Showing posts with label foreclosure. Show all posts
Showing posts with label foreclosure. Show all posts

Saturday, July 19, 2014

How to Win $16 Million in the Loan Mod Lottery

You Can Win Colossal Damage Awards in a Jury Trial by Proving the Lender Injured you at the Inception of the Loan

by Bob Hurt, 19 July 2014.  Distribute Freely

The Linza v PHH case shows the good sense of MORTGAGE ATTACK (http://mortgageattack.com) as a methodology for dealing with foreclosure.  It shows how to win $16 million if the mortgagee cheats you in the loan modification process.

In a nutshell, mortgage company PHH agreed to a loan modification to reduce Phillip Linza's payments about $500, then jacked the payments higher than before, then demanded over $7000, and then refused to accept payments, and THEN foreclosed. Linza hired a lawyer, sued, and after 3-years of legal combat the jury awarded $16 million to Linza because of egregious lender behavior including credit rating damage.
If a lender/servicer has jilted YOU in a loan mod,  you might see something familiar in this scenario.  If so, you should do what Linza did:  SUE.
This does not exactly constitute a Loan Mod Lottery, but it might as well because so few mortgagors sue the lender for cheating them in the loan mod.  You can easily see why.  In a lottery you pay a dollar for a ticket and have a slim chance of winning.  In a loan mod lawsuit, you must find an attorney willing to take the case on contingency, or have enough money to pay for a 3-year litigation, but you have a HUGE chance of winning IF your lawyer has sufficient skill and perseverance.

I see a major problems with Loan Modifications.  To begin with the interest rate goes sky high in 5 years and you have a balloon you can never pay off.  Most loan mod agreements require the borrower to agree to an indemnity clause which waives the right to sue for prior injuries in the loan.  I see THAT as INSANE because lenders and their agents have injured 90% of all single family home mortgagors in the past 12 to 15 years.  

Yuba jury awards homeowner $16 million in mortgage case
Published: Friday, Jul. 18, 2014 - 2:43 pm
It started out as a simple loan modification for a troubled homeowner. It turned into a $16.2 million jury verdict against a nationwide loan-servicing company.
A Yuba Superior Court jury this week awarded $16.2 million in damages to a homeowner who nearly lost his home to foreclosure after the loan servicer botched his mortgage modification, the homeowner’s lawyers said Friday.
Phillip Linza, a homeowner in Plumas Lake, was awarded the damages after a three-year battle against PHH Mortgage Services, a loan servicer based in Mount Laurel, N.J.
Linza’s attorneys, Andre Chernay and Jon Oldenburg of the United Law Center in Roseville, said the award included $514,000 in compensatory damages and $15.7 million in punitive damages.
... 

Call The Bee’s Dale Kasler, (916) 321-1066. Follow him on Twitter @dakasler.

If you need help unraveling the weirdness of your mortgage and loan mod, and finding the causes of action underlying either, visit http://mortgageattack.com to learn the basics, and then call me for a discussion.  I don't practice law or give legal advice, but you might appreciate my business perspectives.
-
-->
Bob Hurt            Blog 1 2 3   f  t 
2460 Persian Drive #70
Clearwater, FL 33763
Email Call: (727) 669-5511
Law Studies: Donate   E-Letter Subscribe
Learn to Litigate with Jurisdictionary



Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Adverse Possession Nosedives in Florida, with Good Reason

Last April a news article revealed that Polk County, Florida had 800 adverse possessions (APs) of realty registered with the property appraiser there.  Florida Statute 95.16 and 95.18 acknowledge adverse possession as a right or remedy by explaining the minimum requirements for doing it.  Essentially, an Adverse Possessor (APer) must register the AP within a year with the property appraiser, and must take notorious and hostile possession of, pay the taxes for, and cultivate or improve the property for seven years, after which time the owner loses the right to interfere with possession.  The APer MUST notify the owners, holders of both equitable and legal title.  That means the APer has to notify the trustee and possibly all of the certificate holders under a Pooling and Servicing Agreement, a daunting prospect.

The statutes do not say how to do all of this without the sheriff arresting the APer for grand theft, fraud, swindle, breaking and entering, burglary, criminal mischief, and the like.  Traditional AP deals with property boundary issues like building a shed partially on a neighbor's back yard.  Most APers these days take AP of realty abandoned in foreclosure.  The rightful owner, seeing the foreclosure as inevitable, abandons the realty altogether, never intending to return.  I call such people "abandoneers."

