Saturday, April 09, 2005

Why Cesium Chloride Kills Cancer


What Causes Cancer Cells to Develop

A trophoblast is a generic cell that can follow genetic patterns to produce other body cells such as organs, skin, and bone. A trophoblast’s only job is to reproduce rapidly. Trophoblasts are a normal part of body regeneration or rejuvenation. Until the age of 6 weeks when a pancreas develops and starts emitting enzymes to suppress trophoblast production, the human embryo is comprised mostly of trophoblasts. They are essential to the growth and development of the body.

The body produces trophoblasts as a result of impact or physical trauma to parent cells. Through mitosis (splitting), these quickly produce normal body cells in order to repair the injury.

However, toxins and oxygen deprivation can also produce trophoblasts. Researcher Otto Warburg discovered that cells which are oxygen-deprived produce trophoblasts within two cycles of mitosis. Enzymes and chemicals that surround trophoblasts can cause them to ignore genetic programming and start producing other, unrelated body cells in a helter-skelter manner. These are cancer cells. They have the form and general character of normal body cells, but they metabolize differently and are not related to the organ or area of tissue where they reside, so they debilitate the functioning of that organ or tissue, and, unchecked, eventually kill the body.

How Cancer Cells Grow and Affect the Body

Cancer cells are anaerobic, meaning they can live without oxygen. They thrive on glucose, robbing healthy cells of that vital nutrient, and causing the healthy parts of the body to waste away while tumors grow. The metabolism of cancer cells ferments glucose into lactic acid. The acid reduces the respiration of cell walls, and prevents the proper intake of oxygen and elimination of carbon dioxide and other wastes. The huge flow of lactic acid into the blood stream from cancer cells overworks the liver and further depletes energy.

The lactic acid produced by fermentation lowers the cell pH and destroys the ability of DNA and RNA to control cell division. As a result, cancer cells begin to multiply unchecked. The lactic acid simultaneously disables cell enzymes and causes intense local pain. Therefore, cancer appears as a rapidly growing outer cell mass with a core of dead cells. Because cancer cells ignore DNA/RNA patterns, they mutate into any other kinds of cells that can more easily tolerate the toxic environment of the surrounding tumor. That is why cancer tumors often contain the hardiest of body items: teeth, hair, and fingernails.

The effect of pH on Cancer Cells

Researchers Brewer and Sartori discovered that raising pH above 8 in the area of cancer cells kills them. The pH scale ranges from 0 to 14, with 7 being normal. A pH lower than 7 means the body is acidic, and higher means it is alkaline. The body keeps the blood stream at a constant pH of 7.37, but the pH of cells and other body fluids goes up or down depending on diet and other influences. When the body becomes acidic, illness or disease is impending or present. An example is when a person has cancer. Therefore, it is best to make the body more alkaline so as to diminish illness.

Cesium Chloride

Cesium Chloride is a highly alkaline element. It is not the dangerous radioactive form of cesium. When ingested in bio-available form, it raises the body’s pH and oxygen content. In order to make Cesium Chloride effective, one must supplement it by ingesting Potassium, Vitamin C, Selenium, and Zinc.

What Cesium Chloride Does to Cancer Cells

Researcher Hans Nieper discovered that Cesium raises the pH of cells above 8 and oxygenates the cells. It limits the intake of glucose in cancer cells, thereby starving them. This diminishes the production of lactic acid, restores cell respiration, and reduces cachexia. Cesium chloride thereby indirectly kills cancer cells and brings pain relief within a few days. For these reasons, Cesium Chloride, with supporting vitamins and minerals, has been used to raise the pH of the body and thereby provide an excellent alternative or complementary treatment or therapy against all forms of cancer. A typical protocol is:

Swallow 3 times daily after meals:

2 grams Cesium Chloride
3 grams Vitamin C
30,000 units Vitamin A
30 mg Zinc Chloride
250 mg Potassium Ascorbate.

Picky Details (Don’t Read This)

The operation of Cesium in killing cancer cells is as follows:

Sodium makes cells retain water, and potassium makes them give it up. They accomplish this by exerting or releasing ionic (electrical) pressure on cell walls, creating channels that facilitate movement of various elements in one direction or the other. They thereby interact in a pumping action, allowing nutrients and toxins to flow through cell walls.

Cancer cells normally operate the sodium-potassium pump approximately 20 times faster than normal cells.

Cesium readily substitutes for potassium in the sodium-potassium pump, but cannot substitute in the potassium channel. This makes the cell retain both the Cesium and Potassium ions. As a result of accumulation of Cesium and Potassium in the cell, their ions cancel the potential gradient across the cell wall, thereby preventing the sodium-glucose co-transport from operating, starving the cell. This process starves cancer cells more quickly than it does normal cells.

Once Cesium a cancer cell it diffuses out through the cell wall very slowly, requiring more than three months for complete evacuation. Meanwhile, the internal accumulation of Cesium and Potassium ions can cause cancer cells to burst and die. It thereby not only kills the cell through starvation, but keeps it from reviving.

Because Cesium causes cells to retain Potassium, it thereby depletes Potassium levels in the blood, even to dangerous levels. For that reason, one must combine Cesium with sufficient Potassium in order to maintain healthy serum Potassium levels.

Other Alkaline Nutrients

Other alkaline nutrients that raise the body pH are:



ElementpH
Potassium14
Sodium14
Calcium12
Magnesium9


In addition, enzymes are alkaline in nature, and certain enzymes are effective not only in raising body pH, but also in making cancer cells recognizable as foreign invaders so that white blood cells can eliminate them. Trypsin and Chymotrypsin are two pancreatic enzymes most useful for this purpose. They dissolve the mucous and fibrin coating that hides cancer cells from the immune system, and thereafter leukocytes and macrophages attack and eat the cancer cells. A diet high in cooked animal flesh conscripts the available Trypsin and Chymotrypsin for digestion, and that is why such diets help to precipitate cancer.

There are other cancer-fighting enzymes in fruit, such as papain in papaya and bromelain in pineapples. Pineapples are also a good source of Potassium.


Oh, By the Way

I just searched the National Cancer Institute web site for Cesium. The only two mentions are of the radioactive form used for radiation therapy. They need to get a life.





Sunday, April 03, 2005

Islam is a Bad Religion - Here's How to Reform It

Letter from Muslim Leader Kamal Nawash

I recently received this from Kamal Nawash, President of Free Muslims Against Terror:

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-general_list@freemuslims.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 1:45 AM
Subject: March Against Terror and For Freedom and Democracy

March Against Terror and For Freedom and Democracy

The Free Muslims Against Terrorism are proud to announce that on May 14th 2005, Muslims and Middle Easterners of all backgrounds will converge on our nation’s Capital for a rally against terrorism and to support freedom and democracy in the Middle East and the Muslim world. This will be the first rally of its kind in Washington DC that is lead by Muslims and Middle Easterners.

Join us in sending a message to the extremists and supporters of terrorism that we reject them and that we will do all we can to defeat them.

We also want to send a message of hope to the people of the Muslim world and the Middle East who seek freedom, democracy and who reject authoritarianism and the use of violence that we are with them and that we will do all we can to support them.

