Friday, March 09, 2012

You ABC guys are such idiots

Regarding the Sovereign Citizen story by Dan Lieberman and Dan Harris of ABC NEWS here:

 

http://abcnews.go.com/US/sovereign-citizens-radicals-exercising-god-rights-fueling-domestic/story?id=15876417#.T1n_qDHy8uA

 

 

You implied that the story would not be a hatchet job. It’s a mirror of the cbs story, Dan, a hatchet job.

 

Either you lied to me our your handlers lied to you.  Even Diane Sawyer did a better job with the footage than you and Harris.

 

Regarding your centerpiece, a rerun of the cbs video on jerry kane, DO YOUR HOMEWORK:

 

·         http://www.infowars.com/arkansas-cop-murders-frame-up-of-the-patriot-movement/

·         http://privateaudio.homestead.com/Jerry-and-Joe-Kane-Memorial.html

·         http://justiceforjerryandjoekane.com/Home.php

 

These show that the cops doctored the video.

 

As I told you and said at that meeting, I have worked to dispel the patriot myths of hotheads like William Crowley.  You lumped me in with them and ignored everything I said.  You tried to make us all look like radicals.  You showed James Gray complaining about the handcuffs with no context, and Francis Knize with no context.

 

What planet are you from?  You came down trying to prove we are  a bunch of radicals, but never once hinted that OUR group wants to hold Government accountable for the crimes and malfeasance of its employees.

 

I feel SO disappointed in you and Harris and ABC.  You people are idiots who did not fairly represent the story.  I see you as operatives for the ADL and SPLC.  You are such idiots.

 

 

Bob Hurt

 

Contact: Email  bh   f       t • 
Blogs: 
1 2 3 • 
Law: 
E-letter Subscribe Donate Learn
2460 Persian Drive #70,  Clearwater,  Florida 33763  •  
727 669 5511

 

 

***

 

 

Thursday, March 08, 2012

What does "Sovereign Citizen" mean?

What does "Sovereign Citizen" mean?

OPEN LETTER TO ABC NEWS PRODUCER DAN LIEBERMAN and ANCHOR DAN HARRIS

By Bob Hurt http://bobhurt.com, Email

Some self-appointed gurus claim the term “sovereign citizen” constitutes an oxymoron (Conjoining contradictory terms).  Actually, it does not. 

“Citizen” means “a member of a political community.”  The term “sovereign citizen” means "A citizen from whom government sovereignty flows."

The term implies that the sovereign citizen yields a degree of his sovereignty to government in order to idealize the balance of liberty with responsibility.  So it means “I am responsibile for proper use of my sovereignty which I have yielded to government, and I can and shall take it back from government employees who abuse it.”

Ralph W. wrote

“A citizen is a man or woman that has granted a limited delegation of power by and though posited in an organic constitution and to access that constitution and bill of rights he/she is a "citizen of Florida" and not a sovereign citizen”.

I responded

“I have written the precise meaning.  Take it or leave it.  The implication of the term “sovereign citizen” boils down to TAKING RESPONSIBILITY for abuses of government, not merely operating like one of the sheep citizens submitting to government abuse.  It also implies intelligent, informed courage and not merely a "damn the torpedoes, FULL SPEED AHEAD" mentality.  In the typical implicit meaning, a citizen functions like a subject who may or may not express voice in government, but a Sovereign Citizen expresses that voice through the political process including the polls and any other action needed to make government employees comply with their loyalty oaths and respect the limits on government authority.  A HUGE difference exists between the sheep citizen and the sovereign citizen.”

Government employees must adhere to the strict limits of the constitutions, AND they must enforce the constitutions’ guarantee of the expressed and unexpressed rights of the people.  If they don’t , then they do not obey their oaths to “support the constitution.”  And if they violate those oaths, they become or should become “dog meat” and the citizenry ought to

1.   Stop the abuse, then

2.   Remove the abuser from government by any expedient means.

Our nation’s and state’s founders said it best:

·         In the Declaration of Independence of 4 July 1776, paragraph 2:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

 ·         and in the Florida Constitution of 1838 Article I Section 2:

 “That all political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and established for their benefit; and, therefore, they have, at all times, an inalienable and indefeasible right to alter or abolish their form of government, in such manner as they may deem expedient. 

 See our discussion trail below.

 Naturally, discussions like this lead us to the question “What if those in government disagree with your method and take up arms against you?” 

 We see that government disagreement every day in the streets of America, some legitimate and some not.

·         Many people commit crimes and the police/sheriffs/FBI, etc., arrest them. 

·         But many become victims of arrest, beatings, and incarceration simply for exercising their rights. 

·         Many litigants become victims of prosecutorial abuse or judicial abuse, and suffer terrible, lasting damage as a consequence. 

·         Legislatures and Congress have enacted many unconstitutional laws. 

