Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Gospel Discussion 2012


Note:  I have published this article in PDF form at
 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/96866950/Gospel-Discussion-2012

Bob Hurt's Introduction
I have focused on the Gospel for years.  I have found the Christians and Muslims give lip service to it but cannot articulate it meaningfully.  Muslims think the gospel is spread throughout the Koran.  Christians think it has to do with belief in Jesus' sacrificial death and resurrection.  This would not bother me so much but for the resources both groups waste on relative nonsense, proselytizing on the one hand and murdering on the other. 

Meanwhile families across America and around the world languish from lack of two-by-two visitation that knowledge of the gospel inspires.  Urantia Book Enthusiasts and Evangelists (UBEES) have less excuse than ANYBODY for such negligence, for they have the most beautiful story the world has ever heard to impart to the languishers.

So, I have made it a point to try to bridge the gap between Christians and UBEES by identifying the essential elements of the gospel from the red words of Jesus in the Bible which The Urantia Book also endorses.  I then tell Christian fellows the equivalent of this:

"So, you believe in Jesus and his gospel, right?  Would you mind articulating that gospel?  Give me its tenets from the teachings of Jesus."

They cannot do this of course because they know only Paul's teachings as the gospel. So when they stumble around, I start presenting the scriptures from Jesus' red words in the King James Version of the Bible, and take them step by step to the understanding of that Gospel.  Some want to know more.  Some reel in shock.  Preachers tell me I'll burn in hell. Some rail against me from the pulpit.  Some walk or run away muttering to themselves or praying to God for my lost soul.  But, it plants the seed of awareness that the preachers' preachers have misled or lied to them.  And eventually that seed, nurtured a bit, will grow into a mighty oak of interest in advanced truth - The REAL Gospel that Jesus taught and lived.

I have demonstrated the first part of this approach in "Gospel Discussion 2012", a document I posted at http://www.scribd.com/doc/96866950.  I have appended it below and attached it in PDF and ODT formats.  Word, LibreOffice, and OpenOffice should open the ODT file.    Please feel free to download and use it in your evangelism efforts.  It might even work on Muslims.

Why will it work?  Because THEY think they are experts in the hard core fundamentals of their religions.  And they both THINK they know the gospel.  But they don't.  So, when you tell them they need to know the gospel they think they believe, that challenges them to learn it. 

You will probably suffer a backflash of resistance, annoyance, resentment, etc.  But don't let that disappoint or worry you.  Just tell them that the family resemblance between them and their Heavenly Father is unmistakable. 

Say this:  "You're becoming just like your daddy."  Then walk away with that thought fresh in their minds.

Please send any refinements and suggestions to me.  I don't hide.  I respond just fine to well-founded criticism. The truth can always withstand honest investigation, can't it?
Bob Hurt (full contact info below)
B U a UBEE?  I B.

Gospel Discussion
An Evangelist Evangelizes An Evangelist - Will Bob Hurt Burn in Hell?

Bob Hurt's Original Message to Brent Parker

Subject:
Gospel
Date:
Mon, 11 Jun 2012 22:17:53 -0400
From:
Bob Hurt, Evangelist <bob@bobhurt.com>
To:
A. Brent Parker, Evangelist <a.brentparker@gmail.com>


Brent:

Thanks for the phone msg.  I have been an evangelist of sorts for many years.  I adhere to the gospel Jesus taught and lived, not to the religious philosophy of Paul.  Now I know that you as an evangelist of Paul's religious philosophy might not appreciate my views and position on Paul's teachings in contrast to those of Jesus, so I write to explain and justify my position with proofs from the writings of both Paul and Jesus.  I figure all Christians believe the red words of Jesus over anybody else's words. 

I do not mean to say that Paul just lied to everybody for the heck of it.  He included many principles of Jesus' teachings in his religious philosophy.  But, he developed that religious philosophy in order to harmonize Judaism with the Greek philosophy of Plato and Philo (Google them) , and the teachings of Jesus.  First and foremost, though, he was a Jew and believed Judaism and the whole law of Judaism.  And in the harmonizing process he sacrificed his loyalty to truth in favor of loyalty to Judaism and its pagan roots (human sacrifice to appease God).

And that sacrifice did not appeal to Jesus' followers who had known him and heard him teach.  But Paul tried to hide this reality.  In Acts and Galatians you read about the blinding incident where the voice told Paul to go to Damascus and get instructions.  Then he traveled to Arabia, but he doesn't say where, then back to Damascus.  HE fell out with Peter in Jerusalem, and with John Mark in the first mission.  Why?  He claims he had a dispute with Peter over circumcision, etc, but fails to say why he went to Arabia or what happened and what happened between him and John Mark.  The answer:  he learned the real gospel in Arabia at Philadelphia where Mary, Martha, Lazarus, and Andrew had fled after Jesus died and the persecutions heated up in Jerusalem.  They founded a church loyal to  the teachings of Jesus (the only one truly loyal, according to Revelation)

Revelations 3 – Jesus liked the church at Philadelphia

6 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches.

7 And to the angel of the church in Philadelphia write; These things saith he that is holy, he that is true, he that hath the key of David, he that openeth, and no man shutteth; and shutteth, and no man openeth;

8 I know thy works: behold, I have set before thee an open door, and no man can shut it: for thou hast a little strength, and hast kept my word, and hast not denied my name.

9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.

10 Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth.

11 Behold, I come quickly: hold that fast which thou hast, that no man take thy crown.

12 Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, [which is] new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and [I will write upon him] my new name.

Luke tells the story of Paul falling out with John Mark on Paul's first missionary journey. Why? Because John Mark DID NOT AGREE with Paul's version of the gospel. You see, John Mark had been a young teenager during Jesus' public ministry and he hung out a lot with Jesus and the apostles, tagging along with them on preaching adventures. HE KNEW THE GOSPEL of Jesus INTIMATELY, having heard it through parables and many conversations. So, when Paul started preaching his conglomerated religious philosophy, John Mark objected strenuously, and they split up as a result. John Mark would have no part of Paul's aberrant teaching.


Acts 15 – John Mark abandoned Paul's false gospel

35 Paul also and Barnabas continued in Antioch, teaching and preaching the word of the Lord, with many others also.

36 And some days after Paul said unto Barnabas, Let us go again and visit our brethren in every city where we have preached the word of the Lord, [and see] how they do.

37 And Barnabas determined to take with them John, whose surname was Mark.

38 But Paul thought not good to take him with them, who departed from them from Pamphylia, and went not with them to the work.

