Crooked Judges, Cops, and            Prosecutors:  Gerps
          
      
              They abuse lawful legal activists              with arrests, convictions, and jail to stop the activism. I              use the term Gerps in reference to  such corrupt/crooked              judges, cops , and prosecutors.  Gerp means "Goverment              Perpetrators of Crimes."  It refers to sole and collective              government criminals who abuse the people under color of law              or behind a badge of authority, flouting the laws and rules              at will in order to stay in power and reap the associated              rewards of misuse or theft of public money, or the              iniquitous pleasure of grinding innocent victims under their              boot heels.
            
      We have a legal term for such              abuse:  SLAPP - Strategic Litigation Against Public              Participation.  SLAPP activities offend the public              conscience because they "chill" exercise of rights,              particularly the right to speak out against the abuse.    By              "chill" I mean they suppress, and through the cost of              defense, they punish public participation in Government,              traditionally outspoken public activism against abuse by              Government.
             
      
                                          | "The                                    American legal system has                                    been corrupted almost beyond                                    recognition..."                  
                     Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, Edith                    Jones, speaking                    before the Federalist Society of Harvard Law School                    (February 2003)http://www.scribd.com/doc/50137887/
 | 
              
      
        
          
          
              Most states have "Anti-SLAPP"              laws.  Florida has such a law, but I consider it quite weak              because it covers only a small area of the SLAPP that              actually occurs.
            
              - Fla.                  Stat. § 768.295 applies to SLAPPs brought by the                government in response to the exercise of "the right to                peacefully assemble, the right to instruct                representatives, and the right to petition for redress of                grievances before the various governmental entities" of                Florida.
- Fla.                  Stat. § 720.304 (4) applies only to homeowners in a                homeowners' association. It protects a homeowner's                exercise of "the right to instruct his or her                representatives or the right to petition for redress of                grievances before the various governmental entities" of                Florida. The statute, which applies to SLAPPs brought by                individuals, business associations, and government                entities, further explains that it is aimed at protecting                against lawsuits arising out of a homeowner's "appearance                and presentation before a governmental entity on matters                related to the homeowners' association."
 
            California put most of its anti-SLAPP functions in the rules            of procedure, leaving it up to California's crooked judges to            punish offenders.  According to the California Anti-Slapp            Project:                        - Code of Civil                  Procedure section 425.16 - California’s              anti-SLAPP statute provides for a special motion to strike a              complaint where the complaint arises from activity              exercising the rights of petition and free speech. The              statute was first enacted in 1992.
- Code of Civil                  Procedure section 425.17 - This              statute was enacted to correct abuse of the anti-SLAPP              statute (CCP § 425.16). It prohibits anti-SLAPP motions in              response to (1) public interest litigation when certain              conditions are met, and (2) certain actions against a              business that arise from commercial statements or conduct of              the business.
- Code of Civil                  Procedure section 425.18 - This              statute was enacted primarily to facilitate the recovery by              SLAPP victims of their damages through a SLAPPback              (malicious prosecution action) against the SLAPP filers and              their attorneys after the underlying SLAPP has been              dismissed. It provides that the prevailing defendant              attorney fee and immediate appeal provisions of the              anti-SLAPP law do not apply to SLAPPbacks, and that an              anti-SLAPP motion may not be filed against a SLAPPback by a              party whose filing or maintenance of the prior cause of              action from which the SLAPPback arises was illegal as a              matter of law.
- Code of Civil                  Procedure sections 1987.1 and 1987.2 - These              statutes set forth a procedure for challenging subpoenas.              The 2008 amendment to section 1987.1 allows any person to              challenge subpoenas for “personally identifying information”              sought in connection with an underlying lawsuit involving              that person’s exercise of free speech rights. This amendment              also added section 1987.2(b), which provides that such a              person who successfully challenges such a subpoena arising              from a lawsuit filed in another state based on exercise of              free speech rights on the Internet is entitled to recover              his or her attorney fees.
- Civil Code section                  47 - Defines privileged              publication or broadcast and immunizes participants in              official proceedings or litigation against all tort actions              except malicious prosecution. This statute figures              prominently in many cases. .
      
            Florida, California, and other states need more comprehensive            protection against SLAPP - protection that actually labels and            punishes the abusers, much as they label and punish sex            offenders.  Make no mistake, SLAPP constitutes a form of            psychic and financial RAPE that personifies iniquity in            government.
            
            Legal activist Dr. Joseph Zernik has cited, and complained            about in his screed below, three poignant examples of abuse by            crooks in the judiciary and its enablers in other branches of            government:                -           Dr. Richard Fein, whistle                  blower and former prosecutor in Southern California; 
-           Jeffrey Baron of Texas;  and 
 
 
-           David Schied, a Michigan court                  watcher. 
Anti-SLAPP laws did not help any of            them prevent or prevail against the abuse or abusers.
                