·         Executive branch agents have engaged in public policy pogroms to abuse whole classes of people.  Prior to 1960 many states deprived Black people of their voting rights through abusive poll taxes. 

·         Today, Americans tolerate all kinds of balloting abuse so that their votes don’t count, don’t matter, and have no effect on elections.

What happens?  Well, criminals get punished who deserve it.  And many innocents get abused because they did not effectively stand up for their rights or excise the crime and criminals from government before it became so entrenched and widespread as to resist any excision effort.

That means all the victims of abuse could take lessons from the millions whom the abusers never singled out for abuse.  It also means that those who avoided the abuse ought to “live their religion” and help their fellows.  It takes political and legal activism by a lot of intelligent, informed people to stop the abuse by rogues in government.

Guess what?  It is what it is.  Abuse exists regardless of who should prevent it or why it happens.  And you either hunker down and suffer it like a citizen, or you stand up and do something to stop it like a sovereign citizen.

It’s just a choice.  One carries little personal risk, and the other exposes one to monumental personal risk.

The news media will try to paint as criminals those who stand up and do something effective to stop abuse and crimes by government employees.  I encourage people to stand up and take effective administrative, legal, and political action, and to develop the tools and physical power to make their voices heard and heeded by government employees, so as to excise the abuse and the abuser from government.  THAT kind of person is a “sovereign citizen.”

Bob Hurt

Contact: Email  bh   f       t • 
Blogs: 
1 2 3 • 
Law: 
E-letter Subscribe Donate Learn
2460 Persian Drive #70,  Clearwater,  Florida 33763  •  
727 669 5511

 

 

[2:18:09 PM] Bob Hurt: Look at this OpEdNews array of videos of Bob Hurt and Tampa Bay area people promoting honesty in government.

 http://www.opednews.com/Diary/ABC-News-and-FBI-considers-by-Steven-G-Erickson-120205-813.html

 See the ABC World News with Diane Sawyer and ABC News Nightline tonight (Thursday, 8 March 2012) about Sovereign Citizens.  You might see me in their video.  Then you compare what you see on ABC with the videos at the above link.  You can determine for yourself whether ABC presented the story accurately.

 [2:25:38 PM] Ralph Kermit Winterrowd 2nd: Really busy right now but "sovereign citizen" is a oximoron combination of words.  Will check later.

 [3:57:52 PM] Bob Hurt: Actually, it is not an oxymoron.  It means "A citizen from whom sovereignty flows." It implies that the citizen yields a degree of his sovereignty to government in order to idealize the balance of liberty with responsibility.  So it means I am responsibility for proper use of my sovereignty which I have yielded to government, and I can take it back from government employees who abuse it.

 [3:59:49 PM] Ralph Kermit Winterrowd 2nd:  A citizen is a man or woman that has granted a limited delegation of power by and though posited in an organic constitution and to access that constitution and bill of rights he/she is a "citizen of Florida" and not a sovereign citizen.

 [4:11:43 PM | Edited 4:11:59 PM] Bob Hurt: Ralph, I have written the precise meaning.  Take it or leave it.  The implication of the term sovereign citizen boils down to TAKING RESPONSIBILITY for aubses of government, not merely operating like one of the sheep submitting to government abuse.  It also implies intelligent, informed courage and not merely a "damn the torpedoes, FULL SPEED AHEAD" mentality.  In the typical implicit meaning, a citizen is a subject who may or may not express voice in govenrment, but a Sovereign Citizen expresses that voice through the political process including the polls and any other action needed to make government employees comply with their loyalty oaths.  A HUGE difference exists between the sheep citizen and the sovereign citizen.

 [4:15:06 PM] Ralph Kermit Winterrowd 2nd: I reject ipse dixit pontifications - so there we are.  Proceed as you want as I find no definitions in support of "sovereign citizen"

 [4:17:06 PM] Bob Hurt: You propound such pontifications when you blithely assert sovereign citizen is an oxymoron.

 [4:18:25 PM] Bob Hurt: It is a term of art to distinguish the activist citizen who holds government accountble, even to the point of using physical force if necessary, from one of the sheep citizens who barely even votes.

 [4:20:29 PM] Ralph Kermit Winterrowd 2nd: There citizens of Florida, citizens of the several States, citizens of the United States of America and American citizens. - all good and have a meaning.  There are citizens of the United States that want the same rights as white citizens, etc. as defined in 42 USC §§§ 1981, 1982, 1988 and 14 Stat. 27 and R.S. 1878 Title XXIV.

[4:50:38 PM] Bob Hurt: You have written the facts, Ralph.  But tonight ABC will do segments on Sovereign Citizens, so get with the program and understand the language.  They want to make Sovereign Citizens look like wackos, and some probably are, but I am not, and I don't consider myself part of a rebellious group, even though I fully endorse "Whoever's closest to the snake, grab a stick and hit it."  THAT's what "sovereign citizen" is all about.  Unfortunately, yoiu can always whack the wrong snake, not all have fangs, etc.