39 And the contention was so sharp between them, that they departed asunder one from the other: and so Barnabas took Mark, and sailed unto Cyprus;

40 And Paul chose Silas, and departed, being recommended by the brethren unto the grace of God.

41 And he went through Syria and Cilicia, confirming the churches.

In 1 Cor 9  Paul admits that he'll say whatever he must to convince people, just to win.  In Rom 7 he admits that he does what he shouldn't.  In Gal 1 he claims only HE tells the authentic gospel, even while John Zebedee still lived and preached.  And he might have lied about not meeting other apostles, particularly since he went to Arabia (Philadelphia) where Lazarus' family and Andrew had escaped during the persecutions.  Also, take note that John the Baptist's dozen apostles who signed on with Jesus after JtB's death, served as preachers of the gospel in Idumea during Jesus' public ministry, which is why Jesus never bothered going here to preach.  Some of them met up with Lazarus' family in Philadelphia too.

Why?  Because that town and synagogue warmly received Jesus durin his last preaching tour before raising Lazarus from the dead.

1 Corinthians 9 – Paul will prevaricate in order to win

18 What is my reward then? [Verily] that, when I preach the gospel, I may make the gospel of Christ without charge, that I abuse not my power in the gospel.

19 For though I be free from all [men], yet have I made myself servant unto all, that I might gain the more.

20 And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law;

21 To them that are without law, as without law, (being not without law to God, but under the law to Christ) that I might gain them that are without law.

22 To the weak became I as weak, that I might gain the weak: I am made all things to all [men], that I might by all means save some.

23 And this I do for the gospel's sake, that I might be partaker thereof with [you].

24 Know ye not that they which run in a race run all, but one receiveth the prize? So run, that ye may obtain.

Romans 7 – Paul has severe moral and ethical weakness

14 For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.

15 For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.

16 If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that [it is] good.

17 Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.

18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but [how] to perform that which is good I find not.

19 For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.

20 Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.

21 I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me.

22 For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:

23 But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.

24 O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?

Galatians 1 – Paul curses John for preaching the real gospel

6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:

7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.

8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.

9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any [man] preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

10 For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ.

11 But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man.

12 For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught [it], but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.

13 For ye have heard of my conversation in time past in the Jews' religion, how that beyond measure I persecuted the church of God, and wasted it:

14 And profited in the Jews' religion above many my equals in mine own nation, being more exceedingly zealous of the traditions of my fathers.

15 But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother's womb, and called [me] by his grace,

16 To reveal his Son in me, that I might preach him among the heathen; immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood:

17 Neither went I up to Jerusalem to them which were apostles before me; but I went into Arabia, and returned again unto Damascus.

18 Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode with him fifteen days.

19 But other of the apostles saw I none, save James the Lord's brother.

20 Now the things which I write unto you, behold, before God, I lie not.

21 Afterwards I came into the regions of Syria and Cilicia;

22 And was unknown by face unto the churches of Judaea which were in Christ:

23 But they had heard only, That he which persecuted us in times past now preacheth the faith which once he destroyed.


But let me take you back to the beginning of the altered gospel Paul taught:  the fiery sermon of Peter on Pentecost after Jesus' final appearance.

Acts 2 – Peter's Pentecost sermon substitutes resurrection for gospel

14 But Peter, standing up with the eleven, lifted up his voice, and said unto them, Ye men of Judaea, and all [ye] that dwell at Jerusalem, be this known unto you, and hearken to my words:

15 For these are not drunken, as ye suppose, seeing it is [but] the third hour of the day.

16 But this is that which was spoken by the prophet Joel;


And then he tells the abridged Hebrew history, then this:
22 Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know:

23 Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain:

24 Whom God hath raised up, having loosed the pains of death: because it was not possible that he should be holden of it.

25 For David speaketh concerning him, I foresaw the Lord always before my face, for he is on my right hand, that I should not be moved:

26 Therefore did my heart rejoice, and my tongue was glad; moreover also my flesh shall rest in hope:

27 Because thou wilt not leave my soul in hell, neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption.

28 Thou hast made known to me the ways of life; thou shalt make me full of joy with thy countenance.
Do you see what happened?  He FORGOT the marching orders Jesus had just given him earlier that day:

Mark 16 – Jesus says to preach his gospel to all everywhere

14 Afterward he appeared unto the eleven as they sat at meat, and upbraided them with their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they believed not them which had seen him after he was risen.

15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.

16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.

Matthew 28 – Jesus orders us to teach all nations and observe his commands

17 And when they saw him, they worshipped him: but some doubted.

18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.

19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, [even] unto the end of the world. Amen.

I ask you this:  WHERE DID JESUS TELL HIS FOLLOWERS TO PREACH ABOUT THE RISEN CHRIST? 

Answer:  NOWHERE.  But Peter preached that, not the Gospel, in his Pentecost sermon.  Right then and there PETER began warping the RELIGION OF Jesus into a religion ABOUT Jesus.

Then later, Paul, continued the warping to you see the convoluted mess in Hebrews which he probably authored, and at least inspired.

And then Paul has the gall to declare in Galatians 1:8 that only HIS warped gospel is the real gospel, and any other gospel (including the real gospel Jesus spent his public ministry and gave his life proving) is false.

Maybe Paul meant well, but he set the gospel back at least 1500 years.  And so BAD A JOB DID HE DO that the gospel message nearly died completely but for the efforts of monks to keep it alive in the dark ages.

Then, suddenly, a light from Heaven...  a Philadelphia missionary told the gospel to Muhammad and set him on fire in the 7th century AD.  And you can see its tenets in the first three pillars of the 5 pillars of Islam -  There is one God, Pray 5 times a day, Give alms to the poor and succor to the suffering.  And you can verify by reading the beautiful things Muhammad said about Jesus and the Gospel in the Qur'an.

Surah 5 – Muhammad honors Jesus and the Gospel

    And we followed up the footsteps of these (prophets) with Jesus the son of Mary, confirming that which was before him and the law, and we brought him the gospel, wherein is guidance and light, verifying what was before it of the law, and a guidance and an admonition unto those who fear.

    Then let the people of the gospel judge by that which is revealed therein, for whoso will not judge by what God has revealed, these be the evildoers.

    We have revealed to thee the Book in truth verifying what was before it, and preserving it; judge then between them by what God has revealed, and follow not their lusts, turning away from what is given to thee of the truth.

    For each one of you have we made a law and a pathway; and had God pleased He would have made you one nation, but He will surely try you concerning that which He has brought you. Be ye therefore emulous in good deeds; to God is your return altogether, and He will let you know concerning that wherein ye do dispute.

    Wherefore judge thou between them by what God has revealed, and follow not their lusts; but beware lest they mislead thee from part of what God has revealed to thee; yet if they turn back, then know that God wishes to fall on them for some sins of theirs,- verily, many men are evildoers.
    ...

    But did the people of the Book believe and fear, we would cover their offences, and we would make them enter into gardens of pleasure; and were they steadfast in the law and the gospel, and what has been sent down to them from their Lord, they should eat from above them and below them. Amongst them are a nation who are moderate, but many of them- bad is what they do.