          
              Gerps - the Problem
          
      That kind of abuse starts and              continues nationwide because of lack of meaningful              consequences to the Gerps.  I have suggested above, and you              can see by reading the effete Anti-SLAPP laws of Florida,              the suggestion that SLAPP happens because of              misunderstanding or something, not by downright iniquity on              the part of Gerps who abuse the citizenry for standing up to              them.
            
      Collusion and other corruption in              the court system causes the problem.  Lack of effective              means of relief and remedy, and lack of punishment of Gerps,              perpetuate the problem.  Corrupt cops won't arrest, rotten              prosecutors won't prosecute, and crooked judges won't              convict or jail each other unless their own organizations              turn against them.  The corrupt include judges who hand down              patently unjust rulings, bailiffs/sheriffs/marshals/police              who obey illegal orders and falsely arrest as court              henchmen, and prosecutors who coerce 80% of the defendants              into abusive plea bargains and prosecute myriad unjust              cases.   All turn a blind eye to the malfeasance of the              others in their evil good old boys network.
            
      In reality, Gerpitude (Gerp              behavior pervading governments) constitutes a form of covert              war and treason against the constitutions through the              flouting and betrayal of related limits on Government power.              Such systemic treason continues unabated because of its              popularity among Gerps and the lack of effective systemic              tools available to the people for stopping it by              apprehension and punishment of Gerps.
            
      So, why do activists believe one              can obtain relief and remedy through the court system?  Why              do they believe that the injurious system ought to provide              relief or remedy as a matter of policy to those who seek to              embarrass it by monitoring, discovering, exposing, and              reporting on  the corruption?
      
              Minimum Requirement for an Activist -            Witnesses
      I have said repeatedly, and it bears            reiteration, that 
          
                                            | an                        activist must always have one or more friendly                        witnesses, and must record the incidents, | 
              
      
            and obtain affidavits from the witnesses.  ONLY that can give            any measure of security against false arrest and harassment by            operatives of the policing and court systems throughout            America.  Activists should record the incidents            surreptitiously to avoid damage to and theft of the record and            recording devices by officials.      The incidents identified below              prove the sense of my assertions above.  
      
              How to Handle a Bully
      Now, when a bully taunts, teases, and            beats you in public school, what do you do?  You yell for the            guard, teacher, or principal to stop the abuse and punish the            abuser.  Then what happens?  The teacher thinks you caused the            problem and lets the bully go.  These days the teacher can't            beat the bully's butt as in the old days.  So nothing comes of            it, and the next day, the bully steals your lunch money, tears            your shirt, and causes you more grief.    If you punch the            bully back, the teacher catches and punishes you, and the            bully loves it.      How should you handle the bully?               Well, you quake in fear and take it.  Hey it only lasts a              few years.  Or you do as Jesus said and turn the other              cheek.  That might reform the bully, but one must do that              with a certain panache that you don't possess.               Instead, you don't alert the teachers by yelling about the              bully.  You simply surprise and waylay the bully after              school, jump on him, and beat the snot out of him.  You do              it after school, looking carefully to ensure nobody sees              you.   You do it alone so nobody tells on you.   You tell              nobody about it, not your parents or your best friend              forever.  Only then does the bully stop bullying you and              your chums, and you stay out of trouble with the authorities              for taking the law into your own hands.
      Apparently, activists feel              reluctant to treat Gerps like bullies.  Instead of reading              endless complaints like those below, I might instead read              the judge's or cop's or prosecutor's obituary, or a little              column on page A40 about the judge having a car wreck, or              his wife dumping him for philandering, the state's Judicial              Qualifications Commission ousting him for bribe taking, his              doing hospital time in the hospital for multiple contusions,              his sudden and unexpected resignation from office, his              taking of a job as a car salesman, his failure to show up              for work, his relocation to Tahiti to learn French, etc.
      Do I condone going outside the law              to deal with Gerps?  No, I do not.  I encourage obedience to              the law.  
            
      I also believe that the true test              of a spiritual being lies in the ability to make things go              right.  One does what one must in order to keep one's self,              family, and community safe, healthy, and solvent.  Period.               No maybes. Even at the cost of personal sacrifice.  No              matter what.
      
              Gerps Sign Their Own Excision            Warrants???
      Government exists to prevent, not            perpetrate injustice. Every judge and other public employee            swore an oath to support the constitutions.  That means the            judges have no power outside that given in the constitutions,            and the 9th and 10th Amendments mean we the people and the            states have all the remaining rights intact.        Unfortunately, no state or federal              law specifically punishes violation of the oath.  I suppose              legislators felt reluctant to make such laws because many              government employees must often make judgment calls, they              can make innocent mistakes, and legislators believe the              public should not hold them accountable for those mistakes.             
      I don't know about you, but that              seems totally idiotic to me.  Why did your parents penalize              your wrong behavior and reward your right behavior as a              child?  To teach you the difference, of course, and to guide              you to right behavior and away from wrong behavior so you              could obtain rewards and avoid the penalties.  If we have no              laws that identify certain behavior as violative of loyalty              oaths, and penalize that behavior accordingly, then we the              people will get precisely the opposite of what we intend.               And we will get that onerous behavior from every government              employee, at the whim of the employee.  Judges and other              elected / appointed officials have NO BOSS but the ignorant,              often stupid, irresponsible, or criminal, people who elected              or appointed them. If neither the law, the legislature, the              executive branch, the courts, nor the people themselves              catch and punish Gerps, then Gerps will continue their abuse              forever, and more Gerps will arise to fill the boots of              those who die in office.
            