This rally is NOT limited to Muslims and Middle Easterners. All people are welcome to join us. We request anyone and everyone who supports our message to join us at the rally. We want to send a message to the extremists and terrorists that American Muslims, Christians, Jews and people of all faiths are united against terrorism and extremism.

We welcome all endorsers and we ask that you circulate and publish this message to as many groups and people as possible. Help us make history.

Free Muslims Against Terrorism
President@freemuslims.org
http://www.freemuslims.org
202-776-7190
-------------------------------


My Answer to Kamal's Letter

Here was my response to the letter:


Dear Kamal Nawash, President of Free Muslims Against Terror:


I really appreciate your work to unite Muslims against terrorism.

You and I know that, from the example set by Muhammad, Islam teaches hatred and violence against those who resist it. We also know that Islam is as much a force of social regulation and political control as it is a religion.


The Key to the Sins of Islam

You cannot eradicate the evil oppression, theft, torture, and murder from Islam until you do something effective to modify the religious documents upon which it is built. The evil in those documents simply must be excised. If that does not happen, Muslim hate mongers will continue to brew death and destruction in the name of Allah. That is exactly the opposite of what any right-thinking person should want.

So, I have a question for you: Why don't you start upstepping the religion of Islam to a truly benign religion?

Why do I ask this? Because it is obvious that if you don't work to upgrade Islam, rather than merely ignoring the brutality and iniquity in its root documents as you have been doing, you are therefore part of the problem, rather than part of the solution. Marches, and effete political statements are virtually worthless because they don't remove the cause of the problem.


The Cause of Islam's Support of Terrorism

Why are the root documents like the Qu'ran and Hadiths the problem?

1. They contain evil (encouragement to oppress, rob, torture, and murder non-Muslims who resist Islam), and

2. They tolerate the broad interpretation of both ancient and modern clerics as to meaning.

3. Most Muslims, even those who are highly intelligent, see the Qu'ran and Hadiths as being the infallible "word of God", in spite of the evil, superstition, 7th century social stupidity they contain.

Muslims are encouraged by those documents, and by their religious convictions that the documents are bona fide "word of God", to commit acts of murder, mayhem, and terror against non-Muslims.


How to Up-Step Islam

How can you up-step Islam? Well, here are some suggestions.

1. Abandon it in the trash heap of history where it belongs. Islam served a purpose of uniting desert pagans under the banner of monotheism. Now it serves as the laughing stock and object of hatred of right-thinking people all over the world, for it promotes terrorism along with belief in God.

2. Promote the excise of all elements that promote oppression, torture, murder, and holy jihad in the form of war or terrorist acts.

3. Encourage a return to the Gospel, of which Muhammad spoke so highly.


Interestingly, if you read the Qu'ran thoroughly, you do not find the points of that Gospel enumerated, even though Jesus spent his entire public ministry teaching it.

Quick Comparison of Muhammad to Jesus

If anyone had credentials to teach such a Gospel, it was Jesus. When you compare the credentials, words and deeds of Jesus to those of Muhammad, you see a huge difference.


1. Jesus - By Muhammad's own admission in the Qu'ran, and as corroborated by both the modern Urantia Book and the four gospels in the Bible's New Testament, Jesus had better credentials than any other prophet before or since.

a. Was the offspring of God (created by his spirit),
b. Was born of a virgin (Mary),
c. Was a perfect human being
d. Was a creator (made a bird from dust)
e. Was a prophet (spoke for God)
f. Was a miracle worker
g. Was the Messiah (savior)
h. Rose from the dead
i. Is a judge (will decide who goes to Heaven on judgment day)
j. Taught the Gospel (good news plan of salvation)
k. Claimed he was speaking for the Heavenly Father himself.

2. Muhammad - By contrast, Muhammad himself, according to history and his own admission, was intrinsically evil:

a. Was a thief (lead his warriors on raids)
b. Was a torturer and murderer (led his warriors to kill other tribes)
c. Was an oppressor (imposed harsh conditions on society)
d. Was an enslaver (encouraged the keeping of slaves)
e. Was a philanderer (encouraged men to cheat on wives)
f. Was a pedophile (married a 6-year-old girl, consummated the marriage at 9)
g. Was a warmonger (encouraged holy jihad)
h. Was an ignoramus (could not read or write)
i. Was chosen by Gabriel to be a prophet and pass on a revelation.


Considering the above, it is no wonder that Muhammad fomented hatred among backward people. And that makes it all the more surprising that modern, well-educated people of good will, feel it necessary to embrace his teachings while trying to explain away their gross deficiencies, such as those that spawn terrorism and social oppression.

More to the point, the brilliant credentials of Jesus, not to mention the dire warnings of Muhammad that Muslims should embrace the Gospel of Jesus, should impel truth-seeking Muslims to discover what his Gospel actually was.

As I mentioned, you cannot find an enumeration of the points of the Gospel in the Qu'ran, but you also cannot learn it from Christians because they are followers of Paul, not of Jesus. Therefore, let me summarize the Gospel for you and explain why it was such good news for the Jew and pagan religionists of 2000 years ago, as it is for the Muslims of today.


The Gospel

1. The Fatherhood of God - We should accept the fact that God exists, he is our Heavenly Father, we are his children, and he loves us.

Pagans believe in a multiplicity of gods, but Jesus taught there is only one God. Jews and Muslims do not see God as a father, but rather as a sometimes benign and sometimes revenge-seeking deity who will sometimes murder, torture, or torment his subject human beings. Jesus showed through his own behavior what a loving father is like, for he claimed to be revealing the nature of the Heavenly Father to the people around him. And he truly was a loving person.
The point here is that Muslims and Jews, while acknowledging God's love for humans, do not believe that humans can truly become like God. And yet that is what an understanding of the relationship between God and his children Jesus taught leads to. Children can grow up to become like their parents.

2. The Brotherhood of Man - We should believe that all humans are our brothers under God's fatherhood, and so we should love them and serve them unselfishly and lovingly.

Some Pagans see everything as an expression of God, and naturally conclude we have an obligation to show the nature of God to others. However, Jews and Muslims do not believe other humans are their brothers. Jews believe other Jews are their "neighbors". Muslims believe other Muslims are their "brothers."

These beliefs of estrangement from other humans leads Muslims and Jews to feel justified in cheating, oppressing, robbing, torturing, or murdering other non-Jews or non-Muslims, often in the name of God, or just because they feel superior to others. In fact, Muhammad's concept of holy jihad blatantly encourages Muslims to wage war against those they consider to be "unjust" against (resist) Islam.

Jesus, however, taught by example that we should love others, forgive them of their sins against us, and serve them unselfishly and with love in our hearts. Jesus' concept of brotherhood with all other humans forever put to rest any notions that we are entitled by superiority of birth or belief individually to lord it over our fellow humans. Instead, we were charged by Jesus to express the Father's love to them.

3. Faith in Becoming Like God - We should have faith in the effectiveness of the supreme human desire to do the Father's will, to be like God.

Christians, Jews, and Muslims do not believe we can ever be like God. In fact, Christians believe we were all born sinners and only the sacrificial blood of the crucified Jesus can atone for our sin natures. Jews and Muslims believe God can and will punish us in this life. All three groups believe God will punish the sinner or unbeliever in the afterlife by an eternity of hellfire. Many Jews do not even believe in an afterlife.