The fact:  sheriff deputies in Palm Beach, Polk, Hillsborough, Sarasota, Pasco, and Marion counties have arrested numerous APers for one or more of the above crimes.  As I have reported before, that seems a bit like a white sheriff arresting an African-American driving a Rolls Royce for a faulty U-turn when in reality, the sheriff resents an African-American who drives a car many times finer than the sheriff's own car.  In other words, the sheriff arrested the African-American for "driving while black" but called it "faulty U-turn" so other officials would not see his racial prejudice clearly.

In reality, sheriffs have the obligation to protect owners' property rights, particularly the right of possession, against trespass by interlopers such as APers. So the comparison to arrests for driving while black doesn't seem quite fair.

How the Government Harasses the Adverse Possessor of Foreclosure-Abandoned Realty

Typically, sheriff deputies will do the following:
  1. Obtain the AP registration from the property appraiser
  2. Visit the realty to meet and interview the occupant. 
  3. Tell occupant, if not the APer, that the APer has no right to charge rent, doesn't own it,a nd the occupant does not have to pay the APer at all.
  4. Visit and interview the abandoneer
  5. Tell the abandoneer that the occupant can cause all kinds of damage for which the abandoneer will stand responsible
  6. Ask the abandoneer to sign a trespass warning
  7. Serve the warning or the occupant and order the occupant to move
  8. Arrest the APer for one of the above crimes
In some counties, sheriffs seem more tolerant and lenient.  They might, for example, simply tell the APer to move but not arrest the APer.

In others they and the prosecutor apply such relentless pressure as to drive the APer to a plea bargain or suicide. 

  • In Palm Beach County in early December 2010, APer Mark Guerette accepted a felony conviction in order to get probation.  That conviction will affect him adversely for life.  
  • In Sarasota County, official persecution drove APer Joel McNair to suicide on 29 May 2011 after releasing him from 2 arrest warrants for grand theft on $120,000 bond.  That might affect him into eternity.  
  • Two weeks ago APer George Williams left Hillsborough County Jail on $40,000 bond after 3 months' incarceration on 12 charges (including grand theft and scheme to defraud) related to AP of 9 properties, 5 of which Williams had improved but into which he had not put a tenant.  
  • The sheriff in Sumter County forced an APer woman out of an AP house after she had spent $3500 fixing it up.  Today a judge in the Circuit Court denied her motion to intervene in the foreclosure case related to the AP realty.  A small claims court dismissed her complaint against the owner for the $3500 for "failure to state a cause of action for which relief can be granted."  You see, she did not have a contract with the owner for improving the property.

Clearly, AP poses a serious impediment to the prosperity and liberty of APers of abandoneer realty.

Questions to Ask the Court about Adverse Possession

I have speculated that APers, before they AP, should file declaratory judgment actions in the local Circuit to determine their rights related to adverse possession.  The court should answer such questions as:
  1. Doesn't the existent of AP laws presume I have the right to take adverse possession without interference from government?
  2. Didn't we all inherit from England the right to take AP of abandoned realty?
  3. Does the sheriff have the constitutional authority to arrest me for AP and call it grand theft, etc, or does that arrest violate my constitutional rights?
  4. Doesn't the sheriff violate my rights to privacy by stirring up the abandoneer against me for AP of the abandoneer's realty?
  5. Doesn't abandonment of realty give anyone the right to take possession of it, finders keepers, like possessing a mink coat thrown in a public dumpster?
  6. Does abandonment of foreclosure realty give the mortgage holder the owner's equitable title?
  7. If the above right exists, doesn't that undercut the 7 year statute of limitations for AP?
All these questions might seem sensible, but for one little troublesome fact: 

  • The constitutions of the US and all the states consider the owner's right to possession of the owned realty inviolate by the public.


Many Ways to Lose Ownership of Realty

Well, truthfully, owners can lose their "owned" realty for a variety of reasons, such as
  • foreclosure of a mortgage loan or other contract in which the realty served as collateral;
  • bankruptcy;
  • non-payment of property or other taxes;
  • eminent domain (taking by government);
  • adverse possession;
  • probate court for those who die intestate;
  • Conquest and seizure by a foreign or domestic power (remember William the Bastard's conquest of England in 1066?).