      Worst of all, Judges enjoy              unqualified immunity for judicial acts, and both prosecutors              and cops enjoy qualified immunity for their wrongdoings,              particularly their tortious conduct that injures citizens.               No provision in any constitution bestows such immunity.               They have all aggrandized themselves with it, and now public              policy enforces it.  That means they can, will, and do              unjustly hurt people and get away with it, Scot-free.  And,              sadly, they will do the same to you, given the motive and              opportunity.
      Unfortunately, we the people have              no choice but to circumvent government authority, circumvent              any prohibitive laws, and do whatever we must to excise the              Gerpitude, and if necessary the Gerp, from Government.  It              must happen suddenly, by surprise, summarily, without              quibble or qualm.
      What does that mean in practical              terms?  It means the Gerp has no natural right to expect a              "day in court." The Gerp waived that right when swearing the              loyalty oath, and the Legislature perpetuated it by enacting              no law that punished violation of the loyalty oath or              denominating such violations as formal treason.  We the              People must excise and dispatch the Gerp "without day."               THAT is what the loyalty oath means.  No criminal law              penalizes violation of the oath because the founders knew              that people won't tolerate abuse beyond a certain point.               They will rally together to tar                and feather and run the                Gerp out of town on a rail.  They know the citizenry              will take the law into its own hands.
      If evil state actors (Gerps) abuse              your rights, they lose the expectation that they can remain              safe from retribution, reprisal, and summary excision from              Government, and possibly from the planet, for their crimes.               Thus, they, by their Gerpitude, sign their own excision              warrants - they virtually beg for someone to take them out              of Government authority by whatever expedient means the              excisor deems expedient.
      Furthermore, they know that by              their Gerpitude they injure the Government (whose other              actors refuse to excise or punish them), the electorate, and              the remainder of the population by depriving the populace of              honorable, lawful government.  They injure EVERYONE              incidentally, not merely the individual direct targets of              their abuse.  Thus, the Gerp's abusive behavior begs for              someone, anyone to terminate the abuse and excise              the Gerp by any means expedient and necessary.
      
              Excisors Sign Their Own Excision            Warrants???
      Anybody with common sense knows that            Gerps, particularly officers, naturally protect one another            from reprisal by abused, angry, and intolerant citizens.             Therefore, the citizen must exercise extreme caution when            considering initiation of a report about the Gerp's abuse to            other government operatives.  By making that report, one            paints a big X at the center of one's forehead, one that will            line up with a Government sniper's telescopic sight,            figuratively speaking.        By that I mean if you make a              report, the FBI or other investigators will suspect you as              the culprit if the targeted GERP suffers some harm or              mishap.   They will suspect you even if you only              contemplated what to do to stop the abuse.  They will come              after you, find you, arrest you, get the DOJ to get a grand              jury to indict you or issue an information against you, get              you prosecuted, and get you jailed and fined.  Or, they will              simply kill you on the spot.  Only a fool makes himself such              a target for counter-retribution.
      If you raise an alarm about the              abuse, the same thing might happen to you that happened to              the three hapless men Zernik discusses below.  Government              operatives might come after you, beat you, steal your              possessions, and jail you for years.  You could lose your              spouse, children, house, car, and boat, your 1954 Fender              Stratocaster, your AK-47, your Barrett M95 .50 caliber              sniper rifle, your other militia gear, your              remote-controlled web-casting spy quadro-copter, your              Harley, your bong, your porn collection, your iPhone 5, iPad              3, and iMac, I mean EVERYTHING.
      
              Citizens Too Must Know the Law and Do            Right
      But, try to see this issue in            perspective.  What if YOU, the abused, suffer from such            ignorance or stupidity that you don't know the law, don't know            your responsibilities as a citizen, don't understand the            common sense requirements of life in a modern, fast-paced            society in the land of the free and home of the brave?  In            other words, what if you only BELIEVE the "Government" or some            Government Operative like a judge or cop abuses you, but in            reality, you make so many mistakes in your dealings with            society, or the members of your household or workplace, that            YOU actually abuse the system or those who run it?  What            then?  What if you you have such a mistaken understanding of            the duties of Government Operatives that you believe they do            wrong when actually they do right?  What if they face            impossible pressures and you become a victim of circumstance,            not a victim of actual intentional abuse?  In all of these            situations YOU have certain responsibilities to read and study            and know the law, the rules of procedure, the regulations, the            ideals of good government, and the ideals of citizenship.  YOU            have the obligation to cooperate to minimize trouble.
            
            What if the mistake in a question of abuse comes from your own            intolerable and abusive or inept behavior?  You can hardly            blame government operatives for lining up their cross hairs on            you and making you a "person of interest."
            
