



Legal, Political, Civilizational Commentary. Not a lawyer; don't give legal advice. Ask if you want help.




 A pair of other men,      disgustingly hirsute, gawked at me as they strode past me into the      barber shop.
A pair of other men,      disgustingly hirsute, gawked at me as they strode past me into the      barber shop.  I grinned as I turned over      the big engine in my 1970 Caddy convertible.  I pictured how      marvelously those tight yoga pants rode up into Mimi's butt crack,      leaving almost nothing to my rabid imagination. Mimi, a natural      perfectionist, had remained my favorite barber for a decade, ever      since I had moved into Clearwater Florida from Silicon Valley to      crank the handle on the money machine.
I grinned as I turned over      the big engine in my 1970 Caddy convertible.  I pictured how      marvelously those tight yoga pants rode up into Mimi's butt crack,      leaving almost nothing to my rabid imagination. Mimi, a natural      perfectionist, had remained my favorite barber for a decade, ever      since I had moved into Clearwater Florida from Silicon Valley to      crank the handle on the money machine.  

 
       I appreciated the Midnight Ride        documentary film.  It should have more assiduously emphasized      individual and community RESPONSIBILITY, not merely complained about      government tyranny that has grown as a consequence of an ignorant      and irresponsible electorate.
I appreciated the Midnight Ride        documentary film.  It should have more assiduously emphasized      individual and community RESPONSIBILITY, not merely complained about      government tyranny that has grown as a consequence of an ignorant      and irresponsible electorate.|  | 





 
 

|  | 
| Qur'an | 
|  | 
| ISIS Ninja & Flag | 
|  | 
| ISIS Flag, Wipe-Worthy | 
I'd        like also to point out the stupidity of the consideration that all        people are or should be equal before the law. 
      
The        stupid, having IQ so low they cannot graduate from high school,        notoriously make stupid choices, which explains the term "stupid"        in reference to them. They cannot compete for the better jobs and        mates, and so they gravitate to crime and welfare abuse to get by.        
      
That        means the rest of society must support them or pay to defend        against their criminal behavior. Bottom line: unsupervised, the        stupid become criminals. 
      
So        it constitutes a crime against humanity to procreate a stupid        child. Society could prevent that crime by outlawing knowing        infliction of a debilitating disease (stupidity) on an innocent        baby. That would justify sterilization of the stupid. 
      
And        since the stupid make stupid choices, of course they should not        vote. Furthermore, the smart, making smarter decisions than the        mediocre, should have more votes than the average. So the law        should never allow universal suffrage, and the suffage it does        allow should let the smart and educated and responsible and        productive have more say than the non-so-smart, less educated,        less responsible and productive. 
      
One        can easily make the case that the stupid and irresponsible, having        the right to vote, have put criminals into government, and will do        that to a greater extent as they increase as a percentage of the        population. 
      
The stupid and irresponsible do increase as a percentage of the population because they procreate at nearly double the rate needed to sustain the gene group, whereas the smart procreate at less than the rate needed to sustain the gene group.
Well,        heck, how smart are the smart after all?
        
      
SCOTUS:  Borrower Lacks Standing to          Challenge PSA          Violations
By Bob Hurt, 4 November 2015
The 2 November          2015 US Supreme          Court denial of certiorari in Tran v Bank of New York settled          once-and-for-all          the spurious assertion that borrowers can challenge putative          violations of the          Pooling and Servicing Agreement (PSA) creating a securitization          trust.  Borrowers,          encouraged by Glaski v BOA, a California          appellate win for the borrower, have claimed that because New          York Law voids          assignment of a note into a trust after its closing date in the          PSA, the          assignee has no authority to enforce the note in a foreclosure          effort.  
This argument boils down to nothing more than          a borrower's          effort to use quirks in the law to get a "free house" by          preventing foreclosure          because the borrower did not make timely payments.  Bottom line the courts will          not allow a          borrower to get a free house unless the lender team injured the          borrower          sufficiently to justify it.
Numerous California courts have deprecated          the Glaski          opinion, as have other courts across the land.           Now the US Supreme Court has flicked its chin at it.
The US 2nd Circuit supported the          NY Southern District          in its reliance upon the 2nd Circuit's Rajamin v          Deutsche Bank          opinion that borrowers lack standing to challenge the PSA or any          assignment of          the note because they 
1.                    Never became a party to          the PSA or assignment
2.                   Did not get injured by          the PSA violation or          assignment, and 
3.                   Receive no 3rd          party benefits from          the PSA or assignment.
Now, the SCOTUS has put the KIBOSH forever on          the frivolous          argument that the borrower can cite irregularities in obeying          the PSA and          assigning the note as a basis for stymieing a foreclosure.  I have presented full          opinions of the          relevant cases.  READ          THEM.
        
If you want to know how to prove the lender          team injured the borrower, and how the borrower can use that          proof to win millions in compensatory and punitive damages,          visit http://MortgageAttack.com.
          
1.                    Tran v. Bank of New York,          Supreme Court of the          United States 2 Nov 2015
          http://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docketfiles/15-260.htm
2.                   Tran v. Bank of New York,          Court of Appeals, 2nd          Circuit 2015
          https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13250751688791686592
3.                   Tran v. Bank of New York,          Dist. Court, SD New          York 2014
          https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8421089202998856475
4.                   RAJAMIN v. DEUTSCHE BANK          NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY,          Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 2014
          https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13230459673637581146          
5.                   Glaski v. Bank of          America, 218 Cal. App. 4th          1079 - Cal: Court of Appeal, 5th Appellate Dist. 2013
          https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8535344425094007526          
|  | Bob Hurt            Blog                      1 2   f  t   |