Thus, if you can grab it and keep it with physical force, it belongs to you.  But in all those situations, ONLY due process empowers a lawful and peaceful transfer of realty. 

And so, the constitutions and laws favor the owner of record.  If an APer complies with all the rules and the owner does not protest, the APer gets to keep the realty.  But in spite of compliance, if the  owner of record protests prior to the expiration of the statute of limitation, the government has the duty to assist the owner in removing the interloper from the realty. 

Why It Makes No Sense to Take Adverse Possession of Realty Abandoned in Foreclosure

In foreclosure, the lender or assignee, having legal title to the subject realty, cares enough about the realty to foreclose the loan and force a foreclosure sale of the realty to pay the loan balance.  Such realty does not favorably compare to a stretch of ignored arrable land on some huge country estate that a family might occupy and cultivate because the owner simply does not care.  In foreclosure, the lender really does care, and MUST get the realty sold to cover the note.  So it makes little sense to take adverse possession of it because the APer won't get to stay there long.

Joel McNair depended on that fact for his enterprise to work.  If the owner complained, he simply got his crew to move his "member" occupant of the AP realty to another AP realty.  He had upward of 100 houses in AP, just as Mark Guerette had.  But the sheriff deputies arrested McNair repeatedly and the State Attorney seemed determined to prosecute him.  So in the end, the scheme made no sense.

Furthermore, as I have conjectured, the court might deem that abandonment in foreclosure doesn't put the realty up for grabs, but rather devolves equitable title to the mortgagee. 

Thus, AP of realty abandoned in foreclosure constitutes a transparent tactic to possess the property only until the foreclosure goes through and the court issues a writ of possession to eject the APer or APer's renter.  That makes it a bad tactic, particularly given the likelihood that a sheriff deputy will force the APer or renter out anyway under trespass law.

A Bad Idea

SO, AP of realty abandoned in foreclosure puts both the APer and the APer's renter in harm's way.  Either the equity owner or legal owner will get the sheriff or court to eject the occupant and possibly arrest the occupant and/or the APer.  Either or both could face felony charges and a long jail term.   For that reason I discourage taking adverse possession of realty abandoned in foreclosure.  Messing with someone else's property constitutes a really bad idea...

...unless you have a really big army to back you up.



Bob Hurt, Concerned Bob Hurt        My Blog
2460 Persian Drive #70
Clearwater, FL 33763
Email; Call: (727) 669-5511
Law Studies: Donate   Subscribe
Learn to Litigate with Jurisdictionary


Saturday, June 25, 2011

Foreclosure: Pretend-Defender Delays Cheat Clients

Only Serious Torts Timely Challenged Justify Undoing the Mortgage Loan

For months I have patiently and repeatedly explained that ONLY exposure of tortious conduct underlying the mortgage loan will defeat foreclosure permanently while allowing the foreclosure victim to walk away with the house and some pocket money.

Pretend-Defenders Only Delay the Inevitable and Cheat the Client

Meanwhile, "pretend-defender' law firms charge an up-front fee of $1000 to $5000, then charge $500 to $1000 monthly to stave off foreclosure for as long as possible.  In the end, the forecloser succeeds and the victim loses the house.  Thus, the pretend-defenders cheat their clients out of victory.

How?

How to Delay Foreclosure without an Attorney

Simple.  Foreclosure victims (home "owners") don't need a lawyer to stave off or delay foreclosure. 

Loan Mod Process Stops Foreclosure

They stop the foreclosure by asking the lender for a loan modification.  This delays for several months, during which time the owner can save money or pay off other debts.

In my opinion it makes no sense to accept a loan mod.  Typically the realty has collapsed in value, but the loan mod leaves the loan balance the same.  Furthermore, most restructure the loan to a 30 or 40 year term with a huge balloon payment in 5, 10, or 15 years.  Only an idiot would borrow more money than the value of the house, and stay in the same old house.

So, the owner can ask for a loan mod, string the process out as long as possible

Walk with Deed in Lieu

Then the owner should ask the lender for a deed-in-lieu-of-foreclosure.  Typically, the lender will accept such an offer and give $5,000 to $10,000 move-out money.  A smart owner can pocket that money, add to it from savings, and buy a new house at a foreclosure auction.  At many auctions one can purchase a foreclosed house in decent condition for 10% to 15% of the loan balance.