    O thou Apostle! preach what has been revealed to thee from thy Lord; if thou do it not thou hast not preached His message, and God will not hold thee free from men; for God guides not people who misbelieve.

    Say, "O people of the Book! ye rest on naught until ye stand fast by the law and the gospel, and what is revealed to you from your Lord." But what has been revealed to thee from thy Lord will of a surety increase many of them in rebellion and misbelief, vex not thyself then for a people who misbelieve.

    Verily, those who believe and those who are Jews, and the Sabaeans, and the Christians, whosoever believes in God and the last day, and does what is right, there is no fear for them, nor shall they grieve.

    They misbelieve who say, "Verily, God is the Messiah the son of Mary;" but the Messiah said, "O children of Israel! worship God, my Lord and your Lord;" verily, he who associates aught with God, God hath forbidden him Paradise, and his resort is the Fire, and the unjust shall have none to help them.

    They misbelieve who say, "Verily, God is the third of three;" for there is no God but one, and if they do not desist from what they say, there shall touch those who misbelieve amongst them grievous woe.

    Will they not turn again towards God and ask pardon of Him? for God is forgiving and merciful.
    ...

    On the day when God shall assemble the apostles and shall say, "How were ye answered?" they will say, "We have no knowledge; verily, thou art He who knoweth the unseen." When God said, "O Jesus, son of Mary! remember my favours towards thee and towards thy mother, when I aided thee with the Holy Ghost, till thou didst speak to men in the cradle and when grown up.

    "And when I taught thee the Book and wisdom and the law and the gospel; when thou didst create of clay, as it were, the likeness of a bird, by my power, and didst blow thereon, it became a bird; and thou didst heal the blind from birth, and the leprous by my permission; and when thou didst bring forth the dead by my permission; and when I did ward off the children of Israel from thee, when thou didst come to them with manifest signs, and those who misbelieved amongst them said, 'This is naught but obvious magic.' "And when I inspired the apostles that they should believe in him and in my Apostle, they said, 'We believe; do thou bear witness that we are resigned.'" When the apostles said, "O Jesus, son of Mary! is thy Lord able to send down to us a table from heaven?" he said, "Fear God, if ye be believers and they said, "We desire to eat therefrom that our hearts may be at rest, and that we may know that what thou hast told us is the truth, and that we may be thereby amongst the witnesses." Said Jesus the son of Mary, "O God, our Lord! send down to us a table from heaven to be to us as a festival,- to the first of us and to the last, and a sign from Thee,- and grant us provision, for Thou art the best of providers."

    God said, "Verily, I am about to send it down to you; but whoso disbelieves amongst you after that, verily, I will torment him with the torment which I have not tormented any one with in all the worlds." And when God said, "O Jesus, son of Mary! is it thou who didst say to men, take me and my mother for two gods, beside God?" He said, "I celebrate Thy praise! what ails me that I should say what I have no right to? If I had said it, Thou wouldst have known it; Thou knowest what is in my soul, but I know not what is in Thy soul; verily, Thou art one who knoweth the unseen. I never told them save what Thou didst bid me,- 'Worship God, my Lord and your Lord,' and I was a witness against them so long as I was amongst them; but when Thou didst take me away to thyself Thou wert the watcher over them, for Thou art witness over all. If Thou shouldst punish them, verily, they are Thy servants; if Thou shouldst forgive them, verily, Thou art the mighty and the wise." God said, "This is the day when their confession shall profit the confessors, for them are gardens beneath which rivers flow, to dwell therein for ever and for aye." God is well pleased with them, and they well pleased with Him; that is the mighty happiness.

    God's is the kingdom of the heavens, and the earth, and all that is therein, and He is mighty over all.

*****************

So, you see, Muhammad seemed to have his act together pretty well, identifying Jesus as a creator, coming from the spirit of God, being the presider over judgment day, and the gospel constituting something people ought to believe. But of course, Muslims cannot articulate the Gospel any more than Christians can.

The Three Tenets of the Real Gospel by Jesus

I have told you that the gospel inheres in three tenets:
  1. Acceptance of the fact of the sovereignty of God - he is our loving Heavenly Father, we his children;
  2. Belief in the truth of the brotherhood of man - we should love and serve one another unselfishly and lovingly;
  3. Faith in the effectiveness of the supreme human desire to become like God - to do his will, for through sincerity alone we can eventually become like him in behavior, to the extent our inherent capacities and antecedent conditions allow.
I do not have to work very hard to prove to you that Jesus taught and lived the foregoing principles throughout his public ministry, but he did not even mention his death till shortly before he got arrested, and did not mention his torture till the descent from Mt Hermon from the transfiguration, and did not mention his serious persecution till the "Get thee behind me" incident about 3.5 years into his public ministry. Thus his death had NOTHING to do with the gospel, and so, neither did his resurrection.

As to the real Gospel, Jesus started teaching it immediately after selecting his apostles:

Matthew 4 – Jesus taught the gospel early in his public ministry

17 From that time Jesus began to preach, and to say, Repent: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.

18 And Jesus, walking by the sea of Galilee, saw two brethren, Simon called Peter, and Andrew his brother, casting a net into the sea: for they were fishers.

19 And he saith unto them, Follow me, and I will make you fishers of men.

20 And they straightway left [their] nets, and followed him.

21 And going on from thence, he saw other two brethren, James [the son] of Zebedee, and John his brother, in a ship with Zebedee their father, mending their nets; and he called them.

22 And they immediately left the ship and their father, and followed him.

23 And Jesus went about all Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, and preaching the gospel of the kingdom, and healing all manner of sickness and all manner of disease among the people.

24 And his fame went throughout all Syria: and they brought unto him all sick people that were taken with divers diseases and torments, and those which were possessed with devils, and those which were lunatick, and those that had the palsy; and he healed them.
But you have noted, I hope, that Jesus commanded his followers (and by extension that means you and me) to teach his COMMANDS and his GOSPEL to all creatures and all nations (Mark 13, Mt 28). Either you believe that and you will follow it or you won't. Personally, I have decided to follow it. So, let me cover this issue just a little more with some proofs.
About 40 years ago I decided to switch from "Hard core Christian" to "Hard Core Jesusonian."  I see a huge difference between the two that could matter a lot to the future of the planet.

A Jesusonian rivets attention on the religious life of Jesus and how he lived it, not on the religious philosophy of Paul.  And there you have the substance of the difference.

And yet, underlying Christian Tradition (Paulism, for want of a more descriptive term), the precious gospel that Jesus taught and lived lies so, SO close to the hearts and minds of Christians who really cannot articulate it and whose Paulist beliefs keep them from confessing their loyalty to it.

And such an admission, I predict, will someday pull Hard Core Christianity out of the mud of its pagan roots of human sacrifice and put it into the sunshine of Jesus' most important teachings:

Man must embrace Sonship with God in order to enjoy "salvation."