            I make this point to illustrate the difference between            situations of the three victims Zernik cited below, and YOUR            potential situation.  Your own incompetence or lack of            literacy in the law might have caused all of your problems            with Government.  
            
            For example, suppose you believe that your "right to travel"            means you don't need a driver license or license plates.  In            that case you obviously don't understand Government            obligations to ensure public safety by determining and posting            speed limits, testing and licensing to ensure that only            competent drivers operate motor vehicles which become            dangerous weapons of destruction and death in incompetent            hands,  and Government right to impose, levy, and collect            taxes, such as driver license and license plate taxes.  
            
            In that case, you don't realize that your right to travel            safely on public highways must coincide with the rights of            others safely to travel, and safely to stand near or cross            public highways.  Immature and ignorant drivers following your            lead might stupidly think they can get away with speeding            drunkenly at 120 miles per hour in a 30 mph zone, putting the            society at risk of terrible loss.  You and everyone else            should know better than that.  So you can hardly blame            Government Operatives for making you a person of interest for            spouting such nonsense as "I have a right to travel, and            therefore I should not have to obtain a driver license."
            
            Everything I have written about Gerps falls within this            context.  Citizens might stupidly made themselves persons of            interest by flouting the practical laws of our land.             Government operatives do not become Gerps merely by arresting,            prosecuting, and convicting people for their crimes.  They            become Gerps by doing that to the innocent who have not            committed crimes.  And the innocent have the obligation to use            common sense and reason to stay out of trouble with the law.            The innocent and stupid didn't just fall off a turnip truck or            get raised by a pack of wolves.  They generally know the            difference between right and wrong, and know they have the            obligation to do right, even when they find it difficult.
            
            Bottom line, I see no excuse for widespread ignorance or            flouting of the law, except among the abysmally stupid who            constitute only about 10% of the population.  That means I            have little patience with and sympathy for Patriot Myth            Mongers such as those who stupidly insist that their right to            travel takes seniority over Government power and duty to keep            unlicensed people out of the driver's seat.  You must do your            duty:  learn the law, obey the law, and become disposed to            using the law to obtain relief and remedy for injury.
          
          
              Whoever stands closest to the snake            has a duty:  Grab a Stick and Whack it.
      Why whack the snack?  BECAUSE ITS            POISONOUS BITE WILL KILL THE INNOCENT UNWARY BYSTANDER.  We            don't hate snakes.  We hate the suffering and death that comes            from their poisonous bites to innocent and unwary humans.
            
            Gerps constitute society's POISONOUS SNAKES who viciously and            whimsically strike the bystanders who don't feed and nurture            them.  They often bite even the hands that feed them.  By            "whacking" them I don't mean literally beating them to death            with a stick.  I mean one must use common sense in defanging            them so as to return them to honesty and lawfulness, or excising them from government altogether.  
            
            The laws of inertia affect Gerps.  They simply won't become            honest again (if they EVER behaved honestly at all) UNLESS and            UNTIL an outside force acts to make their Gerpitude far less            comfortable to them than honest dealing.  Since we typically            cannot trust government itself to apply the discomfort            necessary to effect the change, YOU THE CITIZEN must do it.             Somebody has to do that onerous, dirty job, and the            circumstance of your standing nearby ELECTS YOU to do it.
          
        And              that does not mean putting your life, liberty, and property              in grave danger by standing up to Gerps through legal              process without witnesses, buffers, and protection of some              kind.  Standing up to Gerps requires not only fortitude and              action.  It requires common sense application of principles              of personal, family, and community safety, solvency, and              longevity.  You know that determined Gerps will come after              you and intimidate or kill you for threatening their              hegemony.  So you should, unless you stupidity guides you,              do it surreptitiously, anonymously, with great trepidation              and caution, and decisively, possibly through agents, after              carefully studying and learning the many means Gerps have of              discovering your intentions and identifying you and your              methods.
              
              I believe spearheading the excision of Gerps while remaining              personally safe requires intelligence, skill, and guts              because it constitutes business.  If one must have              confederates, one should select a few competent, discrete,              and determined associates to achieve a quiet result.  Or,              one must arouse a huge crowd across the county, state,              and/or nation to clamor against the Gerp and demand              excision, stripping of rights, and punishment - a head on a              pike, so to speak - very noisy and public.
            
              For Whom the Bell Tolls
      I end my comments with this story.      In merry Olde England a calamity              or summons by the king or local lord would cause the              townspeople to raise a hue and cry through church bells.               Some bells announced prayer time or church services.  The              alarm peals told outlying farmers/suburbians to come into              town and help, and to bring weapons or tools they would need              for the job at hand.  Sometimes the nature of the peals told              the suburbians what kind of calamity existed.  Certain bell              ringing meant fire, some meant invasion, etc.  In any case,              it meant "YOU FARMERS GET IN HERE AND HELP."  When people              responded
      An English cleric named John Donne              wrote about this in a famous "meditation" in 1623:
      
                                          | Devotions Upon Emergent                    Occasions 
 
 MEDITATION XVII.
 