Many Owners Should Move Anyway

In many, if not most cases, it makes sense to move anyway.  Most families have out-grown or in-grown the present house and need either more or less space for the family.  Most current houses need maintenance work costing $20,000 or more.  Because most houses have an actual value 40% to 60% of the loan balance, it makes no sense to continue paying for it.  Strategically, it makes more sense to toss the place.

Effect of "Not Paid As Agreed" on FICO Score

Remember that a "not paid as agreed" loan mod, deed in lieu of foreclosure, or short sale drops the FICO credit rating score only 100 points, relatively easy to correct within 2 or 3 years if the borrower does not default on other credit obligations .   On the other hand, a foreclosure (the ultimate goal of most pretend-defender lawyers) stays on the credit report for 7 years and lowers the FICO score for at least 2 or 3 years. 

How to Get Help with Short Sale

Note that even a short sale makes more sense than a foreclosure.  If the note holder refuses to approve the short sale, contact the mortgage insurance agent and explain the situation.   If the foreclosure proceeded to auction, the mortgage insurer would certainly lose much more money than in a short sale because auctions bring a smaller sale price. The agent will probably remind the holder that witting failure to mitigate the insurer's loss constitutes a federal crime because it cheats the FDIC out of money.  And the holder will then approve the short sale.

Litigation Delays Sanctionable

Remember also that any delay in making payments which delay the pretend-defender can and should prevent amounts to sanctionable legal malpractice.   Suppose the pretend-defender delays a year wrongly.  Who owes all the interest and penalties, court cost, and lawyer fees accrued during that time?  The borrower, of course.  Unless the borrower complains to the court, the pretend-defender will not have to pay it.  So, when the foreclosure happens, the clerk will deduct the deficient amount from the proceeds of the foreclosure auction, and that will come right out of the borrower's pocket.  These days that means the borrower will owe a judgment lien because most foreclosure sales don't produce enough revenue to satisfy the note and discharge the loan.  Thus, the delay really cheats the foreclosure defendant.

What the Pretend-Defender SHOULD Do

Pretend-Defenders should actually defend against the foreclosure by trying to undo the loan for fraud.  You see,  almost everything that delays a foreclosure, such as complaining about robo signing, bad notarizations, bad or missing assignments of beneficial interest in the note, note separated from mortgage, securitization fraud, and so on, does NOT CHANGE THE FACTS:

Undisputable Facts

1.       The borrower signed the note promising to pay according to schedule
2.       The borrower signed the mortgage transferring legal title in the realty to the lender and agreeing to give up the house in foreclosure for defaulting on loan payments
3.       The lender loaned the money
4.       The borrower bought the house with it
5.       The borrower took possession of the house and benefitted from it
6.       The borrower failed to make payments according to schedule.

Many who furtively seek escape from foreclosure try to test the law or find loopholes to no avail with arguments like these:

Frivolous Arguments Doomed to Fail


  1. I didn't have a loan at the time I signed the note
  2. I didn't have seizen of the estate at the time I signed the mortgage or deed of trust
  3. Only I, the maker of the note, own the note
  4. I didn't get a chance to read, understand, and change bad provisions of the note and mortgage
  5. I didn't have an actual contract with the lender
  6. Real money doesn't exist except in US minted gold and silver coins
  7. The use of Federal Reserve Notes in the transaction cheated me and violated Article I Section 10 of the US Constitution
  8. The note got separated from the mortgage
  9. My note got put into the security after the REMIC cutoff date
  10. My note got indorsed in blank


The undisputable facts enumerated above justify the foreclosure, REGARDLESS of all the other arguments like those enumerated above…

…UNLESS the borrower got injured by tortious conduct related to the purchase or mortgage loan. 

WHAT tortious conduct? 

Typical Tortious Conduct

·         Over-appraisal that caused the borrower to pay too much for the realty.  
·         Change in family income on the loan application by the mortgage broker.
·         Excessive broker fees or other loan origination costs.
·         Egregious misrepresentation about the realty itself which the buyer could not detect.

…. to name just a few.

Unfortunately, pretend-defenders don't have the skill, patience, time, or will to accomplish such discoveries.  They have so many clients whom they have conned into delaying the foreclosure that they just cannot devote the time to such discoveries.  So they forego them in favor of cheating their clients into buying their service which the clients could accomplish themselves by other means.