By contrast, Jesus taught that our progress in becoming like God will be rewarded in Heaven. He intimated that our progress does not end here on earth, but it continues once we get into Heaven, and that we can go on beyond his domain to stand face to face with the Father himself ("No man comes to the Father but by me."). He taught that we earn God's forgiveness by forgiving others. And he taught that we shall live forever by loving God and our fellow humans.

What is the purpose of living forever? The Urantia Book suggests many grand adventures are in store for us, commensurate with our abilities. Where do we get these abilities? By working diligently to bear the "fruits of the spirit," just as prodigiously lifting weights will enable us to lift ever greater weights, to the limit of our individual capacities.

The implication is that we ourselves may someday be sent on missions of grave universe import to the evolving worlds of outer space, in the name of God. As Jesus seems to many humans as an incarnation of God, perhaps we shall be similarly seen by outer space humans of the far away future if we are true to our trusts.

Jesus clearly indicated it is important that we seek personal perfection in our daily lives, that we show God's love to others, and that we be devoted to the Father's will. What is all this discipline of ourselves about if not to train us become more like God? And of what merit is that if not to be a more powerful and perfect expression of the nature of God to others at some future time?


Why the Gospel is So Magnificent for Muslims

Ambitions such as those embodied in the above three points of the Gospel are way beyond those enjoined in the religious texts of Jews and Muslims which tell people to be "good" so they won't be punished by God. The lure of the divine carrot is missing from those texts.

That carrot-lure is the prospect of being like God and with God in eternity, not simply to hang around Heaven and frolic with angels (as Christians and some Jews suppose), or to be waited on hand and foot by and have sex with virgins (as Muslims suppose). Rather it is to be the ambassador from and embodiment of God to future willed creatures on future worlds in the vast reaches of time and eternity. Who can imagine a grander adventure than that? Preparing us for such an adventure is the long-range purpose of our lives here on earth.

Up-stepping Islam, as well as the other religions of our planet, to such a vision is not just a good idea. It is mandatory. And that won't happen by simply ignoring the negative and bad parts of our religions. We cannot merely excise the bad parts from them, for even the good parts are largely blind and limited in scope. Even Christianity is so far from the religion of Jesus - the Gospel he lived and taught - that his religion is barely recognizable in the muck of the atonement doctrine.

In my opinion, the only right action is to abandon those archaic religions with their pagan roots and embrace a new religion based on the Gospel Jesus taught. Then we will not have to apologize or explain away inconsistent and illogical assertions that God encourages his children to oppress, rob, torture or murder one another for this or that reason, or that people should proclaim a sacrificial murder of a perfect, divine human being as an act of atonement condoned by God.

If you want to up-step Islam, the best way to do it is to read the Urantia Book, embrace the Gospel Jesus taught and lived, and encourage all your fellow Muslims to do the same. The enlightened among them will leave Muhammad's faulty seventh-century notions of religion as an instrument of social regulation and political control in the dustbin of the past.

# # #

The Cost of Illegal Immigration

Executive Summary
The USA is facing a Civilizational Crisis in the unchecked importation of illegal immigrants. This article explains how many lack the intelligence to compete for good jobs and therefore resort to crime and welfare abuse to get by. It shows how dependence on cheap immigrant labor discourages the production of machines and supporting infrastructure that keeps our civilization alive and prosperous.


How Illegal Immigration is Threatening the Survival of our Civilization

The Social Cost of Illegal Immigrants
When considering an illegal immigrant for employment (such as your housekeeper), recall that a 1997 National Academy of Sciences study found that an immigrant with less than a high school education will on average cost the taxpayers $100,000 more in government spending over her lifetime than she will pay in taxes.

You might also think about that when you are being pressured to increase the minimum wage.

To some people’s thinking, upping the minimum wage is necessary because it makes unnecessary the above-mentioned $100,000 spent by the government in support of the unschooled illegal immigrant (via medical services, welfare, education, and imprisonment cost for the criminals among them).

While we’re at it, let’s not forget that if the illegal immigrants were not here in the USA, they wouldn’t be taking Americans’ jobs. That means Americans would have to do them, and since Americans are spoiled into thinking they deserve higher wages that such jobs are now worth, employers would have to pay higher wages to get the jobs done, thereby making such jobs more valuable.

Then, more low-wage Americans will be clamoring for them, and no minimum wage laws would be necessary. It serves us well to remember that minimum wage laws were made necessary by the huge influx of illegal immigrants from south of the border.

The Impact of Low IQ
Let’s also not forget that the average IQ of Mexicans is 87. That’s just two points above the average IQ of American Negroes, putting Mexicans and Negroes in virtually the same category of intelligence, or ability to solve problems. Their general lack of ability to solve life’s problems results in their general inability to earn a high school diploma. Fifty (50)% of black American children fail to graduate from high school. Mexicans do a little, but not much, better.

Where do they go from there, if not to the lowest paying jobs? The US Government’s 2000 census gives a hint. 7% of the black population (and 10% of black males) is incarcerated at any given time. Non-whites comprise about 60% of the prison populations, in spite of being less than 35% of the population. And guess who foots the bill for this. Illegal immigrants?

No way, José.

With the current mollycoddling attitude about illegal immigration in Washington, I don’t see illegal immigration from south of the border shrinking any time soon. Meanwhile, thousands of illegal immigrants enter the USA every day. Those who cannot or will not get illegal jobs (yes, it is illegal to hire illegal aliens) resort to crime or welfare abuse.

Moreover, the low IQ problem is getting worse because of the imbalanced rates of procreativity between low-IQ groups and high-IQ groups. Blacks and Mexicans in America procreate at upwards of 4 children per family, while the more intelligent Northeastern Orientals and Caucasians procreate at less than 2 children per family. According to UN statistics, a procreation rate of 2.7 children per family is necessary to perpetuate a racial group.

With this decline of the brain trust of America, where will we get our future geniuses of finance, business, medicine, industry, science, and education? From a burgeoning gene pool that has an average IQ in the middle 80’s?

No way, José. If this trend does not get reversed, such as by limiting the prerogatives of procreation of lower IQ people, American civilization is doomed to become like those of Mexico or Central Africa. That is not a bright future.

The Impact of Immigrant Labor on Industrial Progress

One lesson of history since the start of the Industrial Revolution 250 years ago is that countries don't advance economically by importing unskilled workers to "do the jobs that natives won't do," but by substituting machines for human labor.

For example, because the Roman Empire exploited countless slaves conquered in foreign wars, it lacked incentives to increase labor efficiency through mechanization. Productivity never took off, and eventually the civilization collapsed into poverty.

In contrast, Britain, which, until the second half of the 20th Century, had far more emigrants than immigrants, had the right incentives for an Industrial Revolution.

And now the Japanese have become obsessed with the promise of robots. In part, this is because the Japanese think their mountainous islands are quite crowded enough without admitting millions of immigrants. Japanese officials recently compiled a report predicting that every household in Japan will own a robot by 2015.

In contrast, the US has largely abandoned a commitment to higher productivity and labor savings, and has instead begun sending manufacturing jobs to China and white collar jobs to India and the Philippines, while illegally importing millions of uneducated workers to perform rudimentary service jobs here.