That's the Gospel in a nutshell.  One approaches that Sonship through embrace of the above three Gospel tenets above.
Do you see this?  People love you ONLY because of the divinity they see in you.  We show our "God-ness" to others through loyalty to truth, beauty, and goodness.  We demonstrate it through acts of love, mercy, and ministry.  Look directly at Jesus' admonitions and exhortations:
  • You live forever by loving God and your fellow humans (Luke 10:25-28)
  • You obtain the Father's forgiveness through forgiving others (Mt 6:14, 15)
  • You must love and unselfishly serve others (John 13:15-17; 34-35)
  • You must spread the above gospel to everyone everywhere (Mt 28:19-20)

As you can see, I did not invent this gospel.  I just bring you the message, with crystal clarity, unlike ANYBODY has ever done for you before, EVER.

So,  if you want to get HARD CORE about something, get that way about spreading the above gospel to everyone, the way Jesus commanded.  Basically, you have already received your hard core orders from him.  I just remind you of them.

Do YOU transgress the "Word of God" when you fail to spread the above Gospel as Jesus told his apostles (and by extension, all of us) to do?  Maybe you could TEACH THAT GOSPEL to others in your church (from the pulpit) and newsletters.

I hereby call on you to DO THAT, EXACTLY THAT, spread that gospel.  No, Jesus did not tap me on the shoulder or whisper in my ear and say "You go say that."  I just recognize in you the qualities of a good evangelist and I know you have the ability to influence a lot of Christians to turn their loyalties and teaching efforts to the Gospel message of Jesus.

I hope you let the seed germinate, that you water with your missionary zeal and fertilize it with your hunger for truth, and you harvest it in preachments to your fellow old-timey church associates, and especially in those seeking for the real meaning of Christ's adventure on this planet.

Take to heart this story of the training days of the disciples:

Luke 9 – Jesus explains how to spread the gospel in your town

1 Then he called his twelve disciples together, and gave them power and authority over all devils, and to cure diseases.

2 And he sent them to preach the kingdom of God, and to heal the sick.

3 And he said unto them, Take nothing for [your] journey, neither staves, nor scrip, neither bread, neither money; neither have two coats apiece.

4 And whatsoever house ye enter into, there abide, and thence depart.

5 And whosoever will not receive you, when ye go out of that city, shake off the very dust from your feet for a testimony against them.

6 And they departed, and went through the towns, preaching the gospel, and healing every where.

From this I have surmised that we might best spread our FoGBoM (Fatherhood of God, Brotherhood of Man) Gospel by offering to help others.  When we meet folks we ought to ask, "What troubles or difficulties do you have in life?"

We should encourage them to talk with us PAST their social veneer, and then encourage them by letting them know that they can become just like God by embracing God as their Heavenly Father and accepting their Sonship with him, if they truly desire and sincerely act, to the extent their antecedent conditions and inherent capacities allow.

For most people, that is absolutely ASTOUNDING NEWS because so many Christian proselytizers tell people they are sinners and will die in their sins if they don't accept Jesus as a human sacrifice for their sins.

How to Become Indistinguishable from God

Jesus pointed out nearly 2000 years ago, and I point out now, that everyone who sincerely acts in faith can become so much like God others cannot distinguish between them and God.
  • ",,,he that hath seen me hath seen the Father" - John 14:9

And we ought to take his own mission to heart as we go about our life's work:
  • "And he said unto them, I must preach the kingdom of God to other cities also: for therefore am I sent." Luke 4:43
And remember these commandments from Jesus:
  • "Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in in Heaven is perfect" - Mt 5:48
  • "sin no more" - John 5:14, 8:11
  • Forgive your brother "unto seventy times seven" - Mt 18:22
  • "A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another. " - John 13:34

Would Jesus have commanded these things if his followers did not have the capability of doing as he commanded?  Should we take the commands lightly or act sincerely on them while we take his gospel messages to others so desperately in need?

Right or wrong, I spend most of my waking hours showing unselfish loving service to others.  Why?  I can't help it.  Something inside me makes it irresistible.
  • "The kingdom of God cometh not with observation: Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you." - Luke 17: 20-21
I hope you realize that in presenting my views about the real gospel, I have given full deference to the teachings of Jesus over any other purported expert in the Bible.  If you want scriptural support for that decision, just ask.  And I have intentionally refrained from denouncing the bible as an unreliable source reference because of
  • its sketchy history
  • its utter lack of credentials
  • the lack of any divine authority for its selection and production
  • its gross inconsistencies of purported fact
  • its contradictions to historical fact
  • its obvious editorialization, especially among the four gospels
  • its blending of the secular history of the Hebrews with purported relation and paganism
  • its dealing only with the affairs of the Middle East, as though nothing of spiritual worth happened elsewhere in the world

The Age of Reason – Horrifying to Christians, but Worth Understanding

To the end of abject honesty, I commend the sincere Bible student to reading of Thomas Paine's three-volume Age of Reason, ca. 1794-1810.  While you can read it online, I have attached a pdf rendering hereto for your study.  Paine makes many declarations which I consider unfair, for he well knew that the bible contained a selection of writings discovered and jealously protected for centuries, with considerable alteration by the Hebrew scribes and later Christians for consistency with their pet beliefs at the time. He knew one ought to approach a bible study as a feast on a banquet table, some prepared by figurative cave men, french chefs, and enlightened nutritionists of 2000 or more years ago.  One carefully selects the nutritious fare and does not eat the plates and centerpiece.  If one has half a brain.  But if Paine didn't do anything else, he let the Bible prove itself monumentally errant from cover to cover.

I personally believe the essential facts of Jesus birth, life, teachings, and death, but I see obvious editorializations in the four gospels, and know that their unknown authors of Matthew, Mark, and John did not write those documents till 30 or more years after Jesus' death.  Memories fade.  And modern criminologists have proven the unreliability of eye-witness testimony.  So even those who witnessed the recorded events probably recounted them wrongly.  Nevertheless, I believe the core of Jesus gospel AS I HAVE RECOUNTED IT ABOVE.

And out of kindness to you, I haven't condescended by stuffing Age of Reason in your face as proof of the Bible's errors.  Instead, I appeal to the Bible itself to show the REAL gospel Jesus taught, and that Paul, wittingly or not, perverted it.

In the end, you now know both sides of the issue:  Paul's and Jesus'.  Now you can do what I did 40 years ago:  choose.
--

Brent Parker Responds to Bob Hurt

On 06/11/2012 11:39 PM, A. Brent Parker wrote:
You're in grave danger of hellfire Bob. Take care.
Sent from my iPhone

Bob Hurt Responds to Brent Parker

Brent:

Please tell me you can do better than threatening me with hellfire.   I have shown you from Jesus' own teachings the gospel that he lived and died in loyalty to, RIGHT FROM THE RED WORDS in the bible that you say you believe.