Settle or Sue

If the defender (now not a pretender) actually discovered such fraud, the foreclosure victim (or any other mortgagor so cheated) would have grounds for a massive winnable tort lawsuit against the lender, lender's agents (appraiser, mortgage broker), title company, seller, and/or seller's agents (Realtors).  The defender could then approach those defendants for a settlement offer.  Most times, the culprits would cave in rather than face the possibility of punitive damages.  In this instance, the plaintiff might walk away with the house free and clear, the lawyer paid off, and some pocket money left over for anguish suffered.

Or, the defender and plaintiff could sue anyway and win treble damages, court costs, lawyer fees and punitive damages of God-knows-how-much.

THAT would NOT constitute cheating the client, would it?

Note that documentation proving tortious conduct like that above could by itself force a settlement.  For that reason many attorneys would willingly prosecute the tort claim on contingency, so the litigation would not cost the client anything out of pocket, except perhaps for the cost of finding the tortious conduct.

What the Foreclosure Victim Should Do

Clients of pretend-defenders should

1.       Dump the pretend-defender lawyer,
2.       Hire an expert to find the torts, then
3.       Hire a personal injury attorney to settle with or sue the foreclosure plaintiffs or other parties. 

TO accomplish step 2 above the foreclosure victim should gather up $1500 and a copy of the following documents, then call the below phone number to FIND THE FRAUD UNDERLYING THE MORTGAGE LOAN.

1.       Appraisal,
2.       Loan Application,
3.       Purchase Agreement,
4.       All the papers signed at closing, particularly including the
a.       Note,
b.      Mortgage,
c.       HUD1 settlement report

Email the Mortgage Attack Maven
Call THIS NUMBER and ask for Mortgage Attack
727-669-5511

The Ombudsman there will give you confidence about the benefit of the comprehensive professional mortgage examination service and tell you where to send the documents and fee.  Then the examiner will find the tortious conduct, contract breaches, and legal errors, if any, document them thoroughly in a report, and send you the report within 7 business days.

Why Foreclosure Victims Should Go to Mortgage Attack and NOT to Some Loser Loan Audit Service

Most operators of loan audit and securitization audit services are former or current mortgage brokers or effete attorneys who will scam you by running computer software brokers or lenders use to prepare mortgages.  They enter your details and compare them with your HUD1 report or look for TILA and RESPA  violations which do you no good.  You see, such violations for most people will net them only a thousand or so dollars, not undo the whole transaction.  Such scammers DON'T find the contract breaches and other tortious conduct underlying the transaction.  They simply take your money and give you a useless report that will make you MORE of a FORECLOSURE VICTIM.  The report will typically do NOTHING to undo the mortgage or realty purchase.

Mortgage Attack's service can find and will find any evidence of torts, breaches, and legal errors underlying the mortgage, and, for added cost, draft the tort complaint for the foreclosure victim's attorney, crafted for the victim's state of location of the realty in foreclosure.  Thus, Mortgage Attack arranges services few if any competitors can or will do.

One More Point – for Home Owners with Mortgages NOT in Foreclosure

If you bought your home more than two years ago, and you make your payments just fine, you might still justify undoing the loan and purchase because of fraud at its base.  Appraisal fraud operated like a rampant rot for decades in America.  Realtors and home sellers would conspire to jack up the price of realty way beyond the actual combined value (replacement cost, income capitalization, market value), and the government and finance industry made it worse by encouraging people who couldn’t repay to get loans.  Appraisers gladly gave the home industry the prices they wanted for fat, juicy loans loaded with commissions and profits for brokers, lenders, and home sellers.  They nearly always cheated the buyer in the process,

Furthermore, anyone having purchased a home in the past ten years might now owe more for the property than its actual value today because of the collapse of realty values as a consequence of the financial crisis.  You might want a way to unload the house.  Many people (I included) believe that the realty values only collapsed because the industry had falsely inflated them for decades, and as of this writing they have not yet collapsed to their true value.  Thus, the industry has cheated most home buyers for decades.

So, for you, it could make sense to look for the fraud in your home purchase and mortgage, and then approach the lender for a settlement, or mount a tort lawsuit against the lender and the lender’s agents for the fraud.

Mortgage Attack's service can and will find any such relevant tortious conduct underlying your purchase and mortgage. 

Give Mortgage Attack just 10% of your trust. 

You will receive a 100% result within 7 business days.

Incidentally,  if you cannot find an attorney who “gets it” about the above principles, ask Mortgage Attack for a recommendation.  They might know the perfect attorney to help you WIN instead of delay.