For example, although previous generations of Americans had vastly increased the productivity of workers on Midwestern grain farms, efforts to mechanize California fruit and vegetable farms were largely abandoned over five years ago, because immigrants were cheaper … to the corporate farmer, although not to the country.

It’s true that robotics have not taken America by storm as Robert Heinlein predicted in his 1957 novel The Door into Summer. He assumed cheap labor would go the way of the mastodon. He did not predict the disastrous effect of the 1965 Immigration Act that made it more economical to use immigrant labor than to develop robotic machines.

Summary: Gloom and Doom
The picture of the future is clear. Because of our obsession with illegally importing cheap labor and our refusal to regulate procreation of lower IQ people, we are dooming the USA to and its civilization to extinction. It will take a wise president indeed to reverse these stultifying trends. I don’t think such a critter exists in among Democrats and Republicans.

Friday, March 18, 2005

Maria's Oprah Drawer

My wife Maria loves her "Oprah Drawer."

An Oprah Drawer is for women only, though I don't really know why it should be.

For those of you who don't know, an Oprah Drawer is a spare drawer in a bureau or chest that a woman commandeers for stashing her loot - odds and ends of things she buys in the mall or when out and about, or receives as gifts. It's not for ordinary things, but rather for things she really likes, way down in her secret heart.

And it's all brand-new.

The reason for the Oprah Drawer is to replace the givingness of an attentive husband. It was invented by Oprah Winfrey, who, as we all know, has no husband to give her sweet, intimate loot of the kind that women like. Besides, most men are not sensitive enough to what titillates a woman's fantasies and fancies, so they would never be competent, unless they are gay, to buy the right loot for that drawer.

So, the woman buys it herself, stashes it, and then when she's feeling ignored, diminished, ill-treated, down, blue, lost and isolated in the universe, or specially deserving for, she treats herself to a pre-known gift from that special drawer. Suddenly, her day is brighter, her night more romantic, and a smile graces her inner heart of hearts. She knows she is loved and dear to someone - herself. And, she knows something else: she really doesn't need a man to bring her little gifts that lift her spirits and make her happy.

Leave it to a filthy-rich single black female super-TV-Daytime-Talk-Show-Star to come up with such a gimmick.

I have to admit the Oprah Drawer is practical. It's great for a woman to stash received gifts she won't use right away. It's wonderful to know a gift is handy if the husband or boyfriend forgets to buy her one. And it serves the woman well when she's too rushed to go out and buy a gift for another woman.

There is a certain diplomacy and politic associated with the Oprah Drawer. It's perfectly okay for a man to look in it and see what's there. It might give him gift ideas by showing him what not to buy for the woman. It's considered "bad form" for a man to sneak a gift from the drawer and hand it to her as though he just bought it. But hey, it's not such a bad idea, if you can get away with it.

Since I'm a man, I don't feel a bit jealous of the booty Maria keeps in her Oprah drawer, nor of the fact that she didn't commandeer and stock with loot an Oprah drawer for me. Men aren't that interested in that kind of drawer. And, making an Oprah Drawer is an individual's own responsibility because no one will do it for you.

Besides, men far prefer to have sharpened knives, oiled and cleaned guns, ammunition, trinkets and doodads from the past, old pre-marriage wallets with the condom imprint in the worn, misshapen leather, some wrist watches that are too good to throw and too old to give away, a deck of cards or dice he used to gamble with, a little humidor with a few prized cigars he might get to smoke on the back porch when the wife's not around, or a smutty photo or two from an old flame to remind him he used to be really attractive to women.

Men might prefer it, but they almost never commandeer a whole drawer for such things, not as long as there's a woman in charge of the household. Instead, they rathole their loot in the back of their underwear or sock drawer, at the back of the nightstand drawer, high up on a closet shelf the wife's not likely to reach, or in a special trunk or cardboard box tucked away in the attic, basement, garage, or tool shed. If men have loot, it is in an out-of-the-way place, away from the wife's prying fingers and scrutinous, judgmental eyes. For men know the wife's likely to snatch, toss, or "lose" the man's cherished booty, especially if she sees it every time she opens a drawer that's as boldly comandeered as her Oprah Drawer.

Back to the subject, Maria's Oprah Drawer (I just looked) is loaded to the brim, and I fully expect her to commandeer another as a companion to the first one. On a cursory look, I found several glossy Victoria's Secret gift bags, some designer soap I bought for her at a craft show, a whole stack of t-shirts, a bottle of perfume, a teddy bear bean bag, an address book with a cover made from a giant leaf, and an assortment of tidy bundles in plastic, tissue, or bags of some kind that I didn't have the patience to explore. Oh, and I caught a glimpse of the red Chinese brocade jewelry pouch I made for her. Bottom line, the drawer has lots of nice things in it, as it should have.

Frankly, I'm glad Maria has an Oprah Drawer, and I recommend it for all women. It's an extension of her "nesting" nature, and it does nurture her as much as anything inanimate can. Plus, I love to see the look of serene contentment on her face when she treats herself to something from the Oprah Drawer. I notice that sometimes when I'm busy with something that does not interest her, she goes back into the guest room and reorganizes the drawer, carefully removing everything, laying it out on the bed, grouping the items, unwrapping them, feeling them, smelling them, occasionally showing an item to me with a happy smile on her face, and then just as carefully re-wrapping, organizing, and snugly stashing her loot back in her Oprah Drawer.

Oprah Drawer. It's a good thing.


# # #

My Sewing Adventures


Elegant Bridal Satin and Chinese Brocade Jewelry Pouch with Nylon Drawstring, Perfect for Pearls - $25 While Supply Lasts



I don't exactly remember how the bug bit me, but it bit hard, the sewing bug did. That was last summer, 2004. It started when Maria bought some cute jeans that were too long and asked me to hem them.

Just a few days before, our next door neighbor Margaret had moved to Atlanta and abandoned a lot of her household stuff to the Salvation Army. The army was a week late getting there, so the scavengers beat them to it. I was one of the scavengers, and my choice of the pickings included an old steel White brand straight-stitch sewing machine, the kind my mother had when I was growing up in Houston. Margaret was old enough to be my mother, so it figures she'd had that machine for at least 50 years. Now it was mine.

So I hopped to the task, setting up the machine on the floor of the guest room and hemming Maria's pants beautifully. Her delight encouraged me. I broke one of the two needles in the process.

A week or so later I was browsing through Wal-Mart, thinking I needed a new needle for backup. Lo and behold I spied a computerized Brother CS150 (150-stitch, including zig-zag) sewing machine for $240, about $100 off. I snapped it up, along with a few pieces of fabric and some needles and spools of thread, and lugged my booty home. Maria was surprised, pleasantly. She knew I would be doing all the sewing, and so far, she's right.

My first project was to make some draw-string bags from the feed-sack fabric my Aunt Wilda had given me in August 2004 when I visited her in Houston. I thought they were nice, but would be much nicer made from satin.

I asked sister Debbie to send me her little Chinese Jewelry pouch as a guide, and when it arrived, I decided I could re-engineer it and make something much nicer. After thinking it over and drawing and cutting some patterns, I headed to Jo-Ann's Fabrics and bought some beatiful, heavy white bridal satin, and some red Chinese brocade with golden trees and dragons woven in, along with matching thread.