For a snapshot overview, here is Jesus'
Plan of Salvation, right from his teachings:

Matthew 6 - forgive others if you want God's forgiveness

14 For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you:
15 But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.

Mark 12 - Love God and your neighbors to enter the Kingdom of God

 28 And one of the scribes came, and having heard them reasoning together, and perceiving that he had answered them well, asked him, Which is the first commandment of all?
29 And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments [is], Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord:
30 And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this [is] the first commandment.
31 And the second [is] like, [namely] this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these.
32 And the scribe said unto him, Well, Master, thou hast said the truth: for there is one God; and there is none other but he:
33 And to love him with all the heart, and with all the understanding, and with all the soul, and with all the strength, and to love [his] neighbour as himself, is more than all whole burnt offerings and sacrifices.
34 And when Jesus saw that he answered discreetly, he said unto him, Thou art not far from the kingdom of God. And no man after that durst ask him [any question].

Matthew 22 - loving God and your fellows is the source of Jesus' religion

36 Master, which [is] the great commandment in the law?
37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
38
This is the first and great commandment. 39 And the second [is] like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.

Luke 10 - You will live FOREVER if you love God and your fellows

25 And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?
26 He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou?
27 And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself.
28 And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live.

Mark 9 - Humble yourself like a child and serve others

35 And he sat down, and called the twelve, and saith unto them, If any man desire to be first, [the same] shall be last of all, and servant of all.

Matthew 7 - Strive to do the Father's Will

21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.

Matthew 12 - Join Jesus's family by doing the Father's Will

50 For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother.  

Jesus of Nazareth's Red-Word Plan of Salvation

This looks pretty clear to me.  You live forever by loving God and your fellows, and God forgives you if you forgive others.  Let's see...
  • Join Jesus' family by doing the Father's will - Mt 7:21, 12:50,
  • Obtain God's forgiveness by forgiving others - Mt 6:14, 15, and
  • Live forever (in Heaven) by loving God and others - Luke 10:25-28

...
That looks a lot like SALVATION to me.  Why doesn't it look like salvation  to you?  Why do you say that if I believe those direct, unequivocal, repeated teachings of Jesus I am in "grave danger of hellfire?"

I have given you the words of Jesus himself.  Please show me HIS words that prove otherwise, so I can use them to correct my errors of understanding.  I don't believe Jesus taught two opposing gospels, do you?

I look at Jesus as the SUPREME authority on this world, not as the Heavenly Father, but as our creator and the one whose approval we must have to go to the Father.  So I see him as SENIOR to Paul (who never knew him or heard him teach) and senior to Jesus' apostles and other followers in EVERY RESPECT. 

Do you remember the "Great Commission" in Mark 16 and Matthew 28?  Doesn't that apply to all people for all time?  Don't you have the obligation to evangelize with the gospel Jesus taught - the simple reality that God is our Father, we are each others brothers, and we should strive to become like him - to do his will?

PUT YOUR FINGER ON THE RED WORDS. Examine your own preachments in contrast to those red words. Then, please tell me WHO stands in danger of hell fire for not heeding them.
And please share with me any positive benefit to anyone for ignoring them.  Can you prove a better  scheme for getting to Heaven? If you can, please show me where Jesus endorsed it.

Here's an idea.  If you can't come up with anything substantive, send this message to the smartest Christian Bible scholars to answer the above questions.  Encourage them to contact me directly with answers.



--
Bob Hurt
2460 Persian Drive #70
Clearwater, FL 33763-1925
(727) 669-5511
Visit My Home Page  ·  Email Me  ·  Visit My Blog
Learn to Litigate with Jurisdictionary (Buy Now)
Stay informed with Lawmen E-letter (Subscribe Free Now)
Donate to my Law Scholarship Fund.

Phone App
reads tag

Thursday, May 31, 2012

Failing Foreclosure Defenses (Quiet Title, CDS) - Are you the Dog or the Dog Meat?

Failing Foreclosure Defenses (Quiet Title, CDS) -  

Are you the Big Dog or the Dog-Meat?

by Bob Hurt, 31 May 2012 - Distribute immediately far and wide to all mail lists.

Many foreclosure defense "theorists" in non-judicial foreclosure states argue that winning a quiet title lawsuit will eradicate the mortgage debt, or that CDS (Credit Default Swap) or other insurance payoffs will eradicate the mortgage debt because payment by the borrower of the mortgage debt would constitute wrongful double payment.

Case law dictates otherwise, as it should:



  1. "A plaintiff cannot quiet title without discharging the mortgage debt. Aguilar v. Boci, 39 Cal.App.3d 475, 477 (1974) ("the cloud upon his title persists until the debt is paid");

  2. "Plaintiffs argue, ‘any alleged obligation of Plaintiffs was satisfied once the default was declared, because the various credit enhancement policies paid out making any injured party whole.’ According to Plaintiffs, foreclosure on the Property to collect on payment owed under the First Note will result in a double recovery prohibited by Virginia statute and case law...Even assuming that Plaintiffs had a factual basis for their "double recovery" claim, no provision in the U.S. or Virginia Codes supports Plaintiffs' argument that credit enhancements or credit default swaps ("CDS") are unlawful. No decision from any court in any jurisdiction supports such a claim.”

    "Plaintiffs' double recovery theory ignores the fact that a CDS contract is a separate contract, distinct from Plaintiffs' debt obligations under the reference credit (i.e. the Note). The CDS contract is a "bilateral financial contract" in which the protection buyer makes periodic payments to the protection seller. See Eternity Global Master Fund Ltd. V. Morgan Guar.Trust Co., 375 F.3d 168, 172 (2d Cir. 2004). If the credit event occurs, the CDS buyer recovers according to the terms of the CDS contract, not the reference credit. Any CDS "payout" is bargained for and paid for by the CDS buyer under a separate contract. See In Re Worldcom, Inc. Sec. Litig., 346 F. Supp. 2d 628, 651 n. 29 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) (explaining that a premium is paid on a swap contract to the seller for credit default protection, and if the default event does not occur, payer has only lost the premium). CDS do not, as Plaintiffs suggest, indemnify the buyer of protection against loss, but merely allow parties to balance risk through separate third party contracts. Therefore, Plaintiffs' "double recovery" argument fails as a matter of law." LAROTA-FLOREZ v. GOLDMAN SACHS MORTGAGE CO., 719 F. Supp.2d 636 (E.D.Va. 4-8-2010).

All foreclosure defenders should try to remember the US Constitution Article I Section 10 Clause 1 , which provides, among other things, "No State shall... pass any... Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts..." 