Summary and Conclusion

I see a lot of internet ads for lawyers who only delay the inevitable foreclosure and gouge their clients for services the clients can do themselves.  Foreclosure victims can thus save money to use in buying a house at auction and prevent terrible damage to their credit scores, without a lawyer's help, then move to a more suitable home.

On the other hand, Foreclosure victims and other mortgagors can find the fraud underlying the mortgage transaction and use it as the basis for a settlement request or tort lawsuit against the foreclosure plaintiffs.  Many personal injury attorney will take the case on contingency upon seeing hard evidence of the fraud.

I know of only one service that can reliably and quickly find the tortious conduct and prepare a report with the affirmative defenses or elements of the cause of action within 7 business days:  Mortgage Attack.  So I heartily recommend the service.  Get your money and mortgage docs together and call Mortgage Attack during East Cost business hours ASAP.

727 669 5511,  http://mortgageattack.com

Oh, by the way:  Mortgage Attack does not operate under contract to any company or individual.  The mortgage examination service IS THAT GOOD, and constitutes a TREMENDOUS VALUE you won’t find elsewhere.



Bob Hurt, Concerned Bob Hurt        My Blog
2460 Persian Drive #70
Clearwater, FL 33763
Email; Call: (727) 669-5511
Law Studies: Donate   Subscribe
Learn to Litigate with Jurisdictionary

Tuesday, March 08, 2011

Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Report

Bob Hurt - Scorn for Govt Fraud
An Ectograph of Biz-Gov Fraud, Greed, Racketeering


The United States Government finally figured out what caused the present financial crisis that skyrocketed unemployment to 15% or more, and jammed realty prices down close to their real values, 30% to 60% of their phony 2008 levels.  The government issued its Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission report and posted it on the web.This report explains the financial crisis in gory detail.  


In a nutshell:


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - Conspiratorial collaboration between government and the banking, mortgage, and insurance industries resulted in unprecedented sale of realty to unqualified buyers, and unauthorized use of notes in commerce known as securitization, coupled with fraudulent derivative sales and widespread appraisal fraud pillaged investors.  Crooked rocket docket courts compounded the problem in judicial foreclosure states by letting crooked lenders, trusts, and servicers steal realty and throw owners into homelessness.


Now you have the bottom line.  But don't take my word for it. Download and read the report here:


Get and Use the FCIC Report in Court


http://www.fcic.gov/

The above site constitutes SELF AUTHENTICATING EVIDENCE, so you can cite probativeexcerpts of it in your foreclosure fraud, appraisal fraud, or mortgage fraud court case.

You can get a screen capture program here for your browser:

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=browser+screen+capture

You can use it to capture pages of the report for use in pleadings.

The report summarizes the crisis as follows:



Salient Paragraphs of FCIC Report Summary

------------ FCIC summary of crisis, starting page xvi ---------------

In this report, we detail the events of the crisis. But a simple summary, as we see it, is useful at the outset. While the vulnerabilities that created the potential for crisis were years in the making, it was the collapse of the housing bubble—fueled by low interest rates, easy and available credit, scant regulation, and toxic mortgages— that was the spark that ignited a string of events, which led to a full-blown crisis in the fall of 2008. Trillions of dollars in risky mortgages had become embedded throughout the financial system, as mortgage-related securities were packaged, repackaged, and sold to investors around the world. When the bubble burst, hundreds of billions of dollars in losses in mortgages and mortgage-related securities shook markets as well as financial institutions that had significant exposures to those mortgages and had borrowed heavily against them. This happened not just in the United States but around the world. The losses were magnified by derivatives such as synthetic securities.

The crisis reached seismic proportions in September 2008 with the failure of Lehman Brothers and the impending collapse of the insurance giant American International Group (AIG). Panic fanned by a lack of transparency of the balance sheets of major financial institutions, coupled with a tangle of interconnections among institutions perceived to be “too big to fail,” caused the credit markets to seize up. Trading ground to a halt. The stock market plummeted. The economy plunged into a deep recession.

The financial system we examined bears little resemblance to that of our parents’ generation. The changes in the past three decades alone have been remarkable. The  financial markets have become increasingly globalized. Technology has transformed the efficiency, speed, and complexity of financial instruments and transactions. There is broader access to and lower costs of financing than ever before. And the financial sector itself has become a much more dominant force in our economy.