[4:52:02 PM] Bob Hurt: And there's the danger.  We need judges to sort out the bullshitter snake oil salesmen from the honest businessman.  We cannot do their job without all the facts.  There's the danger for sovereign citizens.  Government will target and exterminate them after the press does its job of making them look like idiots.  That's why I try to become the voice of reason to them.  LOOK AT THE VIDEOS, and SEE THE SHOW TONIGHT.

 

Wednesday, March 07, 2012

How does the Florida foreclosure acceleration bill affect adverse possessors?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/florida-lawmakers-consider-accelerating-foreclosures/2012/03/05/gIQAU3JatR_story.html

 

 

Let’s suppose this law passes.  It won’t change the fact that plaintiffs MUST have all their documents in order and properly prove their claims and have standing etc. 

 

Most foreclosure defenses simply don’t exist. Why?  Because defendants ALL KNOW they signed the note, owe the money, signed the mortgage, and must give up the house.  So they don’t put up much of a fight.  And those who do nearly ALWAYS lose the house.

 

If the bill becomes law, banks will have a motive to get all their paperwork in order so they can have an accelerated foreclosure, AS THEY SHOULD.

 

It also means that mortgagees will have a green light to take over houses abandoned in foreclosure.  That also should mean adverse possessors could compete against the lender banks IF they do it the right way.

 

The bank has no right to possess the property till the court orders the foreclosure sale.  Will the proposed law change that?  How could it?  Wouldn’t that impair the obligations of the mortgage contract?

 

Answer this:

 

If the mortgage requires the owner to forfeit all rents to the lender to cover the mortgage payment, shouldn’t the lender have the right to sue the adverse possessor of the house abandoned in foreclosure for damages equivalent to reasonable rents?

 

Show me some reasoning and case law to support your answer.

 

 

This mess keeps driving home one of my favorite mantras regarding mortgages – FIND THE FRAUD, TORTS, BREACHES, and other VIOLATIONS UNDERLYING THE MORTGAGE, and demand a cash settlement or sue.  This applies to ALL mortgages, not just the ones in foreclosure.  The vast majority of them have appraisal fraud or other serious malfeasznce underlying them.  With proof of such malfeasance, the mortgagor could work the lender through a personal injury attorney for settlement or lawsuit to get a cash settlement, loan balance reduction, the house free and clear, and possibly punitive damages.

 

why do so many mortgage malfeasance victims, knowing this, pin their hopes on futile efforts to use litigation to delay the inevitable foreclosure?

 

 

 

***

 

Bob Hurt

 

Contact: Email  bh   f       t • 
Blogs: 
1 2 3 • 
Law: 
E-letter Subscribe Donate Learn
2460 Persian Drive #70,  Clearwater,  Florida 33763  •  
727 669 5511

 

 

***

 

Monday, February 13, 2012

Benefits of Adverse Possession - Sample Letter to Owner of Realty Abandoned in Foreclosure 20120213

I have attached and appended below the text for a proposed letter to the owner of record of a home for which you have just filed a notice of adverse possession.  I wrote this one for Florida.  You can adapt it to your state.

My buddy Storm sent me this excerpt from a treatise on Adverse Possession:

ACTUAL, OPEN AND NOTORIOUS POSSESSION The trespasser must actually be in possession of the property and treat it as if he were an owner. This means there must be a physical presence on the land. It's not enough for someone just to make a claim, orally or in writing, of ownership. The words "open and notorious" simply mean that it must be obvious to anyone, including an owner who investigates, that a trespasser is on the land. Actual (physical) possession is usually open and notorious. Someone out in the field harvesting crops is obvious, as is a person pruning the rose garden that she planted on a strip of the neighbor's back yard. Similarly, a neighbor who just put a fence up slightly on the next-door property is obvious. So is the one who just poured a concrete driveway two feet over the boundary line. The point of this requirement is to let the owner know someone is occupying the land, so something can be done about it. An owner who allows someone to trespass for years without giving permission, complaining or taking action, the theory goes, loses the rights to the land.

 

Storm insists that an adverse possessor is a trespasser, and I disagree.  He knows a lot more about the law than I do, but I still disagree. I maintain that if the owner does not post a "Get off" notice or tell you to get off the land, or tell the sheriff/police to move you off the land, you are not a trespasser.  I maintain that only the equitable owner, lessee, agent, or (with written warning from the owner, lessee, or agent) law enforcers have the right to move an adverse possessor off the land.

Storm has told me that the adverse possessor must tell the owner about the adverse possession.  I disagree.  I believe openly taking adverse possession will be "obvious to … an owner who investigates" and if the owner does not investigate and does not hire someone as agent to remove trespassers in his absence, the owner has thereby waived notice.  Don't listen to me, though.  I'm not a lawyer (see notice at bottom).