I cut out a bunch of bags and started sewing. Maria snagged the first couple for her "Oprah Drawer," and another for her personal use. Immediately she stuffed her pearls in the personal one, and I liked the combination so well that I took a few pictures like the one above. You can see more at http://bobhurt.com/bags.

If you like the looks of the bags, let me know. I have a few left. They are for sale at $25 each. If you prefer something custom, I'll be happy to accomodate you. I enjoy making the bags, and I've never seen any that are nicer.


Pouch Ties Snugly Shut with Drawstrings, Keeping Jewelry Protected. Email me if you want it for a loved one or your own Oprah Drawer.


# # #

Wednesday, March 16, 2005

Why Florida Schools Suck, and How to Fix Them

I am completely incensed over the handling of public education in general, and politicos don’t seem to have their acts together on the subject. Constitutional amendments regarding voluntary free pre-school for 4-year-olds or reducing class sizes don’t solve the problems in any way. All are completely missing the point.

Florida public schools are ineffective, and are turning out graduates who are barely literate. If you ask a typical school child what he learned in school, he does not know and cannot explain it. The fact is that if a child cannot explain what he has learned, then he has not learned it, does not know it, and cannot use it, so his "education" was both faulty and wasted. The reasons for such an ineffective educational system are not class size or insufficient pre-school. They are partly the incompetence of teachers induced by principles of tenure, and the fact that students do not spend enough hours per day receiving instruction and studying, or enough months per year learning how to prepare for adult life in the outside world.

Florida public schools do, however, turn out millions of children every day at 2 PM to run the streets, go home unsupervised, and get involved in drugs, sex, and street crimes. Why? Because for the preponderant majority of students there are no parents waiting at home to greet them - those parents have to work for a living and simply cannot be home at 2 PM.

To make matters worse, parents of families in which all adults work must pay exorbitant fees to day care centers that send their kids to school for them, pick the kids up from school for them, and take care of them till parents get home. The fees are around $75 per week during school months, and $140 per week during non-school months. A parent can easily drop $4500 per year to keep a child in day care throughout the year. Most single parents cannot afford that hefty "working parent tax". And that is why there are so many derelict kids running the streets of Florida.

Let us assume that there are 1 million kids in Florida whose parents work, and each parent pays around $3000 year for child care during school months. That means $3,000,000,000 (3 billion) is being spent to take care of kids. That money should be going to the school system instead of to baby sitters, and those kids should be getting a better education for that money.

Am I claiming that schools are nothing more than a baby-sitting service? Yes, I am. Let's face it. If all parents could do a superlative job of educating their children at home, there would be no need for a public education system. And, it is necessary to observe and supervise children in the process, imposing discipline and ensuring the children do not cause or receive injuries. So, being a baby-sitting and education service go hand-in-glove - they are the warp and woof of our system of public education system, and the only real purpose and function of that system.

Therefore, I have a simple proposal for improving the education system that none of the candidates or school boards seem to have any inkling about -

Extend the school day to 11 hours - 7 AM to 6 PM, and do all homework, study, band, football, intramural activities, teaching, eating, rest, and play needed by healthy children during that time. This will abolish "home work". It will allow parents who work the opportunity to be home to send their kids to school, and receive them back from school. And, it is a GOOD idea because if the daily schedule is orchestrated correctly, children will not get bored or over-worked, and they will learn more. School administrators will work teachers 12 hours per day 3 days per week, and two shifts will teach the students. This will give teachers plenty of slack time during the week.

Extend the school week to 6 days, Monday through Saturday. Children do not need an extra day at home to goof off and be useless.

Extend the school year to 11 months, with all schools being closed during the month of August. This will allow parents and children a full month of vacation opportunity, and provide ample time for school renovations if needed. It will also keep the kids occupied gainfully during the months of June and July which are now wasted as far as education is concerned.

Require all teachers to take a sabbatical - a year off every 7 years to learn new techniques new facts about their subjects, tour the world, work some other kind of job, or just get a breather.

Require all teachers to teach students to teach other students, and require all students to pair up with and teach junior students the materials they have already mastered. This will dramatically reduce the work load on teachers, reduce the number of actual teachers needed, and get the kids used to the fact that it is their responsibility to help those younger or less able than themselves, a characteristic badly needed in our communities.

What cannot be seen cannot be controlled. The general public has no idea how well students in classroom, school, or district lots, are doing. That is because their statistics are not broadly visible, and those that are visible are impossible for the typical parent to understand. Thus, the public cannot evaluate or correct teacher and student performance. To fix this, change teacher compensation so that base pay is barely enough for subsistence, and bonuses are earned by statistical results demonstrated by the kids they teach. Each child should be tested for knowledge BEFORE learning a subject, and AFTER learning it. The results should be charted and visible for all to see. If the kids show that they are learning and CAN USE the material in practical ways, then the teachers get a higher rating and earn their bonuses. This system will quickly weed out the incompetent teachers without bias, prejudice, or politics, and tenure will not protect a bad teacher. This educator's pay system will attract the more excellent teachers from other states, for bonuses should bring them $50,000 to $100,000 annual compensation for their skills. Let's be frank about this: schools exist for the students and the society, not to be a convenience for teachers. Public schools should challenge the best teachers to compete hard for the opportunity to teach, and the dregs should be summarily thrown out. With this system, the dregs will leave of their own accord because they simply cannot compete. The entire system will stimulate all teachers to give their jobs the best they have to offer.

Include free school breakfast and lunch for all students, and use only fresh, uncooked, organic nuts, fruit, berries, grains, and vegetables. Instead of paying for expensive cooking equipment, use natural uncooked preparation techniques, and dehydrators to make "unbaked" cookies. Such a diet will not be offensive to any religious or cultural group, for it is the common denominator of all human racial, religious, and cultural groups, and it is HEALTHY. Do not serve meat at schools, but provide vegetable protein sources. Schools can outfit their kitchens with large commercial juicers and feed the children rations of fresh raw organic fruit, berry, vegetable, and nut milk juices twice a day. Meals can included whole bulgar grains that have been soaked overnight to soften them suitably for eating, fresh sprouts, and nuts. The benefits of this kind of food are lowered expense of equipment, improved health, vitality, alertness, and mental acuity of children, and lowered medical bills. Once the system is well established, food costs will normalize to be a little higher than they presently are, but that cost will by far be offset by reduced preparation and healthcare costs. It is important for schools to feed the children and not to allow parents to send food to school with the kids, not to allow the kids to eat at outside places like MacDonald's, for any foods other than the above will be relatively deleterious to the child's health and ability to learn. Furthermore, unless a doctor's statement specifies otherwise, all children should be required to consume one ounce of pure water per two pounds of body weight during the school day. This will help children to remain alert, and it will make them healthier and less susceptible to disease while it improves alimentary functions.