From 1978 to 2007, the amount of debt held by the financial sector soared from $3 trillion to $36 trillion, more than doubling as a share of gross domestic product. The very nature of many Wall Street firms changed—from relatively staid private partnerships to publicly traded corporations taking greater and more diverse kinds of risks. By 2005, the 10 largest U.S. commercial banks held 55% of the industry’s assets, more than double the level held in 1990. On the eve of the crisis in 2006, financial sector profits constituted 27% of all corporate profits in the United States, up from 15% in 1980. Understanding this transformation has been critical to the Commission’s analysis.

Now to our major findings and conclusions, which are based on the facts contained
in this report: they are offered with the hope that lessons may be learned to
help avoid future catastrophe.


-------------------------- End of Summary from FCIC ------------


Much more text accompanies these conclusions in the report.  READ it



Summary of FCIC Report Conclusions

----------------------- Summary of FCIC Conclusions ------------------

  • We conclude this financial crisis was avoidable.
  • We conclude widespread failures in financial regulation and supervision proved devastating to the stability of the nation’s financial markets.
  • We conclude dramatic failures of corporate governance and risk management at many systemically important financial institutions were a key cause of this crisis.
  • We conclude a combination of excessive borrowing, risky investments, and lack of transparency put the financial system on a collision course with crisis.
  • We conclude the government was ill prepared for the crisis, and its inconsistent response added to the uncertainty and panic in the financial markets.
  • We conclude there was a systemic breakdown in accountability and ethics.
  • We conclude collapsing mortgage-lending standards and the mortgage securitization pipeline lit and spread the flame of contagion and crisis.
  • We conclude over-the-counter derivatives contributed significantly to this crisis.
  • We conclude the failures of credit rating agencies were essential cogs in the wheel of financial destruction.
--------------------End of summary of FCIC Conclusions

Bob Hurt's Opinion of the Mess


In my opinion, Presidents George W Bush and Bill Clinton bear serious responsibility for the crisis because of their idiotic ideas of making sure every adult in America who wanted a house could buy a house.  Next in line, the lender banks intentionally sold mortgage loans to unqualified borrowers.  Then, the Federal Reserve and member banks further encouraged the insanity by refusing to control lenders.  Then lenders involved themselves in wrongful securitizations and derivative sales that AIG and others insurers, including the FDIC underwrote.  These and fraudulent appraisals caused the collapse of real estate prices.


However, the report gives scant if any attention to the reality of 30 years of rampant appraisal fraud in which Realtors, mortgage brokers, lenders, appraisers, and some homeowners FLAT OUT LIED about realty values.  Typically, appraisers ignored replacement cost and income capitalization valuation methods, and focused on market value to determine the worth of realty.  And the Federal Reserve repeatedly jockeyed interest rates so that with every reduction, people rushed to buy a bigger house because they could now afford it.  Speculation drove prices higher to the delight of middle class investors.  As a result, inflated prices when the crisis hit stood as much as 3 times higher than the actual value of the realty, particularly in New York and California where the prices got totally insane.


The report did not reveal anything most studious people did not already know.  But it did provide the concrete GOVERNMENT PROOF of the collusion and racketeering at various levels that collapsed realty values and threw people out of work and out of their homes. Serve MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE to courts of this report. Preach its implications of racketeering to all who will listen, particularly legislators and judges.. The time has come to DEMAND that the courts provide meaningful relief and remedy, not for the crooked lenders, but for their hapless victims.


Demanding Relief for Victims and Penalty for Perps

Courts should cram down every possible mortgage loan to the present real estate value minus all paid-in equity, reschedule it for 30 years with no baloon and 1% over inflation rate.  They should require written contracts signed by both the lender and the borrower, and invalidate the unilateral adhesion agreements without such bilateral contracts.  Courts must stop foreclosures dead in their tracks.  Everyone up the investment chain above the end consumer must suffer the burden of equity loss.

Every legislator, executive, and judge who supported the factors that caused the crisis should permanently leave government without pension.  Legislators must mandate a screaming end to sovereign immunity, particularly judicial immunity. Only heads on a pike will prevent such insanity in the future.


Further, Bob sayeth naught...

till later.



------------
Bob Hurt
2460 Persian Drive #70
Clearwater, FL 33763
727 669 5511
Donate to my Law Scholarship fund
Subscribe to Lawmen E-Letter
Learn to Litigate with Jurisdictionary