Stop and think what this means, and ask yourself come questions, whether you are a foreclosure victim, or victim of an upsidedown mortgage loan: 


  1. If the state cannot pass law impairing obligation of contracts, does that mean the state courts' judges therefore have no authority to interpret any law as impairing the obligation of contracts?  
  2. Can a judge rule that your mortgage and note are invalid or void, and if so, why?
  3. May judges willy-nilly impair the obligation of contracts, such as with a spurious quieting of a title on which the equitable owner owes a whopping mortgage debt to the legal owner? 
  4. Does a judge have the authority to determine whether a contract contains unconscionable provisions or otherwise has a void or unenforceable nature?
  5. What about fraud or tortious conduct or other violations underlying a contract?
  6. May a judge determine that some fraud vitiated the contract, making it of no effect?
  7. May a judge find a breach of contract and use that as the basis for ordering some penalty against the breaching party?
  8. May a judge order a rescission of a contract or some financial penalty for a violation of a law like the Truth in Lending Act or Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act or Home Owner'e Equity Protection Act by a lender?
  9. What kind of fraud, torts, legal errors, or other violations would constitute justification for a judgment against a lender in favor of a mortgagee?
  10. What kind of damages may n injured party demand for fraud or other intentional injury in a contractual relationship?
  11. What remedies would lie for an innocent borrower whom a lender/broker/appraiser/realtor fraudulently induced to buy and mortgage real estate?

I guess the real question I want to ask of foreclosure and mortgage victims boils down to this:


  1. Would you rather serve as the Dog-Meat Victim of foreclosure, with the lender operating as the big dog?  Or...
  2. Would you prefer to operate as the Big Dog Suing the dog-meat lender for torts, breaches of contract, fraud, and other violations?
  3. What if you become the Dog, but discover you have a big leash on you that keeps you from going after the dog-meat?

So, go ahead and answer: 

  1. If you had a choice, which would you prefer to be the  Big Dog, or the Dog-Meat?
  2. Do you have a choice?

Call me if at the below number if you want to find out. 

You have my permission and encouragement to distribute this message far and wide to all mail lists and mortgage victims.


--
Bob Hurt
2460 Persian Drive #70
Clearwater, FL 33763-1925
(727) 669-5511
Visit My Home Page  ·  Email Me  ·  Visit My Blog
Learn to Litigate with Jurisdictionary (Buy Now)
Stay informed with Lawmen E-letter (Subscribe Free Now)

Phone App
reads tag

Monday, May 21, 2012

Do our laws follow our religions? Excise a Gerp Today

Excise a Gerp Today

Do our laws follow our religions? 

This morning I received a call from a man in a different corner of our nation regarding the issue of police abuse.  He insisted that I tell him the answer to "what's your jurisdiction," according to the primary and secondary definitions in Black's Law Dictionary.  Black's 8th starts definint the term on page 2490 and goes on for pages, providing this first:

1. A government's general power to exercise authority over all persons and things within its territory; esp., a state's power to create interests that will be recognized under common-law principles as valid in other states <New Jersey's jurisdiction>. [Cases: States 1. C.J.S. States §§ 2, 16.] 2. A court's power to decide a case or issue a decree < the constitutional grant of federal-question jurisdiction>. — Also termed (in sense 2) competent jurisdiction; (in both senses) coram judice.
Pretty soon, I found out that the caller wanted to hammer me into submission with the assertion that the bible is the source of the law and jurisdiction comes from God. 

I told him that law comes from man's observation of relationships which culminated in the Golden Rule, and has nothing in particular to do with God or the bible.  I said the authors of the Bible lived under laws on that basis long before anyone wrote a bible.    I did not get to venture further because the line suddenly disconnected.

Anyway, he seemed to want to know MY authority for demanding that Police treat me with love and respect under my normal condition of abiding by the law.  I did not get to tell him that jurisdiction applies only to Government, and cops have only the authority to interfere with people under provisions of the law. I wanted to point him to the state constitution's guarantee of our right to privacy and to be let alone from intrusion of government into our lives except as specified in that constitution... and that explains why certain police behavior constitutes "abuse."

I wanted to explain that the people need to read the criminal laws regarding stop-and-frisk, and probable cause to arrest law breakers, and police powers to prevent crimes. And while abiding by the criminal laws, people should always demand identification and recitation of authority from cops, and sue and file internal affairs and criminal complaints against cops who violate their rights by exceeding that authority.

I suppose John Wolfgram could give him some lectures on that point, having suffered government thuggery and won in court against them.

How to Prevent and Eliminate Abuse by Government perpetrators of Crime ("Gerps")


But eventually, regardless of the source of abuse, whether from cops or criminals, people need to embrace a gradient scale of actions calculated to prevent and terminate abuse by government thugs.  Unless of course, they like to feel and deal with bruises, cuts, broken limbs, bashed heads, black eyes, life-long disabilities, and death at the hands of government thugs.

1.  Avoidance - keep out of harm's way.

  • Don't smart off to or antagonize law enforcers
  • Stay away from organized arrays of law enforcers
  • ALWAYS have one or more "wing men" (and least one surreptitiously) nearby observing and recording
  • Try to have several supporters in your company as witnesses, intimidating by mere peaceful presence

2.  Physical force  on-scene

  • get a concealed carry or other gun permit and bear arms for defense of self and others.

3.  Personal process - polite interaction with the abuser
  • talk to the abuser in calmer circumstances
  • coax, suggest retirement, offer a different job, explain the upshot of accelerating the issue, etc,

4.  Administrative process
  • write demand letters to legislators, mayors, police chiefs, news papers,and the abuser's family/friends/employers
  • hire investigators and PR agencies to dig up and expose dirt on the perp to the news media

5.  Legal process

  • file internal affairs / administrative,  criminal, and tort complaints, and prosecuting herding to resolution

6.  Political process

  • campaign for and elect politicians who will eliminate the abuse from within government

7.  Public process

  • rally, demonstrate, and march in parks, streets, public malls, etc., with signs, banners, flyers, etc.
8.  Retribution through removal, not punishment
  • Excise the perp and any enablers/supporters from government or (if necessary) from the planet by any means deemed expedient.
  • Use stealth to make detection and counter-retribution least likely.
  • Exercise caution to avoid mistakes, for the process constitutes grave personal danger.

Cops - Only Human

We should realize that police work endangers the cop, and the cop's family.  Dealing with sneaky, violent criminals imposes stress on cops that creates a fight or flight reaction tendency (PTSD), partly because the law constrains them not to kill the criminal on the spot except in certain circumstances.  That makes it dangerous for ordinary non-criminals to come into the cop's immediate presence. 