Correct the unsightly appearance of school children by establishing and sticking to high standards of grooming and attire: no long hair, moustaches, or beards for boys, and no baggy pants, short shorts, untied shoes, low-cut or revealing blouses, unnatural hair colors, "weird" hairdos, or visible body piercing other than ear rings. I am not suggesting children be "uniform", but that they be "united" in looking and dressing attractively rather than like ghouls, skateboard bums, or people "on the make". They are being prepared for life "out in the world", and they should be expected to dress and look in school similar to what is acceptable in the business world, and pleasing to prospective employers. Their fashion should not be a source of distraction to other students. If students want to "stand out and be noticed", then they should do it with scholastic (academic, sport, etc) performance, not by acting or looking salacious, gothic, beachy, and so on. Aside from practical rules like these, teachers have iron-fisted control over whether a student is allowed in class with a particular "look", and the school should provide smocks and hair coverings that students who come to school with unacceptable clothing are required to wear. All unacceptable items of jewelry (nose, eyebrow, and other piercings) that are visible should be confiscated and destroyed, as a matter of both policy and practice. The state should supply standard uniforms and haircuts to any students whose parents cannot or will not send their children to school looking decent.

Allow all students to participate in ongoing school projects that are commercial enterprises geared toward raising money to defray school expenses. Examples are for-pay services that really do compete against similar services in the community that might cost more money. This allows the community itself to benefit from and inexpensive source of labor. It also allows the students to deploy their talents, education, and group skills in serving "customers", thereby preparing them for a "real" job outside of school. And, just as important, it actually will reduce taxes while it does good for the community. The schools should also involve students in similar, balanced group projects that provide charitable services for the needy in the community. This will teach students to have a life balance between self-maintenance, self-improvement, and helping others. School children should spend part of their educational time getting real-life work experience under school supervision in areas of manufacture (making their own computers and furniture), farming (producing the food served at school), and business arts. School factories, farms, and workshops will be an enormous boon to American society, economically and socially.

Stop putting stupid or misbehaving students in the same schools and programs as the smart students. Take a hint from the highly successful classical education system in Germany, and direct stupid students into vocational schools rather than academic schools. When children misbehave incorrigibly and cannot be corrected early, they should be sent to schools for misfits so they won’t sap the supervisory and teaching resources the better students so desperately need and will more prodigiously and beneficially use. City schools should not have “honors” classes. The entire school should be devoted to “honors” or advanced academics, and the students who don’t qualify for honors classes should be sent to completely different school intended for the lower achievers. This will allow the brighter, better-behaved students to get a better education, and the relatively stupid or miscreant students to get an adequate education.


It does not take a genius to see the benefits of the above plan. Children will be healthier, smarter, better balanced, more presentable to the community, and better prepared to enter the work force. Because they will learn so much more in less calendar time, they will be able to graduate from what we consider to be "high" school by the age of 14. This will chop 3 years of expenses off the state-sponsored "free" public school education students now get, a savings of about 25% of the present cost Furthermore, it will let the students become adept at training their juniors, a skill much needed in industry.

Personally, I think students should graduate at 14 and then be forced to choose either an apprenticeship program (if academically inept) or an academic program of 2 to 4 years to prepare them for university or a school of special skills like computer programming, lab technician, and so on, and that these also should be state-sponsored, but allowed to earn money in competition against normal commercial businesses. This will drive up the levels of expertise employers have reason to expect from graduate job applicants, and it will lower the cost of lower skill activities. It will demand that the work force in the state be elevated in skill level and make them far more competitive and effective at their jobs.

After all, isn't that what school is all about?

Why Christianity is Becoming Pagan

http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=28468

This response is a little late, but it will always be timely. The article rightly complains that demons of the left and in the USA government are destroying the God orientation of American Christians and reducing their religions to Paganism.

The real complaint seems to be that the governments of the world pass laws outlawing expressions of devotion to God in association with government sponsored gatherings (like roll-call at schools), while they ban expression of revulsion at such blatant immorality as government-sanctioned gay unions, or being Gay at all.

Meanwhile, what society offers is: witchcraft, New Age theology, Gothic paganism, Satanism, Green-religion ecology, and every weird cult of religion-like expression imaginable, to supplant the waning Christianity.

I believe the author of WND's article is correct. These horrific things ARE happening, and most people don't know or care, or openly advocate them. I have not read the Whistleblower article that explains the way back, but I have my own views on the subject.

First of all, let us define "pagan". From Webster and New World Dictionary.

pagan

adj : not acknowledging the God of Christianity and Judaism and Islam [syn: heathen, heathenish]
n : a person who does not acknowledge your God [syn: heathen, gentile, infidel]; heathen; idol-worshiper.
Usage: Pagan, Gentile, Heathen. Gentile was applied to the other nations of the earth as distinguished from the Jews. Pagan was the name given to idolaters in the early Christian church, because the villagers, being most remote from the centers of instruction, remained for a long time unconverted. Heathen has the same origin. Pagan is now more properly applied to rude and uncivilized idolaters, while heathen embraces all who practice idolatry.

Clearly, a Pagan is not monotheistic, or does not believe in a single great god of truth, beauty, and goodness. Consequently, non-pagan religion must be monotheistic, and it must see its single deity as supreme over all other powers, and as the creator of all things including human life, and the bestower of human mind, personality, and "spirit".

Therefore, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are all non-pagan religions, and for the most part, all other world religions are pagan.

A non-pagan religion can have pagan roots. For example, before Melchizedek appeared to found Salem (present day Jerusalem) and cultivate his relationship with Abraham, the people of Palestine were pagan. They worshiped multiple deities, idols, and fearsome anomalies of nature. They sacrificed human beings and animals to appease their gods. They paid tribute of livestock, crops, and money to have priests act as intercessors and save them from the wrath of their gods for their wrongdoings and shortcomings. They thought they could "buy" God's favor. After Melchizedek (the "angel of the Lord" made his covenant with Abraham, Abraham founded a new monotheistic religion, the beginnings of what is now called Judaism, and the root religion of both Christianity and Islam.. However, all three religions retained the pagan roots inherited from the extant religions of their day in that area of the world.

You might say that evolved religion (incorporating worship of objects and anomalies of nature, idols, multiple gods, and sacrificial activities to appease those deities) ALWAYS has a deleterious effect on revealed religion, and that eventually they homogenize into some worldly religion that embodies both truth and falsehood. Sometimes the resultant religion is far from of the original revealed religion, so much so that members of the resultant religion will utterly reject, and even murder, a new revelator who comes from Heaven to set things right again. That is what happened when Jesus arrived to straighten the world (and Judaism) out.

A non-pagan religion can and does, therefore, keep elements of its pagan ancestry, giving it all the earmarks of paganism, but still remaining monotheistic. That is what happened to Judaism (which miraculously has dropped the practice of animal sacrifice, but still does not see God as our loving Heavenly Father), and Christianity (which kept the pagan ritual of sacrifice but transferred all its weight to the relevance of the death of Jesus), and Islam (which for the most part embraced the gospel of Jesus, but retained the early Hebrew notions of God as being a powerful and vengeful deity who somehow still loves his earth children, but punishes them harshly for wrongdoing - still not a loving Heavenly Father).

So, why would anyone say Christianity is becoming more pagan? Perhaps it is because the religion is not gratifying, and, knowing no better, people seek gratification in other corners.

When a religion is gratifying intellectually and spiritually, people generally do not seek religious expression elsewhere. It is obvious that many people do not see Christianity as gratifying. As a result they do not teach their children to be Christians, and they do not "practice" Christianity themselves.