 NUNC LENTO SONITU DICUNT, MORIERIS.
 
 Now this bell tolling softly for another,
 says to me, Thou must die.
 
 
 
 PERCHANCE                he for whom this bell tolls may be so ill as that he knows                not it tolls for him.  And perchance I may think myself so                much better than I am, as that they who are about me, and                see my state, may have caused it to toll for me, and I                know not that.  The church is catholic, universal, so are                all her actions; all that she does, belongs to all.  When                she baptizes a child, that action concerns me; for that                child is thereby connected to that head which is my head                too, and ingraffed into that body, whereof I am a member.                 And when she buries a man, that action concerns me; all                mankind is of one author, and is one volume; when one man                dies, one chapter is not torn out of the book, but                translated into a better language; and every chapter must                be so translated; God employs several translators; some                pieces are translated by age, some by sickness, some by                war, some by justice; but God's hand is in every                translation, and his hand shall bind up all our scattered                leaves again, for that library where every book shall lie                open to one another; as therefore the bell that rings to a                sermon, calls not upon the preacher only, but upon the                congregation to come; so this bell calls us all: but how                much more me, who am brought so near the door by this                sickness. 
 There was a contention as far as a suit (in which, piety                and dignity, religion and estimation, were mingled) which                of the religious orders should ring to prayers first in                the morning; and it was determined, that they should ring                first that rose earliest.  If we understand aright the                dignity of this bell, that tolls for our evening prayer,                we would be glad to make it ours, by rising early, in that                application, that it might be ours as well as his, whose                indeed it is.  The bell doth toll for him, that thinks it                doth; and though it intermit again, yet from that minute,                that that occasion wrought upon him, he is united to God.                 Who casts not up his eye to the sun when it rises?  But                who takes off his eye from a comet, when that breaks out?                who bends not his ear to any bell, which upon any occasion                rings?  But who can remove it from that bell, which is                passing a piece of himself out of this world?
 
 No man is an island,  entire of itself; every man is a                piece of the continent, a part of the main; if a clod be                washed away by the sea, Europe is the less, as well as if                a promontory were, as well as if a manor of thy friend's                or of thine own were;  any man's death diminishes me,                because I am involved in mankind, and therefore never send                to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.
 
 Neither can we call this a begging of misery, or a                borrowing of misery, as though we were not miserable                enough of ourselves, but must fetch in more from the next                house, in taking upon us the misery of our neighbors.                 Truly it were an excusable covetousness if we did; for                affliction is a treasure, and scarce any man hath enough                of it.  No man hath afflicion enough, that is not matured                and ripened by it, and made fit for God by that                affliction.  If a man carry treasure in bullion or in a                wedge of gold, and have none coined into current moneys,                his treasure will not defray him as he travels.                 Tribulation is treasure in the nature of it, but it is                not current money in the use of it, except we get nearer                and nearer our home, heaven, by it.  Another may be sick                too, and sick to death, and this affliction may lie in his                bowels, as gold in a mine, and be of no use to him; but                this bell that tells me of his affliction, digs out, and                applies that gold to me: if by this consideration of                another's danger, I take mine own into contemplation, and                so secure myself, by making my recourse to my God, who is                our only security.
 
 | 
              
      
        
            HOLY MOLY!  Just LOOK at the              famous, quotable quotations in that meditation:
              -           No man is an island,  entire                  of itself 
-           affliction is a treasure, and                  scarce any man hath enough of it 
-           by this consideration of                  another's danger, I take mine own into contemplation 
- The bell doth toll for him, that thinks it doth
-           never send to know for whom                  the bell tolls; it tolls for thee 
I hope you get my point, you who              read this.  Don't think I have scribbled this commentary for              someone else to read and for you only to ponder.
      The bell tolls.  It tolls for              YOU.  Get off your butt, grab your tools for the job,               muster, and take action.  NOW.
            
      
            Citizen Action Plan
                    -           Live an honorable, righteous                  life in obedience to the laws of the land. 
-           Study the ideals of good                  government, constitutions, laws, rules of evidence and                  court procedure, causes of action, and litigation                  practice so that you can efficiently and effectively                  prosecute a case against Gerps. 
-           Communicate with elected and                  appointed officials; tell them what you expect and                  demand of them, and what you will not tolerate.
 
 
-           Attune yourself to the                  behavior of Government employees - YOU CANNOT CONTROL                  WHAT YOU DO NOT MONITOR.
 
 
-           Document the malfeasance of                  Gerps and the travails of others against Gerps. 
-           Acknowledge and honor noble,                  competent, honest Government employees for their                  goodness and service. 
-           Use private investigators to                  dig up all the dirt on Gerps, including their financial                  affairs - ALWAYS FOLLOW THE MONEY.
 