Add to that danger the fact that many cops use drugs and have become criminals themselves by accepting bribes, stealing the contraband and loot of both criminals and the innocent, and committing rape, mayhem, robbery, murder, and a host of other crimes.  They generally operate under an omerta-style code of silence in a good old boys network that protects the cops from exposure, arrest, and prosecution.  Even "good" cops have fallen into that network and turn a blind eye to their fellow officers' bad behavior, so they have become part of the problem and citizens simply cannot trust them to do the right thing to rein in the abuses by bad cops.  And, criminal cops have little compunction about hurting innocent people.  They tend to see everyone as just another kind of criminal.

Our Duty and Its Source

All of us have the duty to eliminate evil, criminal, abusive people from government.  I call them Gerps, Governemt pERPetratorS of crime.  Sometimes we find it too onerous and burdensome to make the effort because so many Gerps exist and hurt others.  We ought to feel compunction against such lethargy and dereliction of duty, but more than that, we ought to work together at home and in communities to excise crimes and Gerps from government, even if our favorite cops and politicians commit those crimes.

At the same time, we should patiently exercise some restraint, realizing that people in and out of government might err in good conscience.

We should never feel disdain for those seeking to expose and excise crimes and Gerps from government.  We should lend such justice seekers and their efforts our support, help fund their efforts, and join in to do the work as needed, as we prosecute our other ambitions in life.

You can ask whether the Bible or your religion endorses the above scheme of terminating abuse by cops and others in government, and excising the abusers from government.  The bible says "an eye for an eye," justifying vengeance.  It also says "love your neighbor as yourself," justifying tolerance.  Jesus elevated those notions by saying "love one another as I have loved you" and "forgive others seventy times seven."  And of course, the Golden Rule, a component of all religions, provides "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."  So, clearly, justice-seeking has its practical, moral, and ethical limits, ending short of hurting others except in a just cause.  Seeking justice becomes a balancing act.

Well, nothing I have written above violates the most enlightened of those principles.  If you love your fellows, you will not permit government thugs and rogues to abuse them.  You will not abuse them, except in the interest of prevention and justice, and you will not permit their abusing you.

If you have registered to vote, served in the US military or any other government job, or become a naturalized citizen, you have sworn an oath to support the US and state constitutions.  Those documents impose limits on government and police power.  The swearing of an oath has a religious nature, even if you don't add "so help me God" at the end. 

Thus, you have both a legal and religious duty to enforce the imposition of those limits on the authority of government employees.  You MUST, as both a good citizen and a child of God, eliminate crime and criminals from government by whatever means you deem expedient.  So,


EXCISE A GERP TODAY.

 

Reference - READ THESE


Florida Constitution of 1838 Article I:

We the People of the Territory of Florida ... in order to secure to ourselves and our posterity the enjoyment of all the rights of life, liberty, and property, and the pursuit of happiness, do mutually agree, each with the other, to form ourselves into a Free and Independent State, by the name of the State of Florida.

ARTICLE I.  Declaration of Rights.

That the great and essential principles of liberty and free government may be recognized and established, we declare:

Section 1.    That all freemen, when they form a social compact, are equal; and have certain inherent and indefeasible rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty; of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property and reputation; and of pursuing their own happiness.


Section 2.    That all political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and established for their benefit; and, therefore, they have, at all times, an inalienable and indefeasible right to alter or abolish their form of government, in such manner as they may deem expedient.


Section 21.    That the free ... of this State shall have the right to keep and to bear arms, for their common defense.



Declaration of Independence of 1776, Paragraph 2:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.



--
Bob Hurt
2460 Persian Drive #70, Clearwater, FL 33763-1925
(727) 669-5511   http://bobhurt.com

Friday, May 18, 2012

A Reason to Revise the 13th Amendment

I welcome discussion of the questions and issues raised below, but please keep hateful or insulting rejoinders to yourself.


A Reason to Revise the 13th Amendment

Copyright © by Bob Hurt 18 May 2012. All rights reserved



Pesky Questions About Bozos

Does a society have the right to enact laws that effectively prevent members of the society from

  • becoming a financial burden on the rest of society?

  • endangering others in society?

  • infecting innocent babies with a condition of lifelong obtuseness, brutishness, torpidity, and lack of intelligence?

How and why has the USA changed in average intelligence since its beginning?

Does any right of a society or civilization justify limiting the lower boundary of intelligence for parenting, such as through eugenics programs?

This commentary addresses those questions and might provide insights for the sincere truth-seeker.

Law and Likelihood of Harming Others

Consider the legislative enactments regulating business practices, highway traffic, and human relations. Take for example seatbelt laws. Government requires people to buckle themselves in because:

  • People often cause car crashes through negligence, incompetence, judgment error, or equipment failure;

  • The violence of car crashes often maim or kill people in and out of the car;

  • Such terrible loss causes families to suffer from reduced of earning power and enjoyment of life, and becoming a burden on society;

Thus, modern civilizations prohibit human actions likely to endanger selves. others, and society.

Qualities and Uses of Intelligence in Civilization

According to Wikipedia's IQ article, IQ has high heritability, intgelligence highly correlates to SAT scores, and people with IQ of 70 to 90 will likely engage in criminal behavior. Lynn and Vanhanen's books on IQ show the high correlation of national average IQ to gross national product. Therefore, means exist for society to determine the intelligence (g factor) and IQ of its members, and their corresponding value to society in terms of productivity, academic achievement, likely crimnality, burden on society, and the likelihood of low-intelligence parents procreating low-intelligence children.

One must have an IQ of at least 85 to graduate from high school. US IQ distributions from actual tests reveal that at least 75 million of its people have IQ below 85 and even more cannot graduate from high school because of behavior and health problems associated with low intelligence.

In the past 150 years the US has moved away from circumstances requiring massive numbers of low-intelligence people in its military and work forces. The military leaders of today desperately want recruits to have high school diplomas, and many manual labor jobs have moved to 3rd world countries as mechanization has modernized farms and factories. America needs people who can think, arrive at correct evaluations, and make correct decisions.

Hypocrisy of Ignoring the Gene Pool

Wouldn’t it make sense to reduce the need for protective laws, prisons, and welfare infrastructures legislating to elevate the quality of the gene pool?

I see the refusal to take such action as rank hypocrisy:

  • We demand laws regulating seatbelt usage, road, motor vehicle, and building construction, highway speed, driver licenses, professions like plumbing, dentistry, medicine, and lawyering, and many other areas of life, on the basis of likelihood of resultant injury. But,

  • We ignore the far higher likelihood of injury resulting from procreation by people of low intelligence.

How much sense does that make?

Hypocrisy aside, does it not seem unintelligent to refuse to discuss the reasons and means for reducing the percentage of grossly unintelligent people in future populations? Does it not seem even more stupid to refuse out of political correctness - the notion of feeling embarrassed that the topic might offend those of grossly low intelligence?

How about taking a poll of the stupid and ask them whether they enjoy feeling confused, frustrated, victimized, in trouble, and unable to learn, to figure things out, or to make prudent decisions? We might discover that they think they figure things out just fine, or that they hate the condition and would become smart if they could.