There are many reasons Christianity is not gratifying to actual and would-be Christians:

1. Its plan of salvation is the only real reason most people would be interested in a religion. Unfortunately, it is insulting to intelligent truth-seekers, and it has been for nearly 2000 years. It requires that a person profess belief that Jesus is Lord and that Jesus died as a human sacrifice to atone for our sins. There is nothing wrong with seeing Jesus as our creator or universe sovereign, but the idea of sacrificial atonement is purely pagan.

a. The principle of atoning sacrifice was certainly never taught by Jesus himself (anyone who studies the four gospels hard will find no direct teaching of Jesus to support such a fallacy).

b. The principle is insulting to the concept of a Loving Heavenly Father - no loving father would condemn his own son to death, particularly not when that son was both humanly perfect AND a divine being nearly the Father's equal.

c. No sacrifice of any kind, particularly not a human sacrifice, could possibly buy the favor of a just God. A just God, if he punishes anyone at all, punishes people only for their own sins, not the sins of someone else. The idea of sacrifice is a pagan concept that one can live an unrighteous life, and then pay a bribe of some kind to the gods in order to purchase atonement for the unrighteousness. Even the most backward of Americans recognize the criminality of the attempt to bribe a government official. There is no higher government official than God himself. Thus, offering a sacrifice is an affront to God because it is an attempt to bribe him.

d. God certainly would not issue commandments and then expect his children to live by them while he openly flouts them. An order to murder Jesus so as to atone for the sins of others in an open flouting of the commandment "Thou shalt not kill".

e. The roots of sacrificial atonement go back to pagan practices that began way before Abraham, or even Adam and Eve. Even Abraham, as enlightened and intelligent as he was, nearly murdered his first-born son, Isaac, as a human sacrifice. It took 500 years before Moses abolished that absurd Hebrew practice and replaced it with ransom payment to the priesthood. It took another 1500 years before Jesus abolished all forms of sacrifice with his bread and wine sacrament, a substitute for murdering sacrificial creatures. Christianity seeks to perpetuate the belief in a pagan ritual of sacrifice, and that is both an insult to God and to those who would believe in his sublime goodness.

f. In reality, God has never required a sacrifice so that people can atone for their sins, and the reason is that no sacrifice can or could suffice as a bribe that God would accept in lieu of righteousness. One could reasonably assert that the only sacrifice God will accept is the sacrifice of giving up unrighteous behavior. To many people that is indeed a demanding sacrifice, but that is only because they are not familiar with the purity of joy in righteous living. Jesus brought orders directly from God to man when he said "Be you therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in Heaven is perfect". That command implies perfection is possible (otherwise, why bother commanding it?) for every normal minded human being, to the extent of one's perfection capacity. God's capacity for perfection is limitless, but ours is profoundly limited. As we grow intellectually, physically, and spiritually, however, our capacity increases as we exercise sincerity. In other words, we can be relatively perfect - relative to our capacity therefor. While we might not always know what is right, as long as we sincerely attempt to think, say, and do what is right, we are being relatively perfect, and our path will lead us ultimately toward absolute perfection. A relatively perfect person, although sinless, might still make honest mistakes. If we were to define "evil" as "mistaken" we might say Man has an evil nature, but not a sin nature. One purpose of human life is to come to terms with that and strive to be perfect.


2. Christianity is A religion ABOUT Jesus, not THE religion OF Jesus. As such, it can be considered another errant cult among the many that assert they teach the absolute truth while nearly completely sidestepping it. According to the bible:

a. Above all, Jesus lived and taught a perfect religious life, and became the inspiration for all people who suffer and desire to know and live the truth. His life therefore, is an example of living the truth to all people on all worlds. He was courageous, cheerful, poised, well-balanced, unified, and consummately devoted to doing the Father's will: pursuing truth, beauty, and goodness in thought, word, and deed. He lived his "religion", just as he taught it.

b. Jesus taught that people should love God, and love, forgive, and unselfishly serve our fellow humans. He taught that if we do these things, we will live forever, have our sins forgiven, and have a high estate in Heaven. He demonstrated a profound and living faith in the goodness of God and confidence in man. His exhortation to be of good cheer, to be perfect, to be sinless, to forgive others without limit, and to be devoted to a relationship with God, showed faith in the effectiveness of the supreme human desire to be like God. He indicated that any one who sincerely approaches God in this way will not be disappointed. That is his personal plan of salvation.

c. Jesus asserted that he brought new truth to the world. Even before ordaining his apostles in his Sermon on the Mount (turn the other cheek, carry the burden an extra mile, let your light so shine that others know you are his followers), he went about teaching the above "Gospel". But what could that Gospel be? If you ask the typical Christian today what the "Gospel" was, you do not get 2b above as the answer. Because the four gospel records of his life and teachings do not specifically enumerate the above points of Gospel, preachers and teachers are left to construe the writings of the followers of Jesus as though they have equal or even superior weight to the actual teachings of Jesus himself. The brilliantly classic example of this is the atonement doctrine. It could not have been part of the Gospel Jesus taught because Jesus never mentioned his death to the apostles until upwards of three years into his public ministry. Even 8 months before his death, when descending Mount Hermon after the transfiguration, the apostles were dumfounded at his pronouncement that he was going to be killed by the Jews. Clearly, neither his death nor the significance thereof, had anything at all to do with that Gospel.

d. Just before disappearing from view for the final time (ascending into Heaven), Jesus delivered his "Great Commission" to his apostles and to all who would call themselves his followers. He told them to go into all the world teaching all he had commanded. In other words, he told them to spread his religion - the religion OF Jesus. Fundamentally, that religion is outlined in 2 b above (complete references to scripture are available on request). And yet, just a few hours later, after Jesus' personal spirit presence, the Spirit of Truth, the "comforter", was "poured out on all flesh", Peter enthusiastically rallied his hundred or so associates in the upper room, took them down to the Temple Court, and preached his unforgettable and fiery sermon on the "risen Christ". In one sweeping episode, he swept aside the gospel Jesus had inculcated into them and taught for 4 years both directly and in parables, and supplanted it with a new religious cult based on the resurrection of Jesus, not on the Gospel itself.

e. The apostle Paul followed suit. In spite of his repetition of the platitudes of loving and being good to others, he submerged the actual gospel of Jesus beneath his personal religious philosophy, partly Jewish, partly Mithraist, partly Greek Philosophy, partly Jesusonian, and with the keystone of a plan of salvation based on the sacrificial death of Jesus to atone for man's sins due to the sin nature inherited from Adam and Eve. The codification of this cult belief in Paul's letters and the book of Hebrews completed the suppression of the Gospel Jesus lived and taught, and it is the backbone of Christianity today.