 
-           Learn to make the news media                  your friend and get them to expose the crookedness of                  and draw negative public attention to the Gerps. 
-           Become a witness for others, a                  "court watcher," and learn to write affidavits and give                  testimony against Gerps for their victims. 
-           Become a political activist to                  excise Gerps from Government and replace them with                  honorable men and women of knowledge and intelligence -                  campaign for good candidates, push hard to get them                  elected and keep them in office, inform yourself about                  the initiatives, referendums, and candidates, vote                  wisely  in every election. 
-           Find and use some method with                  minimum risk of harm to yourself and your loved ones of                  terminating Gerpitude and excising Gerps from                  Government. 
-           Run for public office yourself                  on a platform of honesty, integrity, competence, thrift,                  and adherence to the ideals of good government, then                  govern accordingly within the bounds of constitutional                  authority. 
-           Encourage and teach others to                  do all of the above, especially this: 
                  The bell tolls for                        YOU.  Respond accordingly.
                
        
      
      
      
      Bob Hurt.
      
        
        
        
        
            On 07/01/2012 01:44 PM, joseph zernik        wrote:
      
              Imprisoned Court Watcher David            Schied -            The Judicial House of Cards and How it is Falling Down at the            Expense of            the People
            
          David Schied protested judicial corruption.  David Schied            was            booked and is held under false records. The habeas corpus            petitions are            going up and down, repeatedly denied by the courts.  The case            increasingly resembles that of the 70-year old, former US            Prosecutor            Richard Fine, who was held on false records in solitary            confinement for            18 months, while his habeas corpus petitions, up to the            Supreme Court,            were routinely subjected to simulated review and fraud on the            courts. The            court system is corrupt beyond repair.
            
                  ![[]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiOepZhOnR670cc5_Rj8bMtAlQz3KtrS54sThk-cWg0flwNDki7d54SDc6dG3JuifkWXd_J9TeHjTG__gA8LBzp8XJqs7kG57rs17pdQCI19cOy_6iVZHezFWLWoFOlbab2EDihhA/s1600/FLAG+US+LARGE+UPSIDE+DOWN.jpg) 
        
          Anonymous recommends flying the flag upside down, a          traditional          signal of distress...
          
          View as PDF:                              http://www.scribd.com/doc/98810021/
            
          Los            Angeles,            July 1 - "How many cases like David Schied in Michigan,          [1] Jeffery Baron in Texas, [2] Richard Fine in          California,          [3] and many others from coast to coast, of obvious          ridicule of          the rule of law by judges, do we need to realize that the system          is          broken beyond repair?," questions Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human          Rights Alert (NGO).
          
          David Schied, who has been protesting judicial corruption, was          held and          confined, and silently watching open court proceedings.  David          Schied was booked and is now held under false records, stating          that he          was imprisoned by the authority of Clinton Court, where he had          never sat          foot.  The writs of habeas are going up and down, repeatedly          denied.  
          
          The case increasingly resembles that of the 70-year old, former          US          Prosecutor Richard Fine.  Richard Fine showed that all judges in          Los          Angeles County, California, have been taking "not permitted          payments" (called by media "bribes") for over a          decade.  His protest eventually required the signing of          "retroactive immunities" (called by media "unlawful          pardons") for all such judges. Soon after the "immunities"          were signed, Richard Fine arrested and imprisoned in solitary          confinement          for 18 months.  
          
          The Sheriff of Los Angeles County insisted on producing booking          records          that stated that Richard Fine was arrested and booked on          locations and by          authority of the San Pedro Municipal Court, which did not exist.          Richard          Fine's habeas corpus petitions, up to the Supreme Court, were          routinely          subjected to simulated review and fraud on the courts. 
          
          The court system is corrupt beyond repair.
          
          Cases like this do NOT happen in civil societies.  Surely they          do          not pass unchallenged and patronized by the higher courts, as is          the          standard in the United States today.
          
        LINKS:
          [1] 12-06-27          Update -          Redford Court Watcher Jailed for Alleged Contempt of Court
                      http://www.scribd.com/doc/98449493/
          12-06-09 COURT WATCHER JAILED FOR 30 DAYS FOR REMAINING          SILENT
                      http://www.scribd.com/doc/96582208/
          [2] 11-04-23          Habeas          Corpus in the United States - the case of Richard Isaac Fine 
                      http://www.scribd.com/doc/24729084/
          [3] 12-03-11 PRESS RELEASE: Ex Parte Receivership        over the        Person and Property of Defendant Jeffrey Baron racketeering in the        US        District Court in Texas is patronized by the US Court of Appeals,        5th        Circuit
                  http://www.scribd.com/doc/84950169/
        
        MORE ON THE CASE OF DAVID SCHIED 
        
        Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012          11:19:17          -0400
          Subject: David Schied - The Judicial House of Cards and how            it is            Falling Down at the Expense of the People
          From: "Trish Kraus" 
          Attached is a pdf of the precursors to horrific event.          [1]
          
          Many things have transpired since the last I've talked to you          all.          The
          corruption within  the Wayne County Clerks office working in          collusion
          with the courts are apprehensible! Wow details to follow.
          
          "NINE" Writ of Habeas Corpus have been submitted total not          counting
          Davids to every judicial branch in Michigan demanding release          and          the
          written ORDER to why he is being held.
          