My point here is that you can't even trust people knowledgeable in the law on points like this because they have NEVER LITIGATED A MATTER LIKE THIS and can only guess what the courts will say. That explains why I encourage would-be adverse possessors to find a lawyer and sue the various state officials for declaratory judgments to declare the rights of the adverse possessor and enjoin government officials to leave them alone unless the owner initiates a request without government tampering to remove the adverse possessor from the owner's realty.

 

 

I do concede, however, that the equitable owner, of record, whom I shall just call "owner" can become an adverse possessor's MOST POWERFUL ALLY when the owner has abandoned the realty in foreclosure.  Such owners usually feel frightened, worn out from moving, intimidated ty the foreclosure process, and fed up.  Such "abandoneers" usually hate that house and wish it would burn down so the lender wil only get scorched earth with a bucketful of ashes. 

Some, in spite of knowing that they ought to protect the land from vandals, termites, mold, etc,,  can't afford it and have lost all hope and motivation to care for the place. They have truly abandoned it with no thought of returning to it to care for it or occupy it.

The adverse possessor can put the owner's mind at ease by sending the below (and attached) letter.  It explains many of the benefits of adverse possession to everyone from owner to state government.  NOBODY LOSES, provided the adverse possessor behaves like a decent human being and responsible owner of real estate.

 

A similar letter to the sheriff or chief of police might have a beneficial effect.  They might actually start encouraging adverse possession instead of looking for reasons to arrest them.

 

I suggest a campaign of sending generic flyers to all of the state's legislators, judges, newspapers, radio stations, TV stations, and prosecutors, particularly those in the adverse possessors's county of interest.

For that reason, I encourage adverse possessors to seek one another out, meet and mingle, share experiences in meetings every week, 2 weeks, or month, and work together to inform the press, law enforcers and relevant  government officials, and attorneys about the benefits of AP.  Most lawyers need a re-education on the subject.

Tell your friends, family, associates, and church members about THIS adverse possession mailing list, and encourage them to join by sending email to

 

If you received this message from a source other than the adverse possession law advocacy group, click here to subscribe to the group:

Adversepossession+subscribe@googlegroups.com

Or scan this QR code with your Smart Phone and use it to subscribe.

Use one of these applications on your smart phone to scan the above QR code.

·         http://tag.microsoft.com,

·         http://qrdroid.com/

·         http://www.appbrain.com/app/barcode-scanner/com.google.zxing.client.android

 

 

 

Benefits of Adverse Possession –

Proposed Letter to Owner of Realty Abandoned in Foreclosure (20120213)

 

Date:         whenever

From:        Adverse Possessor
address

To:            Alleged Rightful Owner of Adversely Possessed Realty
address

Subject:     Adverse Possession of Residential Real Property (hereinafter "Realty") at address


Dear Alleged Rightful Owner of the Subject Realty:

Background.  I have attached a copy of my notice of adverse possession of the Realty. I filed the notice with the County Property Appraiser today.  I provide the copy to you as a courtesy formally to alert you of my intention to take adverse possession of your property at the above address because you abandoned it, possibly in response to the foreclosure the bank filed against you.

Purpose.  I intend to help you by protecting your property.  I write to you now to explain to you the adverse possession's financial benefits for you, your real property, your immediate neighbors, the neighborhood, the town, the County, law enforcers, the home owner association (if any),  and the people  and State of Florida.

What is Adverse Possession?  It is a means of someone taking and holding continuous, open (public), beneficial, possession of realty, paying taxes, government assessments, and any home owner association dues, demarking its boundaries with an enclosure if necessary, and maintaining and improving it, for a certain period of time, all without permission of the owner of record (in this case, you).  During this time, the owner of record can regain the realty by simply asking the adverse possessor to abandon it.

Overview of Benefits.  Many people consider it bold, audacious, and disrespectful to take adverse possession of real property.  They don't realize the ultimate good that always comes of it.  I want to explain that good to you.  Many benefits accrue to the above entities from adverse possession:

  1. Loving Care. A family who lives in the Realty dwelling treats it like their home, caring for it as they would their own in the hope that someday it will become theirs permanently.
  2. Mold and Mildew. Adverse possessors typically keep the air conditioning system running summer and winter.  This prevents dangerous buildup of mold and mildew that excessive humidity would cause if the A/C didn't operate for extended time.  As you know, mold constitutes a serious danger to health.
  3. Pestilence. Adverse possessors typically keep the dwelling free of termites, roaches, bedbugs, spiders, centipedes, rodents and other vermin that constitute a health hazard to humans and that actually damage the dwelling, often necessitating costly repairs.
  4. Druggies. Adverse possessors prevent drug dealers, marijuana grower, cocaine/crack/crystal meth addicts and other ne'er-do-wells from partying in and damaging the dwelling from neglect.
  5. Thieves.  An unoccupied house often falls prey to thieves who steal appliances, plumbing fixtures, doors, window coverings, copper wiring and plumbing, and flooring.  It costs the owner a small fortune to replace these and put the house in condition suitable for selling it.  Adverse possessors prevent thieves from stealing those things.
  6. Vandals.  Vandals and street thugs often see an unoccupied dwelling as a target of opportunity;  they break windows, destroy carpets, urinate or defecate on the floors, break holes in walls, destroy the roof, turn on the water and let water from stopped up sinks flood the floor, jam metal and other objects down into the plumbing, break toilet and sink porcelain, and so on.  Cleanup and repair can cost the owner a small fortune. Adverse possessors keep such damage from happening by increasing the vandals' risk of capture.
  7. Freezes and Hurricanes. Adverse possessors typically mind the effect of the weather on plumbing and windows.  They install protective coverings to prevent violent storms from breaking windows.  They wrap water pipes or let outside faucets drip during freezes to keep them from bursting.  An unoccupied house gets no such respectful care, and related repairs can become costly.
  8. Maintenance.  Residential realty always need routine maintenance such as lawn-mowing, hedge-trimming, edging, filling in of holes dug by dogs and other creatures, painting, landscaping, fixing broken windows, and so on..An occupant will typically do all this work, but the owner must pay to have others do it if no occupant lives there.
  9. HOA Dues.  Adverse possessors must pay Home Owner Association (HOA) dues.  The owner must pay them if no adverse possessor lives there.
  10. Taxes.  Adverse possessors must pay property taxes.  The owner must pay them if no adverse possessor lives there.
  11. Property Management.  Managing all the above constitutes a significant enterprise of work and attention to duty for the adverse possessor.  The associated management fees would similarly tax the rightful owner.  The adverse possessor saves the rightful owner from having to pay that cost.
  12. Property Values.  Because of the above realities, vacant residential realty invites wanton damage and undesirable lurkers, makes the neighborhood look deserted and unattractive, and reduces the curb appeal of the community.  Therefore, people will not want to live there.  That will diminish property values in the community in general.
  13. 7-Year Savings.  Adverse possessors can pay taxes, homeowner dues, repair and maintenance costs for up to 7 years, and the rightful owner can, just before the statute of limitations expires, have the sheriff remove the adverse possessors removed for trespass.  Thus, adverse possession might not pose a risk of any kind to the rightful owner who doesn't sleep on his rights beyond 7 years.
  14. Restored Realty Prices.  The adverse possessors can end up leaving the Realty AFTER property values have returned to their normally ridiculously high values because more people have jobs and the ability to buy them.
  15. Litigation Risk.  It costs an enormous amount of money to litigate against people with respect to questions of Realty ownership and title.  Adverse possessors save the rightful owner much of that cost because they admit that they don't have ownership rights until after seven years.  On the other hand, an adverse possessor with profound knowledge of mortgages, lending practices, securitization, and the recent Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Report's details about abuse of authority and duty in both government and the lending and securities industries could make for truly messy litigation assisting the prior owner of record in challenging REAL titular interest in the Realty.  It could easily cost $100,000 or more in legal fees, and put the alleged rightful owner (and other parties joined to the action) at risk of disgorgement and treble damages, and possibly exorbitant punitive damagesin favor of the prior owner of record.
  16. Everybody Wins.  Adverse possessors keep the property in good shape, pay taxes and HOA dues, keep the community safer than otherwise, and help to increase property values.  I imagine that rightful owners of common sense will see adverse possessors as a boon, not a bane, to the rightful owner, to the adverse possessor's family, to the municipality, to the neighborhood, to the courts, and to law enforcers.

 
Check the Numbers.  If you have your accountant pull up your maintenance and cost records on residential Real Estate Owned for your review, you will find that adverse possessors can save you an enormous amount of money without putting you at risk losing the property permanently or having to spend substantially on ownership costs.

Permission: NO.  I do not ask your permission to possess the property.  In fact, I specifically deny having your permission.  I have ADVERSE possession of the Realty. 

Trespass.  At the same time, this letter should have helped you see the wisdom of  forbearance in accusing me of trespass.  I hope that you will communicate directly with me by telephone or mail if you intend to accuse me of trespass.  I believe we can settle the matter amiably and without law enforcement if you give me reasonable notice. 30 days' notice should suffice.  To reciprocate your kindness, I shall timely notify you of my intention to abandon the Realty. 30 days' notice should suffice. I shall provide you with an accounting on my expenses and costs associated with the adverse possession.

Adverse Possession - A Fine American Tradition Inherited from Britain.  Many people consider adverse possession a "something for nothing" scheme, scam, and con.    Some consider it grand theft and fraud.  Such thinking constitutes a delusion as you have seen from the foregoing presentation.  Adverse Possession actually protects property and puts it to the highest and best use for everyone concerned. 