3. Although the Gospel elements that are residual in Christianity are the reason it has grown to the extent it has, Paulist cult beliefs and practices are holding Christianity back from proper expansion in the modern world.

a. Most unbiased, intelligent truth seekers recoil at the atonement doctrine as being illogical and portraying a picture of God as being mean, unjust, vindictive, unforgiving, and anything other than the God of Love both Jesus and Isaiah taught about.

b. When they challenge fundamentalist Christian preachers and theologians on the irrational atonement doctrine, they receive the response that the atonement doctrine must be true because the whole bible is true, and that is because the bible is the infallible, inerrant word of God, inspired by the Holy Spirit.

c. After hearing this, they protest that the bible is loaded with errors, not the least of which is the creation story - no way was the universe of universes created in 6 earth days.

d. Then they receive a barrage of attacks such as accusations that they are trashing the bible, that they are disputing God's word, and often even worse. Those in a congregation who question it are often given the cold shoulder, accused of being heretics, and excommunicated or ostracized. Such behavior toward them is anything but Christian.

e. In other words, Christians can only maintain the atonement doctrine is true if they maintain the whole bible is true, and that alone is enough to drive unbiased, intelligent, educated truth-seekers into a tailspin. Christians themselves have a hard time with their own tenets, a fact that has produced upwards of 400 different denominations and sects.


4. As if that were not enough, Islam is alive and well, outgrowing Christianity both in the USA and internationally, and many of its proponents are deadly intent to eliminate all religions on the planet aside from Islam. Islam represents an enormous threat to Christians and Christianity because both are strongly based in hard-sell recruitment for garnering new members, and because Islam is militant to the point of being a direct enemy to all other religions.

a. In some ways, Islam is more loyal to the gospel teachings of Jesus than is Christianity. It makes devotion to God (praying 5 times a day) one of its main principles. It extols the virtue of brotherhood with fellow believers much more than does Christianity. It makes caring for the poor and orphans one of its main tenets. It provides social regulation that upsteps more primitive cultures. And it is highly moral, in spite of the primitive methods of many groups of its adherents in enforcing that morality. For these reasons Islam is attractive to converts seeking discipline in a religious practice, and appeals to downtrodden people and prisoners who desire strength and safe havens among a community of fellow believers...

b. True, there are many problems with Islam. It is still struggling with its 7th century roots and it is being dragged kicking and screaming in protest into the modern world. It promotes holy wars, offering heavenly rewards to those who die in combat against injustice. It offers no concept of God as a Heavenly Father, but sees him as a tyrant who is benign to those who do his will and viciously mean to those who do not. It demeans women and makes them second class citizens. Its social regulations are grossly out of date and do not serve a modern world adequately - many if not most of the regulations are the province of government rather than a religion. It is oppressive to women and non-Muslims. Many of its adherents are openly militant toward non-Muslims and non-Islamic governments. For these reasons Islam appeals to violent people and finds its fastest rates of conversions in prisons and among primitive peoples in strife-torn lands.

c. In the Qu'ran, Muhammad recants much about Jesus and Mary, and even elevates Jesus above Muhammad in terms of divine characteristics, claiming that Jesus was perfect, a creator, and born from the spirit of God himself. Although Muhammad rightly complains that Christians had not been true to the teachings of Jesus, he blatantly warns Muslims that they are to adhere to the Gospel of Jesus or suffer severe chastisement. Muhammad does not attempt to iterate the tenets of the Gospel, and so most Muslims wrongly tend toward the belief that the Qu'ran's teachings are a restatement of the Gospel.


5. Both the Bible and the Qu'ran contain the seeds of the salvation of Christianity, and that is the Gospel message Jesus taught and lived.

a. All Christians need to do in order to resurrect the esteem they once had in the minds of average citizens of America is to become what they never have been: devoted practitioners of the religion OF Jesus instead of a religion ABOUT him.

b. Jesus did command his followers to teach his commands to all nations. It is time for Christians to start doing that. The actual Gospel is so simple, sweet, logical, and fun that people of all races and creeds will have little if any trouble accepting it... if only the purported followers of Jesus will learn it and start teaching it as Jesus commanded.

c. All Muslims need to do in order to get their own religion on the right track is to discover the Gospel of Jesus as outlined in the biblical records of his life and teachings, and set them as supreme over all their other beliefs. After all, Muhammad did command them to do it, and promised painful punishment to those who resist it.


When Christians start becoming followers of Jesus, students of his teachings, and adherents to his personal religion of devotion to God's will, love for God, love for fellow humans, and delivery of unselfish loving service to others, then will they find themselves friendly to all other religionists, particularly to Muslims, and then will the lives they live become clarion calls for truth seekers and beacons of golden light in the new-age pagan darkness for those seeking peace of mind, spiritual tranquility, and harmony of relations among peoples.

The Gospel of love, forgiveness, and service is positively irresistible, and the vestiges of that gospel in Christianity and Islam are the only reasons people anywhere find either Christianity or Islam remotely acceptable as bona fide religions. Christians will do well to note that religion means "devotion to supreme values", and that the pursuit of greatest value in the universe is the quest to know, love, and be like God. That value pursuit is the core of the religion of Jesus. Refocusing on the religion OF Jesus will bring converts to a transformed Christianity in droves, and new-age paganism will die the quick death it deserves.

# # #

Saturday, December 18, 2004

Sourdough Bread

Bob Hurt

I love making bread. Yesterday I made 4 loaves of sourdough, egg-washed and sprinkled with sesame seeds, then roasted toasty and golden brown. Maria went nuts over it, and made us a hoagie out of the the smaller baguette.

My sourdough starter is not really all that sour. I made it myself and feed it flour and water every couple of days, after drinking the "hooch" liquor off the top. The hooch has plenty of alcohol in it, and the liquid collects on the top of the starter after it sits a day or so. I started the starter from commercial yeast mixed in with 50-50 flour-water and a couple tablespoons of sugar. After fermenting for a week it began to get a sour taste, but it still is not like the sour taste of real sourdough starter. Maybe I should add some vinegar to it...

Anyway, I mixed 4 cups of bread flour, two cups of starter, and a cup and a third of pure water together to make a sticky batter, and set it in the fridge. 14 hours later I removed it, let it sit for 2 hours to warm up, mixed in 4 tsp salt and a cup of bread flour, and kneaded it in my cuisinart for 5 minutes.

Then I tried forming it into loaves for the final rise. That did not work. The loaves just slumped into a flat shape. So, I kneaded in another cup of bread flour and a little salt. Then I was able to form it into loaves, two in oiled bowls, and two in a baguette baking form. I turned the oven light on, covered the loaves with oiled plastic wrap, and set them into the oven to rise.

Two hours later they looked big enough, so I removed them, cranked the oven temp to 450, and waited 45 minutes. My oven does not get to 450, but it does make it to 400. I stuck the baguette form in and plopped one of the bowls upside down on the baking stone. When I removed the bowl, the glutinous blob slumped down into the shape of a fried egg yolk. I shut the oven door, and 15 minutes later removed the loaves, brushed them with 50-50 milk/egg mix, sprinkled them with sesame seeds, and popped them back in. 20 minutes later I removed the baguettes, a rich, roasted, goldish brown. 10 minutes later I removed the rounded loaf which had risen nicely during cooking. I then cooked the remaining blob in the same way.

Now, as I write this, Maria brings me another hoagie made from the remaining baguette. I'll take it back into the kitchen to douse it with oil and vinegar, salt, pepper, and some oregano flakes. Yummy.

Tuesday, November 02, 2004

Helloooow

My buddy Tom Roper seems enamored of Michael Moore for some reason. I don't get it. Nearly every sentence out of Moore's mouth or pen is a distortion of the truth or an outright lie. Where's the romance coming from?