          Below are some uploaded documents that you most have already          seen.
          David's Affidavit & Crime Report
          Three filed Writ of Habeas Coupus'
          
            http://www.facebook.com/notes/jet-trish-kraus/the-great-writ-of-liberty/10150921583619069          
          
          The only good news is that David is going to be released at 5am          in
          Midland on Monday the 2nd. However they will not disclose if          they          have
          added any time to his sentence after throwing him in the hole          after          he
          submitted a hand written Writ of Habeas to a sheriff which was
          returned to him. (illegal)
          
          P.S David Lonier will you please print off the attached document          for
          me to reference at todays public forum.
          
          A GRAVE miscarriage of justice has happened the test case for          NDAA          has
          been put into place here. Further moving this country into the
          Assemblies of We the People through Grand Juries.
          
          It has been an extremely tough battle working the system the          correct
          way only to meet with corruption the entire way up to the US          District
          Court.
          
          FYI, this is the first local mass media mailing.
          "Please distribute this information to national and          international
          media the time is right!"
          
          The battle is just beginning!
          
          Trish Kraus
          734-637-4720
          
          Contact: David Lonier
                                                            FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
          Tel: 248-373-9111
          Email:davidlonier@gmail.com
          
          Court Observer Jailed
          30 days for alleged contempt of court
          
          Wayne and Midland Counties Michigan  June 27, 2012 -   After          four
          petitions (Writs of Habeas Corpus) to gain his release, David          Schied
          remains locked up in the Midland County jail.  On June 8th the          Novi
          Michigan man was committed by Judge Karen Khalil of the Redford
          Township 17th District Court to spend up to 30 days in jail on a
          charge of  “contempt of court” for sitting quietly observing a          court
          proceeding of which he was not a party.  There have been 4          separate
          requests for the “Record of Action”, a transcript and an          audio/video
          record of the hearing at which David was abducted. All requests          have
          been denied.
          
          Question:  Can someone be legally convicted of “contempt of          court”          and
          sentenced to 30 days in jail without a hearing or case number,          without
          a transcript, without due process, without an audio/video, or          any
          proof whatsoever of having committed “any act which is          calculated to
          embarrass, hinder or obstruct court in administration of justice          or          is
          calculated to lessen its authority or its dignity”?   Is an          observer
          of a proceeding, a party to the proceeding and would such an          observer
          be considered as “under the court’s authority”?
          
          On June 16, David handed a guard (sheriff deputy) an “Inmate          Request
          Form” in which he crossed out “Inmate” and wrote “Captive” and          asked          5
          questions to which the answers were totally inane:
          Why am I being held in jail?  Ans: You are sentenced to 30 days          No          Bond
          
          What is the criminal charge?  Ans: Contempt of Court
          
          What act did I allegedly commit?  Ans: Contempt  Write the          prosecutor
          for report & details
          
          Who is the harmed party?  Ans: Clinton County court
          
          Who is my accuser?  Ans: Clinton County court
          
          What makes these answers so despicable is that besides there          being          no
          evidence of “Contempt” as defined by the law dictionaries or
          otherwise, David has never set foot in Clinton County court.
          
          With access to only paper and pencil, David was able to draft          his          own
          Writ of Habeas Corpus and submit it to a guard, who is supposed          to          see
          that it gets to the proper authorities.  The guard later          returned          it
          to David and told him that it was refused with no explanation,
          whereupon David filed a formal complaint against the prison
          administration, which was answered with more time in isolation          (the
          hole) and a threat of extended jail time.
          
          David has several law suits filed against various administrative          and
          judicial actors who have committed various crimes against          litigants
          and the courts, several of which name the judge who ordered his
          apparent kidnapping.  He had two deadlines to file court papers          and          an
          appearance hearing scheduled for the time period of his          incarceration.
           An attorney who has been helping David with his legal endeavors          filed
          a request for an extension of the deadline for his appearance          hearing
          and it was denied.
          
          A fifth petition for a Writ was filed yesterday with the Federal
          District Court, Eastern Division of Michigan and a hearing is
          scheduled for tomorrow, June 28th.  In none of the previous          hearings
          was David brought to the court to make his case of unlawful          detention
          as is required by law.  Will tomorrow’s court hearing obey the          law?
          
          Those working to free David believe that due to David’s history          as a
          crime victims’ rights advocate, exposing judicial corruption and
          naming Judge Khalil and Redford Township officials as defendants          in
          several law suits, as well filing with the Judicial Tenure          Commission,
          that the evidence is overwhelming that this judge is using her
          judicial powers to retaliate against him.
          