Well, aside from that, it could go without saying that the highly intelligent would find some tasks boring that the lowly intelligent would find gratifying. Likewise, tasks that would challenge and gratify the intelligent would frustrate and anger the unintelligent.

Many jobs exist that would suit the unintelligent. Thus, society's needs for the unintelligent still exist, such as domestic servitude, and simple tasks for which employers cannot afford machines. But such tasks have an economic value nonetheless, and it makes no economic sense to force an employer to pay more than the value of them.

Intelligence Strata (Classes) in America

The existence of 75 million relatively unintelligent people in America and the lack of available jobs for such people poses a serious problem that has resulted in America's prisons bursting at the seams.

America has entered an age where it handles unintelligent people as follows:

  • Puts them into the welfare system (they burden taxpayers); and

  • Suffers crimes at their hands (they burden their victims and then the criminal justice system).

Meanwhile, the very smart have advertised the American Dream's cornucopia of goods and services which the unwealthy obtain through debt. The unwealthy, unlike the unintelligent, do have intelligence, but either don't use it sufficiently to become wealthy, or actually don't have quite enough intelligence to become wealthy. That is, wealth does not generally happen by accident except when inherited by someone who very likely has high intelligence, the offspring of someone intelligent enough to garner wealth.

So we have three major strata:

  • The highly intelligent wealthy (high class)

  • The somewhat intelligent or lazy unwealthy (middle class)

  • The unintelligent poor (low class)

In practice:

  • The high class has managed to make the middle class into voluntary servants through glitzy ads and debt.

  • Many of the high and middle class employ the low class for domestic servants.

  • Some, but not that many, of the middle and high classes provide the low class with food, clothing, and shelter as part of the domestic servitude arrangement.

  • The existence of many if not most of the low class have made the high and middle classes into their involuntary servants through crime, and taxation that pays for welfare abuse, health care, social workers, failed education efforts, and prisons.

  • Even though taxes on the high class do pay for the upkeep of the low class, the high class never notices it as a burden because of other tax benefits and shelters, but those taxes impose a severe burden on the middle class.

The 13th Amendment and Reverse Slavery

This makes it apparent that the 13th Amendment did not actually abolish involuntary servitude. In reality, it appears that Americans, through their misguided sense of fairness, justice, and altruism, have destroyed the effectiveness of community charity programs for the feckless, handing those to government, and converted the middle class into slaves of the low class AND the high class.

The upshot of this weird dilemma: Americans have upset the Law of the Survival of the Fittest with a system of legislated slavery of the middle class to the high class through usurious debt and to the low class through taxation. Victims of this system can only imagine that the high class engineered it intentionally. It does seem pretty slick when one ponders it. And that explanation clarifies the reason Government refuses to patrol the borders or impose some kind of check on the presently unrestrained procreation of children by unintelligent parents.

This dilemma and its causes constitute a wholly immoral, unethical perversion of civilization's ideals. A society ought to engineer civilization for evolution toward some age of light and life, so to speak, where no crime, poverty, or war exists, and people can prosecute their ambitions without unduly burdening their fellows. That can never happen in an increasingly mechanized society in which 25% of the people haven't the cognitive ability to graduate from high school, and will certainly resort largely to crime or welfare abuse to get by.

People of low intelligence make sense in a free society so long as others don't become systematic slaves to them. The unintelligent must have a means of becoming gainfully, self-sufficiently, and happily employed, or the wards of those willing to care for and obtain economic benefits from them. The unintelligent simply cannot become and remain wards of the state without an economic justification. Liberty, after all, comes at the expense of commensurate responsibility.

Reverse Slavery Justifies 13th Amendment Revision

The foregoing discussion sheds new light on the 13th Amendment. That Amendment should stand, but ONLY for people with sufficient IQ and ambition to operate self-sufficiently. So, Congress ought to modify it a bit to that end.

Though many might feel loathe to admit it, involuntary servitude gave many benefits to many people, in spite of members of master and slave classes abusing one another.

Potential Benefits of 13th Amendment Revision

It provided sustenance, employment, and regulation for the servants and labor and other economic and personal benefits for the masters. Both sides benefited and to a large extent enjoyed the arrangement. And most of the servants, though slaves, escaped far worse conditions in their homelands.

But, involuntary servitude had serious deficiencies:

  • Incorrigible and violent slaves endangered the master and other slaves, and belonged in prison, not in a family or commercial enterprise.

  • Abusive or negligent masters hurt or deprived their slaves.

  • Many people became slaves who had the intelligence and raw ability become good, self-sufficient citizens, and should not have become involuntary servants.

Today we have a reverse-slavery system where the high and middle classes, who can care for themselves and become good citizens, have become involuntary servants to the low class who cannot care for themselves or become good citizens.

Society must reverse this situation while dramatically reducing the low class to a size that society actually needs for a smoothly functioning economy. That constitutes the supreme reason to outlaw production of bozos in America. Within 3 generations the averate intelligence of the nation will rise significantly, welfare will diminish so that neighborhoods can handle it without government interference, crime will drop dramatically, inner city ghettos will disappear, prison industries will shrink, and America will become monumentally more productive, more competitive than ever in the world economy.

And, Americans with good sense should demand a change to the 13th Amendment to impose a system of involuntary servitude on able-bodied people who, by their nature, cannot or will not care for themselves without hurting or burdening others.

Americans of good sense will otherwise remain slaves to the unintelligent of the land. And that just doesn't make much sense, does it?



# # #



--
Bob Hurt
2460 Persian Drive #70, Clearwater, FL 33763-1925
(727) 669-5511   http://bobhurt.com

Wednesday, May 16, 2012

Oh Yeah Sourdough


1847 Oregon Trail Sourdough Starter I granulated 10 years ago and kept in a jar in the fridge. 
Took some out, fed it flour and water for a couple of days, got this frothy, bubbling spongy mess.





Mixed it in with a cup of oatmeal and 50/50 white bread flour with whole wheat flour.
Included a big heaping tablespoon of salt, some olive oil, and sugar. 

Formula:  200g sponge, 20g salt, 650g R/O water, 1000g flour
Got this big blob of dough going.  No kneading.  Just got all the ingredients wet.



Stretched and folded it every 45 minutes, 3 times.
Cut the blob into loaves and let it rise in bread pans for 3 hours.




Snipped a groove in the tops of the loaves with scissors.
Put those loaves in a cold oven and baked them 45 minutes at 375.
Fresh out of the oven, Piping hot at 199 degrees F.  Smelled up the whole house.
Lawdy Momma!  OH  Yeah!  Sourdough!


--
Bob Hurt
2460 Persian Drive #70, Clearwater, FL 33763-1925
(727) 669-5511   http://bobhurt.com