertainment excruciatingly gratifying to the psyche. 

Along the way in Django, Tarantino created a Punisher-like folk hero for the descendants of American slaves.  I would expect to see Django action figures flooding the store shelves, but... will parents actually let their kids watch this bloody mess?

I note here that Spike Lee criticized the film without having seen it because of its inordinate use of the term "Nigger."  I explain the silliness of such a complaint in my blog. The Huffington Post called Lee and his views hypocritical.  I say that everyone in America has intimate familiarity with the term Nigger, and its various offensive and inoffensive uses in reference to Negroes.  As with the terms "fuck" and "motherfucker" with which Django's characters liberally salted the movie, stay away if you can't stomach them. I don't consider this a movie for "pussies."  And hey, since the uppity Spike Lee didn't complaint about them, neither should you.

As to the klutzy interview above by a British Negro journalist, Tarantino made him look like a fool for suggesting the film violence had an adverse effect on viewers.  Tarantino said he had explained his attitude on movie violence for 20 years and would not do it on that show.  He had consented to the interview to sell the movie.  I loved seeing him put the supercilious journalist in his place.

I don't believe watching fantasy drama about a people terminally freeing themselves from brutal tyrants has a deleterious effect on anyone.  All of us should show ZERO tolerance for unjust or brutal tyranny.  That makes these films the poster children for righteous indignation and uniting to stand up against and exterminate iniquitous authority.  That fact alone makes these films into great entertainment because the heroes terminated the tyranny for the good of society.  Or so it seemed.

The films might have served as great propaganda against slavery.  But they don't deal with the issue of what happens to all the feckless slaves once free.  We live now in the aftermath of Lincoln's liberation of them at the cost of a million dead in the War of Northern Aggression.  Have most of the descendants of those slaves who have no white ancestry become better off now than then?  In what ways?  How about the rest of society?  How does a society preserve the benefits of the Law of Survival of the Fittest after government seriously disables it?

Oh, what troubling conundrums Tarantino's movies raise.

Bob Hurt
P.O. Box 14712
Clearwater, FL 33766-4712
(727) 669-5511
Visit My Home Page  ·  Email Me  ·  Visit My Blog
Learn to Litigate with Jurisdictionary (Buy Now)
Stay informed with Lawmen E-letter (Subscribe Free Now)
Donate to my Law Scholarship Fund.

Phone App
reads tag

Saturday, January 05, 2013

Birther "Old" news? Nope, Still NEW News. Select news items from non-mainstream media to avoid bias.

Ted Gest of the Crime Report:


.   You wrote this:


**thanks, Bob--yes there is bias in lots of things but I try to weed it out the best I can. I took a look at the NewAmerican.

**Some of it may be OK but I am not taking news from the John Birch Society any more than I am from the ACLU.

**And no, the "birther" issue is very old news and has been rejected nationwide, including twice by the voters.

**I think we're just going to have to disagree on news judgment, but please stop the personal attacks. I'm not attacking you. TG



No you don't attack me.  Why should you?  I've done nothing to deserve attack.  But you DO insult me with the liberal-bias crime report which you pretend has no bias.


You are dead wrong about the birther issue.  Obama is not a natural born citizen and every effort to get that point heard in the courts has failed because of rogue judges who don't want the flap aired in their courts.  And, every court case is brand new news that gives media operatives a chance to inform the public that "something is rotten in Denmark" with respect to the US Presidency.  See more below.


With your statements above, you have just proven your hard-core liberal bias.  The ACLU ONLY makes news by SUING someone on behalf of someone's civil liberties.  THAT IS GOOD NEWS TO PUBLISH, so I see no wisdom in ignoring it because of the ACLU's liberal bias.  The resulting ruling makes good news too.  But so do the items from the John Birch society because they are NOT BIASED toward communism, socialism, etc as liberals are.  They have a PRO CONSTITUTION STANCE based on law, history, and the ideals of good government .  Their news items probably have far less bias in them than anything from the mainsteam liberal media.


You say birther got rejected nationwide twice.  That is false, and if you write it again I'll call you a liar.  You have implied that the population rejected it.  When you consider that America contains 80 million cretins, most with the right to vote – dumb as a bucket of hammers, so to speak, it means NOTHING if those ignorant imbeciles reject the birther issue. 


More to the point, the natural born citizen status of Obama NEVER BECAME A CAMPAIGN ISSUE, so the people did not reject it at all – many of the imbeciles never even heard it because the liberal media refuses to air it, and most Americans have no clue what a natural born citizen is or why only such a citizen should become President.