Jurists have recognized this for centuries and the related facts show why the Florida Legislature enshrined adverse possession in Florida Statutes 95.12 through 95.18.  It ensures that the property receives reasonably good care, that it enjoys improvement, that the County receives related property taxes, and that the rightful owner has a HUGE window of opportunity to excise the adverse possessor from the land.  So it provides society with benefits such as I have explained above.  You get someone to look after your property and save you a ton of money, and it does not cost you a penny for 7 years. 

True, you could have fixed up the property and rented it out.  But you didn't.  You abandoned it to God-knows-what-fate.  The Legislature tends to favor adverse possession for putting realty to its highest and best use.  Therefore the Legislature has enacted the adverse possession laws to refine the statutory and common law of Britain that formed the basis of Florida's original state laws.

No Response Necessary.  You do not need to respond to this letter, but I shall appreciate it if you do. 

Memorandum of Law.  I have attached a memorandum of law for your reference.



Sincerely yours,

(Signature)

Intended Adverse Possessor


 

Memorandum of Law - Some Florida Laws Related to Adverse Possession

Florida Statutes as of 13 Feb 2012

95.12 Real property actions.—No action to recover real property or its possession shall be maintained unless the person seeking recovery or the person's ancestor, predecessor, or grantor was seized or possessed of the property within 7 years before the commencement of the action.

History.—s. 2, ch. 1869, 1872; RS 1287; GS 1718; RGS 2932; CGL 4652; s. 8, ch. 74-382; s. 521, ch. 95-147.

95.13 Real property actions; possession by legal owner presumed.—In every action to recover real property or its possession, the person establishing legal title to the property shall be presumed to have been possessed of it within the time prescribed by law. The occupation of the property by any other person shall be in subordination to the legal title unless the property was possessed adversely to the legal title for 7 years before the commencement of the action.

History.—s. 4, ch. 1869, 1872; RS 1289; GS 1720; RGS 2934; CGL 4654; s. 9, ch. 74-382.

95.14 Real property actions; limitation upon action founded upon title.—No cause of action or defense to an action founded on the title to real property, or to rents or service from it, shall be maintained unless:

(1) The person prosecuting the action or making the defense, or under whose title the action is prosecuted or the defense is made, or the ancestor, predecessor, or grantor of the person, was seized or possessed of the real property within 7 years before commencement of the action; or

(2) Title to the real property was derived from the United States or the state within 7 years before commencement of the action. The time under this subsection shall not begin to run until the conveyance of the title from the state or the United States.

History.—s. 3, ch. 1869, 1872; RS 1288; GS 1719; RGS 2933; CGL 4653; s. 10, ch. 74-382.

95.16 Real property actions; adverse possession under color of title.

(1) When the occupant, or those under whom the occupant claims, entered into possession of real property under a claim of title exclusive of any other right, founding the claim on a written instrument as being a conveyance of the property, or on a decree or judgment, and has for 7 years been in continued possession of the property included in the instrument, decree, or judgment, the property is held adversely. If the property is divided into lots, the possession of one lot shall not be deemed a possession of any other lot of the same tract. Adverse possession commencing after December 31, 1945, shall not be deemed adverse possession under color of title until the instrument upon which the claim of title is founded is recorded in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of the county where the property is located.

(2) For the purpose of this section, property is deemed possessed in any of the following cases:

(a) When it has been usually cultivated or improved.

(b) When it has been protected by a substantial enclosure. All land protected by the enclosure must be included within the description of the property in the written instrument, judgment, or decree. If only a portion of the land protected by the enclosure is included within the description of the property in the written instrument, judgment, or decree, only that portion is deemed possessed.

(c) When, although not enclosed, it has been used for the supply of fuel or fencing timber for husbandry or for the ordinary use of the occupant.

(d) When a known lot or single farm has been partly improved, the part that has not been cleared or enclosed according to the usual custom of the county is to be considered as occupied for the same length of time as the part improved or cultivated.

History.—s. 5, ch. 1869, 1872; RS 1290; GS 1721; RGS 2935; CGL 4655; s. 1, ch. 19253, 1939; s. 1, ch. 22897, 1945; ss. 11, 12, ch. 74-382; s. 1, ch. 77-174; s. 1, ch. 87-194; s. 522, ch. 95-147.

195.18 Real property actions; adverse possession without color of title.

(1) When the occupant has, or those under whom the occupant claims have, been in actual continued occupation of real property for 7 years under a claim of title exclusive of any other right, but not founded on a written instrument, judgment, or decree, the property actually occupied is held adversely if the person claiming adverse possession made a return, as required under subsection (3), of the property by proper legal description to the property appraiser of the county where it is located within 1 year after entering into possession and has subsequently paid, subject to s. 197.3335, all taxes and matured installments of special improvement liens levied against the property by the state, county, and municipality.