          Mr. Schied has earned a high degree of respect and achieved many
          praiseworthy accomplishments as an educator, advocate and          entering          his
          doctoral program in the fall.
        LINKS:
          [1] 12-07-01          Imprisoned court          watcher DAVID SCHIED - The Judicial House of Cards and How It is          Falling          Down at the Expense of the People s
                      http://www.scribd.com/doc/98808146/
            
          Boycott the US            presidential            vote! It only legitimizes the illegitimate... 
          12-04-15 2012 Presidential election          votes will be          counted in Spain
                      http://www.scribd.com/doc/89464081/
          Occupy! 
          11-12-10 Where should Occupy go next?          Civil          Disobedience in the footsteps of Thoreau and Gandhi!
          http          ://            www.scribd.com/doc/75348301/
          12-06-08 Courts and Judges as racketeering enterprises under          RICO          (the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) - key          element in          the current financial crisis
                      http://www.scribd.com/doc/96504009/
          Secede! The US in            its current            form is simply unmanageable...
          12-01-01 Secession - A Smart Business          Move!
                      http://www.scribd.com/doc/76877453/
          Get Up, stand up,            stand up for            your rights! 
          _______
          Joseph Zernik, PhD
        Human Rights Alert (NGO)
                   
          
          The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights          Council          (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed by the HRC professional          staff          and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report          with a          note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal          profession and          discrimination by law enforcement in California.”
        Human Rights Alert online
                   
         
        Flag Counter:          140
                      http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/  
                      http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/ 
                      http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ 
        Total Reads:          880,060 
          Followers:          1,532
                                http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
                      http://www.scribd.com/SeyagLizhuyotHaadam 
        Total Reads:          45,147
                                http://twitter.com/inproperinla 
                      http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345 
        Total Item            Views:        664,803+249,012         
                      http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
                      http://www.facebook.com/joseph.zernik 
        Facebook Friends:          2,211
          _____________________________
            
          Take away justice, then, and what            are            governments but great bandit bands?
          Saint Augustine, Civitas Dei (City            of            God,4.4) 
          _____________________________
          WHAT DID THE EXPERT SAY ABOUT THE CURRENT FINANCIAL CRISIS?
          *  "I think it's          difficult          to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S.          history," said Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law          School who has written articles analyzing the role of courts in          the          financial crisis. "I can't think of one where you have literally          tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of          thousands of          cases." 
        Reuters (Jan 22, 2012)
                      http://www.scribd.com/doc/79572282/
          * Foreclosure fraud:          The          homeowner nightmares continue
        CNN (April 7, 2011)
          * About 3            million homes          have been repossessed since the housing boom ended in 2006… That          number          could balloon to about 6 million by 2013 
          Bloomberg (January 2011)
          * "...a system in which          only the          little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers          especially, can cheat and defraud without          consequences." 
                              http://www.scribd.com/doc/50753639/
          Prof Paul Krugman, MIT (2011)
          _____________________________
          WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS            ANGELES            COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?
          *                  "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for          crimes they did not commit." 
        Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School,          LA          (2001) 
                      http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
          *        "This is          conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police          states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent          people are          convicted."     
        Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law          School          (2001) 
                              http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/
          *        "Innocent people remain in          prison"
        *        "...the          LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the          justice          system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be          investigated          relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any          response          that we know of..."
        LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
                      http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306          /
          _____________________________
            WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN            CALIFORNIA?
          *                  "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and          discrimination by law enforcement in California." 
        United Nations Human Rights Council Staff          Report          (2010)
                      http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
          _____________________________
            WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE STATE COURTS IN THE UNITED            STATES?
            * "On July 26,          2010,          Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department          of          Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important          speech to          the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the          disintegration of our state justice systems before they become          indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."
        Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School          (2010), per          National Defender Leadership Institute (2010)
          http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert          
          _____________________________
          WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE CONDITIONS IN THE PRISON            IN MONROE            COUNTY, TENESSEE?
          * "What goes on there          is          more like gulags of centuries ago."
        ACLU
                              http://www.scribd.com/doc/72546279/
          _____________________________
          WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE            UNITED            STATES?
          * "More than 100 law          professors have signed on to a letter released today that          proposes          congressional hearings and legislation aimed at fashioning          "mandatory and enforceable" ethics rules for Supreme Court          justices for the first time. The effort, coordinated by the          liberal          Alliance for Justice, was triggered by "recent media reports,"          the letter said, apparently referring to stories of meetings and          other          potential conflicts of interest involving Justices Antonin          Scalia and          Clarence Thomas among others."
        More than 100 law professors, as reported by          the Blog          of the Legal Times (February 2011)          
                              http://www.scribd.com/doc/49586436/
          _____________________________
          WHAT DID CHIEF JUDGE OF THE US COURT OF APPEALS, 5TH CIRCUIT,            SAY            ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM? 
          * "The American legal          system has          been corrupted almost beyond recognition..."          
          Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, Edith Jones,          speaking          before the Federalist Society of Harvard Law School (February          2003)
                      http://www.scribd.com/doc/50137887/
          _____________________________
          WHAT DID THE CHAIR OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAY            ABOUT THE US            JUSTICE SYSTEM?
          * In a speech in          Georgetown          University, Senator Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary          Committee called          for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" on the US          Department of Justice.
        Transcript of          Senator Leahy          speech (2009)
                      http://www.scribd.com/doc/38472251/
          ____________________________