The New American, WD.net, News Max, and many non-liberal news sources exist from which you can select news stories without bias.  You are so far gone that you don't even see that your selections reflect liberal bias to a T because you select them from LIBERAL SOURCES ONLY.  That's how you screwed up so badly in the beginning of the Trayvon Martin story.  You selected a liberal item declaring Trayvon as the innocent young teen victim instead of the brutal thug who deserved the killing George Zimmerman administered to him in self-defense.   You ignored the fact that Trayvon's parents totally escaped scrutiny even though his father was RESPONSIBLE for letting the Trayvon run around a strange community at night.  And Trayvon LOOKED like he was casing the houses so he might burgle one, FOR WHICH KIND OF CRIME HE JUST GOT TOSSED OUT OF SCHOOL THAT VERY DAY.  And you ignored the fact that 6 BLACK LEGISLATORS condemned George Z wrongfully JUST BECAUSE he looked white and he killed a black thug.  THEY made it a racial issue when it had nothing to do with race, except hate-whitey racism in the mind of Trayvon Martin.


Admit it.  You screwed up that story royally, especially in the beginning, ALL BECAUSE YOU CHOSE THE WRONG NEWS ITEMS FROM THE WRONG SOURCES.  Eventually the mainstream (liberal) media from which you select news items finally got around begrudgingly to admitting to some of Trayvon's evils, and you followed suit.  You would never have the embarrassment of such miscasting of news if you only selected news items from non-liberal sources.


You cannot have an unbiased crime report if you keep selecting news items from the mainstream media.  IT IS LIBERAL, to say the least, and most of them seem to serve Communist/Socialist agendas.


Before you continue taking umbrage at my comments to you, realize that I have tried to write to you as a professional to let you know the error in your methods.  I have done this without histrionics, ad hominems, etc.  I want you to know that you betray the trust of every single reader when you select items from liberal-biased sources exclusively because they have ZERO loyalty to truth or to the ideals of good government memorialized in our Constitution.  I don't want to insult you.  I want you to publish a stupendous, UNBIASED crime report.  What do I have to say to get that point across to you?


To fix your report, just start adding balance to it by selecting news items from non-liberal sources.  You need to start by seeing the mainstream media HONESTLY as PROFOUNDLY LEFTIST in BIAS, and what you consider conservative media as more CENTRIST.  You need to seek news items from the New American, News Max, WD.net, Washington Times, National Review, Weekly Standard.  Just a brief look at the web produced this list:  http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=4047.


Also, you are dead wrong to think of the JBS as a right wing or conservative organization.  It is AMERICANIST, neither left nor right.  Its founder lined up his crosshairs on international Communism back in the late 1950's, and showed that many people in US government had conspired to further the worldwide ambitions of Communism.  Robert Welch exposed Eisenhower for repatriating Russians whom he knew the Communists would slaughter (which they did, hanging them on meat hooks in Red Square).  Various authors documented the trail of treason and deceit from Alger Hiss, and exposed the conspiracy of international banking families to take control of US money and enslave the citizenry through the progressive income tax and the federal reserve banks (which have private founders who pay no income tax on their fed earnings or earnings of the investment of those earnings).  They have touted the Federalist papers and encouraged Americans to become honestly informed about US and world history.  That is neither liberal nor conservative. The John Birch Society is EXCLUSIVELY an educational organization.  BUT, JBS authors have pointed out the intention of Communists to take over American universities and to pervert the thinking of students, making them anti-American in sentiment.  And the point I have made to you boils down to this:  they succeeded in YOUR case because you don't have even a faint clue that the mainstream media you so dearly love and honor became a product of those very efforts to subvert the KNOWLEDGE of mankind into a Communist/Socialist model.


I have studied these issues intently for nearly 50 years.  I know whereof I write.  I have no motive to deceive you.  And I look at your crime report as such a triviality, except that I can see GUN CONTROL written all over your news selections.  It mirrors the Communist agenda to disarm American citizens.  Like it or not, your Crime Report is an instrumentality of the Communist agenda.  I didn't make that up.  I just report to you what I see, and what I have proven through a small example in that public denunciation I wrote.


It took me a while to come to that conclusion, and frankly, I felt a little astounded that YOU, a man I had started to respect for professionalism, bucked against me so rigorously when I informed you of your bias and scolded you for it.  It then took me a while to realize that you had no clue, that you look at the whole thing through colored glass and cannot even see the RED (for Communism) scattered throughout your crime reports, colored by your selections of biased reports from the liberal media that leans toward Communism/Socialism.


Take this home and read it to your wife.  Maybe she can help you understand what's going on in your 40 years of experience.  You have become a political hunchback and you think you stand up straight.


Take a look at the below note about a birther case just dismissed in Leon County Florida, and look at the reason.  Reads kind of like the specium you cited, doesn't it?  Now look at this little array of excerpts from law for contrast, regarding loyalty oaths:


1.      (US Constitution Article VI, Clause 3 - The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.