(2) For the purpose of this section, property is deemed to be possessed if the property has been:

(a) Protected by substantial enclosure;

(b) Cultivated or improved in a usual manner; or

(c) Occupied and maintained.

(3) A person claiming adverse possession under this section must make a return of the property by providing to the property appraiser a uniform return on a form provided by the Department of Revenue. The return must include all of the following:

(a) The name and address of the person claiming adverse possession.

(b) The date that the person claiming adverse possession entered into possession of the property.

(c) A full and complete legal description of the property that is subject to the adverse possession claim.

(d) A notarized attestation clause that states:

UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, I DECLARE THAT I HAVE READ THE FOREGOING RETURN AND THAT THE FACTS STATED IN IT ARE TRUE AND CORRECT.

(e) A description of the use of the property by the person claiming adverse possession.

(f) A receipt to be completed by the property appraiser.

The property appraiser shall refuse to accept a return if it does not comply with this subsection. The executive director of the Department of Revenue is authorized, and all conditions are deemed met, to adopt emergency rules under ss. 120.536(1) and 120.54(4) for the purpose of implementing this subsection. The emergency rules shall remain in effect for 6 months after adoption and may be renewed during the pendency of procedures to adopt rules addressing the subject of the emergency rules.

(4) Upon the submission of a return, the property appraiser shall:

(a) Send, via regular mail, a copy of the return to the owner of record of the property that is subject to the adverse possession claim, as identified by the property appraiser's records.

(b) Inform the owner of record that, under s. 197.3335, any tax payment made by the owner of record before April 1 following the year in which the tax is assessed will have priority over any tax payment made by an adverse possessor.

(c) Add a notation at the beginning of the first line of the legal description on the tax roll that an adverse possession claim has been submitted.

(d) Maintain the return in the property appraiser's records.

(5)(a) If a person makes a claim of adverse possession under this section against a portion of a parcel of property identified by a unique parcel identification number in the property appraiser's records:

1. The person claiming adverse possession shall include in the return submitted under subsection (3) a full and complete legal description of the property sufficient to enable the property appraiser to identify the portion of the property subject to the adverse possession claim.

2. The property appraiser may refuse to accept the return if the portion of the property subject to the claim cannot be identified by the legal description provided in the return, and the person claiming adverse possession must obtain a survey of the portion of the property subject to the claim in order to submit the return.

(b) Upon submission of the return, the property appraiser shall follow the procedures under subsection (4), and may not create a unique parcel identification number for the portion of property subject to the claim.

(c) The property appraiser shall assign a fair and just value to the portion of the property, as provided in s. 193.011, and provide this value to the tax collector to facilitate tax payment under s. 197.3335(3).

(6)(a) If a person makes a claim of adverse possession under this section against property to which the property appraiser has not assigned a parcel identification number:

1. The person claiming adverse possession must include in the return submitted under subsection (3) a full and complete legal description of the property which is sufficient to enable the property appraiser to identify the property subject to the adverse possession claim.

2. The property appraiser may refuse to accept a return if the property subject to the claim cannot be identified by the legal description provided in the return, and the person claiming adverse possession must obtain a survey of the property subject to the claim in order to submit the return.

(b) Upon submission of the return, the property appraiser shall:

1. Assign a parcel identification number to the property and assign a fair and just value to the property as provided in s. 193.011;

2. Add a notation at the beginning of the first line of the legal description on the tax roll that an adverse possession claim has been submitted; and

3. Maintain the return in the property appraiser's records.

(7) A property appraiser must remove the notation to the legal description on the tax roll that an adverse possession claim has been submitted and shall remove the return from the property appraiser's records if:

(a) The person claiming adverse possession notifies the property appraiser in writing that the adverse possession claim is withdrawn;

(b) The owner of record provides a certified copy of a court order, entered after the date the return was submitted to the property appraiser, establishing title in the owner of record;

(c) The property appraiser receives a certified copy of a recorded deed, filed after the date of the submission of the return, from the person claiming adverse possession to the owner of record transferring title of property along with a legal description describing the same property subject to the adverse possession claim; or

(d) The owner of record or the tax collector provides to the property appraiser a receipt demonstrating that the owner of record has paid the annual tax assessment for the property subject to the adverse possession claim during the period that the person is claiming adverse possession.

(8) The property appraiser shall include a clear and obvious notation in the legal description of the parcel information of any public searchable property database maintained by the property appraiser that an adverse possession return has been submitted to the property appraiser for a particular parcel.

History.—s. 7, ch. 1869, 1872; s. 6, ch. 4055, 1891; RS 1291; GS 1722; RGS 2936; CGL 4656; s. 1, ch. 19254, 1939; ss. 13, 14, ch. 74-382; s. 1, ch. 77-102; s. 523, ch. 95-147; s. 1, ch. 2011-107.

1Note.—Section 4, ch. 2011-107, provides that "[t]his act shall take effect July 1, 2011, and applies to adverse possession claims in which the return was submitted on or after that date, except for the procedural provisions governing the property appraiser's administration of adverse possession claims included in s. 95.18(4)(c) and (d) and (7), Florida Statutes, and the provisions governing the payment of taxes included in s. 197.3335, Florida Statutes, as created by this act, which apply to adverse possession claims for which the return was submitted before, on, or after that date."

95.191 Limitations when tax deed holder in possession.—When the holder of a tax deed goes into actual possession of the real property described in the tax deed, no action to recover possession of the property shall be maintained by a former owner or other adverse claimant unless the action commenced is begun within 4 years after the holder of the tax deed has gone into actual possession. When the real property is adversely possessed by any person, no action shall be brought by the tax deed holder unless the action is begun within 4 years from the date of the deed.

History.—s. 64, ch. 4322, 1895; GS 591; s. 61, ch. 5596, 1907; RGS 794; s. 2, ch. 12409, 1927; CGL 1020; ss. 1, 2, ch. 69-55; s. 1, ch. 72-268; s. 28, ch. 73-332; s. 1, ch. 77-174.

Note.—Former ss. 196.06, 197.725, 197.286.

95.192 Limitation upon acting against tax deeds.

(1) When a tax deed has been issued to any person under s. 197.552 for 4 years, no action shall be brought by the former owner of the property or any claimant under the former owner.

(2) When a tax deed is issued conveying or attempting to convey real property before a patent has been issued thereon by the United States, or before a conveyance by the state, and thereafter a patent by the United States or a conveyance by the state is issued to the person to whom the property was assessed or a claimant under him or her, and the tax deed grantee or a claimant under the tax deed grantee has paid the taxes for 4 successive years at any time after the issuance of the patent or conveyance, the patentee, or grantee, and any claimant under the patentee or grantee shall be presumed to have abandoned the property and any right, title, and interest in it. Upon such abandonment, the tax deed grantee and any claimant under the tax deed grantee is the legal owner of the property described by the tax deed.

(3) This statute applies whether the tax deed grantee or any claimant under the tax deed grantee has been in actual possession of the property described in the tax deed or not. If a tax deed has been issued to property in the actual possession of the legal owner and the legal owner or any claimant under him or her continues in actual possession 1 year after issuance of the tax deed and before an action to eject him or her is begun, subsections (1) and (2) shall not apply.

History.—s. 27, ch. 73-332; s. 201, ch. 85-342; s. 524, ch. 95-147.

95.21 Adverse possession against lands purchased at sales made by executors.—The title of any purchaser, or the purchaser's assigns, who has held possession for 3 years of any real or personal property purchased at a sale made by an executor, administrator, or guardian shall not be questioned because of any irregularity in the conveyance or any insufficiency or irregularity in the court proceedings authorizing the sale, whether jurisdictional or not, nor shall it be questioned because the sale is made without court approval or confirmation or under a will or codicil. The title shall not be questioned at any time by anyone who has received the money to which he or she was entitled from the sale. This section shall not bar an action for fraud or an action against the executor, administrator, or guardian for personal liability to any heir, distributee, or ward.

History.—s. 1, ch. 3134, 1879; RS 1293; GS 1724; RGS 2938; CGL 4658; s. 1, ch. 20954, 1941; s. 3, ch. 22897, 1945; s. 15, ch. 74-382; s. 1, ch. 77-174; s. 525, ch. 95-147.

 


 


 

 

***

WARNING:     I do NOT function as  law practitioner, lawyer, licensed attorney-at-law, or legal advisor.  Construe my comments ONLY as speculation or general information, and NOT as legal advice for you or anyone else.  Consult a well-qualified attorney (good luck finding one) in all questions of legality or law.

 

***

*****************************************************************
Bob Hurt
Home Page - +1 (727) 669-5511
2460 Persian Drive #70 - Clearwater, FL 33763
Donate to my Law Studies
Learn to litigate:  Buy and Study 
JURISDICTIONARY
Stay up to date:  Subscribe to 
Lawmen E-letter Now
Visit the Lawmen E-Letter
Lawmen E-Letter Archives
*****************************************************************

 

Confidentiality Notice. The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," including attachments. The originator intended this Message for the specified recipients only; it may contain the originator's confidential and proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies unintended recipients that they have received this Message in error, and strictly proscribes their Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Recipients-in-error shall notify the originator immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. Authorized carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients.  See: Quon v. Arch.

Wireless Copyright Notice.  Federal and State laws govern copyrights to this Message.  You must have the originator's full written consent to alter, copy, or use this Message.  Originator acknowledges others' copyrighted content in this Message.  Otherwise, Copyright © 2010 by originator Bob Hurt, bob at bobhurt dot com, http://bobhurt.com.  All Rights Reserved.