2.      United States Code, Title 4, Section 101 & 102 -  Every member of a State legislature, and every executive and judicial officer of a State, shall, before he proceeds to execute the duties of his office, take an oath in the following form, to wit: "I, A B, do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution of the United States." Such oath may be administered by any person who, by the law of the State, is authorized to administer the oath of office; and the person so administering such oath shall cause a record or certificate thereof to be made in the same manner, as by the law of the State, he is directed to record or certify the oath of office.


3.      Florida Constitution, Article II, Section 5 (b) -Each state and county officer, before entering upon the duties of the office, shall give bond as required by law, and shall swear or affirm:  "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support, protect, and defend the Constitution and Government of the United States and of the State of Florida; that I am duly qualified to hold office under the Constitution of the state; and that I will well and faithfully perform the duties of   (title of office)   on which I am now about to enter. So help me God.", and thereafter shall devote personal attention to the duties of the office, and continue in office until a successor qualifies.


4.      US Constitution Article IV Section 4.  The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence.



Maybe you can tell from the yellow highlighting that the Florida Constitution COMPLETELY VIOLATES the intent of the loyalty oath which the US Constitution requires and the US Law prescribes.  It has the public officers swear to support the GOVERNMENT as well as the Constitution.  The Government IS the "good old boys network" of public policy makers who flout the law and constitutions at will.  The Government IS THE ENEMY of the Constitution because it is the very entity the Constitution seeks to CONTROL so government employees will not stray outside their box and make absurd, inane, and illegal rulings like the idiotically treasonous Leon County Judge Kevin Carroll did.  Carroll has single-handedly created a judicial oligarchy by saying he does not care what  the law says because HE supports the GOVERNMENT (not the constitutions).


Do you see the dilemma here?  A public officer cannot support BOTH the government and the constitution.  A public officer will almost always wander afield from the ideals of good government, and so the CONSTITUION RESTRAINS HIM, CHAINS HIM DOWN.  THAT explains why the US Constitution and US LAW require an oath to support the US Constitution, and not anything else, CERTAINLY not the government.


Why does this matter?  Because now OBAMA, a non-natural-born citizen who has alien loyalties functions as US President, head of the very government to which Carroll has just expressed his loyalty.  He has flouted the Constitution's citizenship requirement for presidents.  And the only government entity that could have brought him to bay, the Courts, have, across America, in dozens of cases, REFUSED TO HEAR the complaints against OBAMA for usurping the presidency without authority.


THAT IS MIND-BLOWING CRIME NEWS.  Why don't you report it?


It is also mind-blowing news that the Florida Constitution oath violates the US Constitution and turns Florida's government into an oligarchy, a violation of Article IV Section 4 (cited above) or the US Constitution which guarantees the states a republican form of government.  Do you have a clue what that means.  If you do, write back to me the 1787 definition of a republic.



In summary, you weed bias out of your crime reports by selecting news items from NON-LIBERAL media.  In particular, choose items from those I named above.


Yeah, I know, this photo makes me look a little like Karl Marx.  You know him, right?

I'm not he.





Bob Hurt


Contact: Email  bh   f       t • 
1 2 3 • 
E-letter Subscribe Donate Learn
2460 Persian Drive #70,  Clearwater,  Florida 33763  •  
727 669 5511






From: Dave King
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 3:29 AM
To: 'Bob Hurt'
Subject: RE: [Lawmen: 5033] Newly Found Case Authority; Florida Court Has Jurisdiction To Rule On Obama's Eligibility



It seems that a lot of courageous people are doing things to push this issue through the courts. But the last ruling in Florida shows an arrogance from the judges. Examples like this are quite discouraging. But to see people not give up in pressing this is at the same time encouraging. See here http://www.westernjournalism.com/florida-judge-quotes-christmas-movie-in-ruling-obama-eligible/:


On Dec. 13, Florida Circuit Court of Leon County Judge Kevin Carroll gave the plaintiffs until Dec. 23 to respond to Obama's attorneys' motion to dismiss the case. However, Judge Carroll went against his own order and dismissed the case on the 21st. In his dismissal, Carroll wrote:


"This court notes that President Obama lives in the White House. He flies on Air Force One. He has appeared before Congress, delivered State of the Union addresses and meets with congressional leaders on a regular basis. He has appointed countless ambassadors to represent the interests of the United States throughout the world."
"As this matter has come before the court at this time of the year it seems only appropriate to paraphrase the ruling rendered by the fictional Judge Henry X. Harper from New York in open court in the classic holiday film 'Miracle on 34th St.' 'Since the United States Government declares this man to be president, this court will not dispute it. Case dismissed.'"


From: lawmen@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of Bob Hurt
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 1:01 AM
To: Lawmen
Subject: [Lawmen: 5033] Newly Found Case Authority; Florida Court Has Jurisdiction To Rule On Obama's Eligibility


I am using the Free version of SPAMfighter.
SPAMfighter has removed 18753 of my spam emails to date.

Do you have a slow PC? Try a free scan!